1 / 24

Mercury’s Surface Composition Kerri Donaldson Hanna

Mercury’s Surface Composition Kerri Donaldson Hanna. Questions answered by studying surface composition. What type of geologic history has Mercury undergone? This would constrain the thermal evolution of the planet How much FeO is on the surface?

carnig
Download Presentation

Mercury’s Surface Composition Kerri Donaldson Hanna

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mercury’s Surface Composition Kerri Donaldson Hanna

  2. Questions answered by studying surface composition • What type of geologic history has Mercury undergone? • This would constrain the thermal evolution of the planet • How much FeO is on the surface? • This would constrain the evolution models discussed last week • How much space weathering has occurred on Mercury’s surface? • This would constrain the space environment of the planet over its history • Does any of the material in the exosphere come from Mercury’s surface? • This would constrain the interactions between the exosphere and the magnetic field, solar wind, and/or surface

  3. Common minerals on planetary surfaces • Feldspars [(K,Ba,Ca,Na)Si3O8] • Two groups: K - Ba solutions and Ca - Na solutions (plagioclase) • Anorthite most abundant plagioclase on the Moon • Pyroxenes [(Mg,Fe,Ca)(Mg,Fe)Si2O6] • Two groups: orthopyroxenes and clinopyroxenes • Fe-rich, Mg-rich, Ca-rich, NaAl-rich, and CaMn-rich • Olivines [(Mg,Fe)2SiO4] • Common in the mantle on Earth • Solid solution between Mg-rich and Fe-rich • Fe-Ti Oxides [FeO, TiO2, FeTiO3] • Other minerals include sulfates, sulfides, carbonates, amphiboles, micas • On Mercury no plate tectonics or hydrologic cycle, should expect rocks and minerals that are associated with the crystallization of magma, possible igneous intrusions, and meteorite impact melting, fracturing, and mixing

  4. Mercury versus the Moon • Originally Mercury thought to be similar to the Moon • Bright craters and dark plains • Smooth plains associated with impact craters and basins

  5. Mariner 10 Observations • No observations made that could determine elemental abundances, specific minerals, or rock types on Mercury • Mariner 10 observed day side albedos of Mercury and the Moon • Dark plains would have a lower albedo than a bright crater • Mercury’s albedo lower overall than the Moon’s by a few percent, but in the visible it has a higher albedo • Mercury’s albedo varies across its surface and at different wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm • Composition, grain size, and porosity plays key roles in explaining a planet’s albedo • Finely crystalline silicates low in Fe and Ti tend to be brighter and scatter more light off of the surface • New measurements from SOHO paired with Mariner 10 data looked at phase angle and backscattering • Results indicate Mercury’s surface has smaller grains and more transparent than the Moon, and the higher efficiency of reflecting light towards the sun indicates the presence of complex or fractured grains

  6. Re-calibration of Mariner 10 Images • Technique first used on lunar data • Robinson and Lucey 1997 • Use 375nm (UV) and 575nm (VIS) bands • Ratio UV/VIS • Plot UV/VIS versus VIS • As FeO increases and soils mature spectrum reddens and UV/VIS decreases • As opaque minerals increase the albedo decreases and increases the UV/VIS • Rotate axis to decouple FeO+maturity from opaque index

  7. Re-calibration of Mariner 10 Images • FeO + maturity • Brighter tone indicate decreasing FeO and maturity VIS image • Opaque Index • Brighter tone indicate increasing opaque minerals • UV/VIS image • Brighter tone indicate increasing blueness

  8. Remote Sensing of Planetary Bodies

  9. Remote Sensing of Planetary Bodies Spectroscopy • Visible light (0.4 - 0.7 m) • Near-IR (0.7 - 2.5 m) • Mid-IR (2.5 - 13.5 m)

  10. Visible to Near-IR spectroscopy • Measuring reflected light • Absorption bands are created from electronic transitions in the molecules bonded in the lattices of silicates • Interested in 0.3 - 0.5 and 1.0m bands associated with FeO • Spectral contrast of features can be diminished due to space weathering • Spectral slope - indication of the maturity and composition • Fit straight line from 0.7 - 1.5m • Slope of line increases as soil matures • Look at ratios to determine soil maturity and FeO and opaque mineral content • Again -- techniques used originally on the Moon

  11. Visible to Near-IR results • Weak 1m band detected during 1 observation run - only in bright materials • Shape and width of 1m band indicative of Ca-rich clinopyroxene • Mercury’s spectral slope has a higher value than the spectral slope from immature to submature regions on the Moon • Low FeO (0 - 3%) and TiO2 (0 - 2%)

