1 / 52

EDD 5229 Liberal Studies in Knowledge Society Lecture 4 Understanding the

EDD 5229 Liberal Studies in Knowledge Society Lecture 4 Understanding the Curriculum Content of Liberal Studies I: Self, Identity and Interpersonal Relationship in individualized society. Understanding the Structure of the Areas of Study: Self and Personal Development.

carolef
Download Presentation

EDD 5229 Liberal Studies in Knowledge Society Lecture 4 Understanding the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EDD 5229 • Liberal Studies in Knowledge Society • Lecture 4 • Understanding the • Curriculum Content of Liberal Studies I: • Self, Identity and Interpersonal Relationship in individualized society

  2. Understanding the Structure of the Areas of Study: Self and Personal Development • The formal structure outlined by the CCD and HKEAA • Module 1: Personal development and interpersonal relationship • Theme1: Understanding oneself • Theme2: Interpersonal relationship

  3. Theories of Personal Identity • Two paradigms of self and identity formations • Essentialism: Essentialism in identity studies refers to approaches which takes social identity, such as gender, ethnicity, race, nationality, class, as objectively exiting reality. Their formations are based on some essentially fixed traits such as biological sex, skin color, place of birth, formal-legal status, level of income, etc. • Constructionism: Constructionism in identity studies refers to perspective which conceives identity as socially constructed reality. They are on one hand collectively constituted in social processes or even political movements, and on the other hand individually ascription in deliberate articulations.

  4. Theories of Personal Identity • Two levels of identity Studies of identity have been a multidisciplinary area of inquiry. It could be approached from psychologists, sociological or philosophical perspectives. Nevertheless, identity has often be studied either at personal or collective levels. • Personal identity: It refers to the self-description, self-image, or self-conception that an individual assigned upon herself. One of its fundamental features is the uniqueness of the selfhood. • Social Identity: It refers to social-role performance that individuals subscribe themselves or expected by others and/or membership of social categories that individuals applied to themselves or imposed upon by others. One of its fundamental features is its similarities with others members of the social categories concerned.

  5. Theories of Identity Development • Two levels of identity Though these two levels of identity can analytically be differentiated, in reality they are closely interconnected or even coherently integrated. For example, Anthony Giddens has coined the concept of self-identity to depict such a phenomanon.

  6. Theories of Identity Development • Theory of the self in symbolic interactionism • The “looking-glass” self: Charles Cooley coined the concept in 1902 to indicate the developmental process of the self as an interpersonal process. It is a reflexive and glass-looking process consisting of • “the image of out appearance to the other person; • “the imagination of his judgment of that appearance; and • “some sort of self-feeling, such as pride or mortification.” (Cooley, 1902, p. 184; quoted in Broom, 1981, p. 98) • Accordingly, to Cooley the self is not some inborn attributes but social products generated from interactions with other fellow humans. Furthermore, the self is not a passive receiver of others’ judgments on oneself. It will actively interpret and react to these judgments.

  7. Theories of Identity Development • The “looking-glass” self: Finally, Cooley specifies that the others or the looking glasses, from which one takes reference are not assigned with equal importance by the self. As a result, some others are characterized as “significant others” (i.e. parents) while others are simply “referent others” (i.e. ordinary friends)

  8. Theories of Identity Development • Symbolic interactionist’s conception of the self • Built on Charles Cooley’s concept of the “looking-glass” self, George H. Mead and Herbet Blumer, two founding father of the symbolic interactionsim (a prominent theoretical perspective in sociology) specify that the self is not a static structure but a dynamic process through which attributes, meanings, judgments that others passed onto oneself will be interpret and reinterpret. That is they “saw the self as process not a structure.” (Blumer, 1969, p.62) • “The process of a self provides the human being with a mechanism of self-interaction. …Such self-interaction takes the form of making indications to himself and meeting these indications by making further indications. The human being can designate things to himself – his wants, his pains, his goals, object around him, the presence of others, their actions, their expected actions, or whatnot.” (Blumer, p. 62)