  12. Mid-IR spectroscopy • Measuring emitted light • Absorption bands are caused by the vibration, bending, and flexing modes of the crystalline lattices • Grain size and composition of mineral samples greatly affect spectra • Compare key spectral features diagnostic of composition with spectra of rocks and minerals measured in the laboratory • Reststrahlen bands - fundamental molecular vibration bands in the region from 7.5 - 11 mm • Emissivity maxima (also known as the Christensen feature) - associated with a silicate spectrum and occurs between 7 - 9 mm • Transparency minima - associated with the change from surface scattering to volume scattering and occurs between 11 - 13 mm • Good indicator of SiO2 weight percent in rock • Highly depends on the quality of spectral libraries built from laboratory measurements of rocks and minerals

  13. Diagnostic Spectral Features CF RB TM

  14. Grain Size and Composition Effects in the Mid-IR • Varying the grain size changes the depth/or existence of spectral features • Varying the composition changes the location of spectral features

  15. Mid-IR results • Mercury’s surface composition is heterogeneous • Most spectra match models of plagioclase feldspar with some pyroxene • Plagioclase more sodium-rich than that on the Moon • Pyroxene low-Fe, Ca-rich diopside or augite or low-Fe, Mg-rich enstatite • Bulk compositions indicate an intermediate silica content (similar to diorite or andesite on Earth) • No evidence for Fe- and/or Ti-bearing basalts as lava flows as seen on the Moon

  16. Observing Mercury and the Moon in the mid-IR • NASA Infared Telescope Facility (IRTF) using Boston University’s Mid-Infrared Spectrometer and Imager • IRTF allows for pointing telescope near the sun • MIRSI covers the 8 - 14 m spectral range • Mercury - daytime observations • Moon - day and night time observations • Locations on the lunar surface with well known composition from near-IR telescopic observations and Apollo sample returns chosen

  17. How does a spectrometer work?

  18. The Moon - Grimaldi Basin

  19. Grimaldi and Laboratory Spectra Comparison • Grimaldi spectra compare well in overall shape with the RELAB Impact Melt and Breccia spectra • Grimaldi spectra also compare well with Salisbury et al. NoriteH2, in particular 11 – 13 μm region • No perfect matches yet, but indicates our results are reasonable

  20. Mercury 250 - 260 200 - 210 175 - 185

  21. Spectral Deconvolution • Ramsey (1996) and Ramsey and Christensen (1998) developed algorithm and provided in ENVI by Jen Piatek • Inputs – spectrum to be deconvolved, spectral library of pure mineral spectra, and wavelength region to be fit over • Spectral library of 337 end-members created with reflectance spectra of fine and coarse grain minerals (ASTER, RELAB, USGS, ASU and BED) • When minerals in an assemblage are present in library, algorithm determines abundances within 5% • Previous successes for whole rocks, meteorite samples and plagioclase sands include: Hamilton et al. (1997), Feely and Christensen (1999), Hamilton and Christensen (2000), Wyatt et al. (2001), and Milam et al. (2007)

  22. Spectral deconvolution results for Mercury Feldspar • An90-10 (Bytownite - Oligoclase) K-spar • Orthoclase or Sanidine Pyroxene • Hypersthene, Enstatite, and Diopside Olivine • Mg-rich (Fo66-89) TiO2 • Rutile Small amounts of garnet • Mg- and Ca-rich garnets

  23. What do and don’t we really know? • Surface composition heterogeneous • Feldspar-rich of moderate Ca and Na • Low-Fe pyroxenes and olivines present • Low FeO content (up to 3%) • No observations contradict the scenario of early core formation accompanied by global contraction of the planet • Extrusive lava flows on the surface are likely low in SiO2 and enriched in K and Na • Not clear about space weathering - different than the Moon • Still not enough info to constrain evolution and thermal history models • Still unsure of link between surface and exosphere

  24. MESSENGER • Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) • UVVS covers 88.4 – 254.2 nm • VIRS covers 216.5 – 1395.2 nm • Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS) • 12 filters over the 395 – 1040 nm spectral range • Gamma Ray and Neutron Spectrometer (GRNS) • Will measure cosmic-ray excited elements O, Si, S, Fe, and H • Will measure naturally radioactive K, Th, and U • X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) • Will measure K lines for Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Ti, and Fe

More Related