  9. Theories of Identity Development • Symbolic interactionist’s conception of the self • “With the mechanism of self-interaction the human being ceases to be a responding organism whose behavior is a product of what plays upon him from the outside, the inside, or both. Instead, he acts toward his world, interpreting what confronts him and organizing his action on the basis of the interpretation.” (Blumer, p.63) • The negotiated self: In the perspective of symbolic interactionsim, individuals are perceived as “an active agent in the construction of his or her own self-concept. The self that emerges is a negotiated self. …An important goal in this (negotiating) process is the enhancement of self-esteem.” (Brinkerhoff et al. 1991, p. 144)

  10. Theories of Identity Development • The situated self: Another group of interactionists has adopted a more structural approach (structural school) to the conception of the self. • These sociologists, such as McCall and Simons (1978) and Stryker (1968, 1980), emphasize the importance of the institutional structure in which individuals are situated. It is suggested that the self emerged from this situation will be conditioned by social expectations or even obligations prescribed to the positions, in which the individual is assigned into.

  11. Theories of Identity Development • The situated self: • The concepts of role and role-identity: • The concept of role refers to the performances expected of the occupant of a given position or social status, such as the roles of a daughter, a wife, a teacher or a HKSAR citizens. • The concept of role identity signifies that a role occupant has internalized the role expectations and performances prescribed by external social institution to become part of her own self. It is exactly through this process of internalization of the externalities of the social institution that an individual self is amalgamated with a social role and as a result constituted a social identity.

  12. Theories of Identity Development • The situated self: • The concept of role set and role conflict: • The concept of role set refers to the network of multiple roles that an individual has to engage with at the same time or once at a time. For example, a teacher may simultaneously be a daughter, a wife and a mother. • The expectations and performance of these multiple roles are most likely to be in conflict. As a result, an individual may experience the inter-role conflict. For example, in performing the role of a school teachers may in conflict with the role of a mother and a wife. Furthermore, a role occupant may also experience intra-role conflict as there may be discrepancies among role expectations from different role partners of a role. For example, a teacher may face conflicting expectations from her students, fellow teachers and school head.

  13. Theories of Identity Development • The situated self: • Identity hierarchy: Confronted with inter-role conflict, an individual's identities have to set priority with these competing role identities. Hence, the concept of identity hierarchy refers to the resolution that an individual has to sort out in situation of inter-role conflict.

  14. Theories of Identity Development • Theory of categorization and social identity • Apart from interactionalist perspective of analyzing how an individuals internalizes role expectations and performances into their selves and constitutes her role-based identity, Henri Tajfel and his followers most notably John C. Turner look at formation of group identity formation as a social process of categorization. • This tradition of identity study begins with the concept of categorization. It refers to “the cognitive process that allow human to streamline perception by separately grouping like and unlike stimuli. Tajfel demonstrated that people categorize social as well as nonsocial stimuli and that people use social categories to identify themselves and others.” (Thoits and Virshup, 1997; p. 114) Tajfel illustrate the concept with research focusing on race, ethnicity, class, and nationality and empirical examples of back and white, Jews, Pakistanis, and French- and English speaking Canadian.

  15. Theories of Identity Development • Social identity and theory of categorization • Accordingly, Tajfel defines social identity as “that part of an individual’s self which derives from his knowledge of his members of a group (or groups) together with the value and emotional significance attached to that membership.” (Tajfel, 1981, quoted in Thoits and Virshup, 1997; p. 116) • Turner also defines “social identity as “self-categories that define the individual in terms of his or her shared similarities with members of certain social categories in contrast to other social categories.” (Turner et al, 1987, quoted in Thoits and Virshup, 1997; p. 117)

  16. Theories of Identity Development • Social identity and theory of categorization • For Turner, social identities are in-group versus out-group categorizations. It spawns out of the distinction between the we-group and the they-group. • This perspective has elevated the identity study from the individual level of role identity to the collective level of identity based on ethnicity, nationality, social class, and other social groupings. As a result, identity theory can apply to analyze macroscopic phenomena such as racial prejudice and discrimination, conflict between ethnic and national groupings, ethnocentrism, etc

  17. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Anthony Giddens’ conception of self-identity • Giddens defines “self as reflexively understood by the person in terms of her or his biography.” (Giddens’ 1991, p. 53) • Identity, according to Giddens, indicates a person’s sense of “continuity across time and space.” (ibid)

  18. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Anthony Giddens’ conception of self-identity • Self-identity, therefore, can be defined as a sense of “continuity as interpreted reflexively by the agent.” (ibid) More specifically, a person with a reasonably stable sense of self-identity is, therefore, the one with “the capacity to keep a particular narrative going. The individual’s biography, if she is to maintain regular interaction with others in the day-to-day world, cannot be wholly fictive. It must continually integrate events which occur in the external world, and sort them out into ongoing ‘story’ about the self.” (Giddens, 1991, p. 54) In short, self-identity can be discerned as coherent and continuous narrative one imputed to oneself.

  19. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Anthony Giddens’ conception of self-identity • Constituents of self-identity: A stable self-identity, i.e. coherent and continuous self narrative, would compose the following attributes • Ontological security: “A stable sense of self-identity presupposes the … elements of ontological security - an acceptance of the things and of others.” (ibid) The sense of ontological security implies that a person has to extend beyond self-reflexion and connects to her or his environments, both physical and social. In turn, it will generate both sense of trust and bondage with the physical and social environments.

  20. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Anthony Giddens’ conception of self-identity • Constituents of self-identity: • Trust: Trust can be construed as the confidences and expectations that a person invested on particular relationships with social and physical environments. It is generally evolved from the positive feedbacks obtained by the person in the particular relationships. • Bondage: As the positive feedback generated from a relationship with a human aggregate accumulated, the person involved will develop strong sense of belonging to it and in turn constitute a social bondage. As a result, a “social identity” develops.

  21. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization in Risk Society • The process of individualization • “Modernization does not just lead to the formation of a centalized state power, to concentrations of capital and to an ever more tightly woven web of division of labor and market relationship, to mobility and mass consumption, and so on. It also leads …to a triple ‘individualization’: disembedding, removal from historically prescribed social forms and commitments in the sense of traditional contexts of dominance and support (the ‘liberating dimension’); the loss of traditional security with respect to practical knowledge, faith and guiding norms (the ‘disenchantment dimension’); and …re-embedding, a new type of social commitment (the ‘control’ or ‘reintegration dimension’). (Beck, 1992, p. 128)

  22. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity

  23. Theories of Identity in Late-Modernity • Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization in Risk Society • The process of individualization • “Modernization does not just lead to the formation of a centalized state power, to concentrations of capital and to an ever more tightly woven web of division of labor and market relationship, to mobility and mass consumption, and so on. It also leads …to a triple ‘individualization’: disembedding, removal from historically prescribed social forms and commitments in the sense of traditional contexts of dominance and support (the ‘liberating dimension’); the loss of traditional security with respect to practical knowledge, faith and guiding norms (the ‘disenchantment dimension’); and …re-embedding, a new type of social commitment (the ‘control’ or ‘reintegration dimension’). (Beck, 1992, p. 128)

  24. Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization: • The process of individualization • Beck’s definition of individualization: “‘Individualization’ means, first, the disembedding and, second, the ‘re-embedding’ of industrial society ways of life by new ones, in which the individuals must produce, stage and cobble together their biographies themselves. Thus the name ‘individualization’, disembedding and re-embedding …do not occur by chance, nor individually, nor voluntarily, nor through diverse types of historical conditions, but rather all at once and under the general conditions of the welfare in developed industrial labour society, as they have developed since the 1960s in many Western industrial countries.” (Beck, 1994, p.13)

  25. Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization: • The process of individualization • Zygmunt Bauman’s definition of individualization: “’Individualization’ consists of transforming human ‘identity’ from a ‘given’ into a task and changing the actors with the responsibility for performing that task and for the consequences (also the side-effects) of their performance. ….Human being are no more ‘born into’ their identities. … Needing to become what one is the feature of modern living - and of this living alone. …Modernity replaces the heteronomic determination of social standing with compulsive and obligatory self-determination.” (Bauman, 2000, p. 31-2)

  26. Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization: • The process of individualization • Institutionalized ‘beds’ - identity bases - for the re-embedment of modern individuals • ‘Beds’ in capital market, e.g. occupations, professions, social-class positions, etc. • ‘Beds’ in institution of marriage and family, husband, wife, father, mother, etc. • ‘Beds’ in modern political arenas, e.g. citizens, members of new social movements, such as environmentalists, feminist, anti-gloabizationists, etc

  27. Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization: • Individualization in Information Age • “What distinguished the ‘individualization’ of yore from the form it has taken in ‘risk society’ …. No ‘beds’ are furnished for ‘re-embedding’, and such beds as might be postulated and pursued prove fragile and often vanish before the work of ‘re-embeddment’ is complete. There are rather ‘musical chairs’ of various size and style as well as of changing numbers and positions, which prompt men and women to be constantly on the move and promise no ‘fulfilment’, no rest and no satisfaction of ‘arriving’, of rearching the final destination, where one can disarm, relax and stop worrying.” (Bauman, 2000, p. 33-34)

  28. Ulrich Beck’s Theory of Individualization: • Individualization in Information Age • The rise of networked individualism and cyber-balkanization “Networked individualism is a social pattern, not a collection of isolated individuals. Rather, individuals build their networks, on-line and off-line, on the basis of their interests, values, affinities, and projects.” (Castells, 2001, p. 131)

  29. Social Identity in the Process of Individualization • The conception of Individualization of modern society • “'Individualization' consists of transforming human ‘identity’ from a ‘given’ into a task and changing the actors with the responsibility for performing that task and for the consequences (also the side-effects) of their performance. ….Human being are no more ‘born into’ their identities. … Needing to become what one is the feature of modern living - and of this living alone. …Modernity replaces the heteronomic determination of social standing with compulsive and obligatory self-determination.” (Bauman, 2000, p. 32)

  30. Social Identity in the Process of Individualization • The conception of Individualization of modern society • “individualization means, first, the disembedding and, second, the re-embedding of industrial society ways of life by new ones, in which the individuals must produce, stage and cobble together their biographies themselves. Thus the name ‘individualization’, disembedding and re-embedding …do not occur by chance, nor individually, nor voluntarily, nor through diverse types of historical conditions, but rather all at once and under the general conditions of the welfare in developed industrial labour society, as they have developed since the 1960s in many Western industrial countries.” (Beck, 1994, p.13)

  31. Social Identity in the Process of Individualization • The conception of Individualization of modern society • Institutionalized ‘beds’ - identity bases - for the re-embedment of modern individuals • Beds’ in capital market, e.g. occupations, professions, social-class positions, etc. • ‘Beds’ in institution of marriage and family, husband, wife, father, mother, etc. • ‘Beds’ in modern political arenas, e.g. citizens, members of new social movements, such as environmentalists, feminist, anti-gloabizationists, etc.

  32. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Social identity crisis in the process of Individualization • “What distinguished the ‘individualization’ of yore from the form it has taken in ‘risk society’ …. No ‘beds’ are furnished for ‘re-embedding’, and such beds as might be postulated and pursued prove fragile and often vanish before the work of ‘em-rebeddment’ is complete. There are rather ‘musical chairs’ of various size and style as well as of changing numbers and positions, which prompt men and women to be constantly on the move and promise no ‘fulfilment’, no rest and no satisfaction of ‘arriving’, of researching the final destination, where one can disarm, relax and stop worrying.” (Bauman, 2000, p. 33-34)

  33. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Social identity crisis in the process of Individualization • Social identity crisis can therefore be conceived as a discontinuity between the stages of dis-embedment and re-embedment in the individualization process • Fragmentation of institutional-beds and the flexiblization of modern identity: Under the network logic and the global-information paradigm • National-local identity replaced by global-mobile identity • Affect-familial identity replaced by flexible-familial identity • Permanent vocationalism and unionism replaced by flexible, self-programmed workers

  34. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Social identity crisis in the process of Individualization • The permeation of pure relation growth: • By pure relationship, according to Giddens, it is social relationship build “purely” on the relationships itself. It differs from traditional relationships which are based on institutional bondages, such as parent-child relationships, or based on institutional restraints, such as marriage and business contracts. Instead, pure relationship “is not anchored in external conditions of social or economic life - it is …free-floating. ….The pure relationship is sought only for what the relationship can bring to the partners involved. …(It) is reflexively organized, in open fashion, and on a continuous basis” (Giddens, 1991, p. 89-91)

  35. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • The permeation of pure relation growth: • Pure relationships are by definition “double edged”. • They provide reflexive or even emancipatory chances for reconstituting traditional social relationship. They offer opportunity for the development of trust based on voluntary commitments and an intensified intimacy.” (p. 186) • Yet pure relationship …create enormous burdens for the integrity of the self. In so far as a relationship lacks external referents, it is morally mobilized only thorough ‘authenticity. …Shorn of external moral criteria, the pure relationship is vulnerable as a source of security at fateful moments and at other major life transitions.” (p. 186-7)

  36. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • The permeation of pure relation growth: • As a result, the story of the self can no longer be told in a continuous and coherent manner. In other words, the self-identity experiences sense of discontinuity and fragementation, i.e. ontological insecurity and extistential anxiety in Giddens’ terms.

  37. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Zygmunt Bauman’s cultural identity of postmodernity • The pilgrim as modern self: Pilgrimage of entrepreneurs, tenured workers, citizens, civil soldiers, husband and wife, etc. • Life strategy of postmodern self: • Strollers: It signifies the life strategy and state of mind of strolling in shopping malls, “finding oneself among strangers and being a stranger to them, taking in those strangers as ‘surfaces’. ….Strolling means rehearsing human reality as a series of episodes, that is as events without past and without consequences. It also means rehearsing meeting as mis-meeting, as encounters without impacts. …The stroller had all the pleasures of modern life without torments attached.” (Bauman, 1996, p. 26-27)

  38. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Zygmunt Bauman’s cultural identity of postmodernity • Life strategy of postmodern self: • Vagabond: It represents the life strategy and attitude of wondering aimlessly and without destination. It also signifies life strategy of unwilling to settle down, to be the native and rooted in the soil. It post the stance of strangers and “being out of place” to every place and everyone. • Tourist: It represents another life strategy of movers, who “move on purpose”. The purposes that tourists have in mind are fun, joy, excitement and most of all careless. “One may say that what tourist buys, what he pays for, what he demands to be delivered … is precisely the right not to be bothered, freedom from any but aesthetic spacing.” (Bauman, 1996, p. 31)

  39. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Zygmunt Bauman’s cultural identity of postmodernity • Life strategy of postmodern self: • Player: “The player’s world is the world of risks, of intuition, of precaution-taking. Time in the world-as-play divides into a succession of games.” (p. 31) In other words, player’s world is made up of fragments and episodes of calculated risk. Yet more importantly, player must “make sure that no game leaves lasting consequences, the player must remember (and so must his/her partners and adversaruies), that ‘this is but a game’. …The game allows no room for pity, compassion, commiseration or cooperation.” (p.32)

  40. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Zygmunt Bauman’s cultural identity of postmodernity • The rise of networked individualism and cyber-balkanization “Networked individualism is a social pattern, not a collection of isolated individuals. Rather, individuals build their networks, on-line and off-line, on the basis of their interests, values, affinities, and projects.” (Castells, 2001, p. 131)

  41. Social Identity Crisis under Pure Relation • Zygmunt Bauman’s cultural identity of postmodernity • The rise of networked individualism and cyber-balkanization “Networked individualism is a social pattern, not a collection of isolated individuals. Rather, individuals build their networks, on-line and off-line, on the basis of their interests, values, affinities, and projects.” (Castells, 2001, p. 131)

  42. Growing up in the Information Age • The Hurried Child (Elkind, 1981) and Child without Childhood (Winn, 1984) • By simplifying the access to information through TV and then PC and Internet, it opens children to experiences that were once reserved for adults, e.g. sex and violence • By blurring the boundary between adults and children and revealing the secrecy of adults in electronic media, children are less deferential to adults’ authority and they become less likely to trust or respect simply because they are adults • “Growing up too fast too soon.” (Elkind, 1981) • “Growing up too fast in the world of sex and drug.” (Winn, 1984)

  43. Growing up in the Information Age • Disappearance of Childhood: • From literacy of printed materials to literacy of TV and then IT, the closure of adult world erodes and evaporates as the disclosure media of TV and then PC rise to dominance • These result in the exposure of the “backstage” of adulthood in front of screens of TV and then PC (Meyrowitz, 1985) and the disappearance of children (Postman, 1983) • Exposure of children to mass media (Sanders, 1995) and “unrestricted knowledge about things once kept secret from nonadults” (Steinberg and Kinchloe, 1997) have caused the death of childhood and the loss of the literal selves of children • The screenagers embrace discontinuity, turbulence and complexity. They have the natural adaptive skills that enable them to deal with the problem pf postmodernity. (Rushkoff, 1996)

  44. Growing up in the Information Age • The coming of the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998) and the screenagers (Rushkoff, 1996) • The Net Generation “have new powerful tools for inquiry, analysis, self-expression, influence, and play. They have unprecedented mobility. They are shrinking the planet in ways their parent could never imagine. Unlike television which was done to them, they are the actors in the digital world.” (Tapscott, 1998, P.3) • The psychological complex of the N-Generation • Tolerance and acceptance of diversity: “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” (p. 86) • A curious generation: The interactive world of the Internet elicits intensely heightened curiosity. • Assertiveness and self-reliance: “They begin to develop self-reliance at an early age: they can find what they need quickly, easily, and honestly” (p.87) in the Internet. • A contrarian generation: “Because they have master the tools to question, challenge, and disagree, these kids are becoming a generation of critical thinkers” (p. 88) and not easily submitted to authority at face value. • A generation of high self-esteem: They acquire the capacities to act on the environment and to mastery in the computer-mediated working environment at early age. They enhance their self certainty. They also learn to establish their identity through a much enlarged social world through the Internet. • Generation of multiple self and virtual self • A generation of intelligent / multi-intelligent: “Jean Piaget… argues that intelligence develops in all children through the continually shifting balance between the assimilation of new information into existing cognitive structure and the changing accommodation of those structures themselves to incorporate the new information.” Internet and other computer-mediated environments provide ample opportunities of the kind. • A generation of stronger spatial orientation • A generation of divergent and multi-media thinking

  45. Growing up in the Information Age • The coming of the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998) and the screenagers (Rushkoff, 1996) • The Net Generation “have new powerful tools for inquiry, analysis, self-expression, influence, and play. They have unprecedented mobility. They are shrinking the planet in ways their parent could never imagine. Unlike television which was done to them, they are the actors in the digital world.” (Tapscott, 1998, P.3)

  46. Growing up in the Information Age • The coming of the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998) and the screenagers (Rushkoff, 1996) • The psychological complex of the N-Generation • Tolerance and acceptance of diversity: “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” (p. 86) • A curious generation: The interactive world of the Internet elicits intensely heightened curiosity. • Assertiveness and self-reliance: “They begin to develop self-reliance at an early age: they can find what they need quickly, easily, and honestly” (p.87) in the Internet. • A contrarian generation: “Because they have master the tools to question, challenge, and disagree, these kids are becoming a generation of critical thinkers” (p. 88) and not easily submitted to authority at face value.

  47. Growing up in the Information Age • The coming of the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998) and the screenagers (Rushkoff, 1996) • The psychological complex of the N-Generation • A generation of high self-esteem: They acquire the capacities to act on the environment and to mastery in the computer-mediated working environment at early age. They enhance their self certainty. They also learn to establish their identity through a much enlarged social world through the Internet. • Generation of multiple self and virtual self • A generation of intelligent / multi-intelligent: “Jean Piaget… argues that intelligence develops in all children through the continually shifting balance between the assimilation of new information into existing cognitive structure and the changing accommodation of those structures themselves to incorporate the new information.” Internet and other computer-mediated environments provide ample opportunities of the kind.

  48. Growing up in the Information Age • The coming of the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998) and the screenagers (Rushkoff, 1996) • The psychological complex of the N-Generation • A generation of stronger spatial orientation • A generation of divergent and multi-media thinking

More Related