170 likes | 181 Views
Understand magnetic particle inspection (MPI) techniques and grinding methods to measure SCC depth accurately. Explore limitations and benefits of dry MPI, wet fluorescent MPI, wet visible MPI, and black-and-white contrast MPI. Discover insights on SCC depth measurement research and evaluation results. Learn about the current research program for phased array UT characterization. Concluding remarks highlight the challenges and advancements in bell hole inspection methods to assess SCC severity effectively in pipelines.
E N D
Todd KedzieEl Paso Corporation Manager of Laboratory Services Bell Hole Inspection Techniques for Assessing SCC SeverityDecember 2, 2003
Introduction • Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) Techniques • SCC Depth Measurement by Grinding • SCC Depth Measurement Technology Research
Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) • MPI is an NDE method of inspection that uses fine magnetic particles (iron) that are applied to the part, and are attracted to any magnetic-leakage field created by an imperfection, such as SCC • Magnetic yokes are commonly used for bell hole MPI of pipelines • Each MPI method discussed is capable of detecting SCC, depending on field and pipeline operating conditions • No single MPI method is effective in all situations, therefore several methods must be available to choose from • MPI can be performed at all clock positions
Dry MPI Description: Dry MPI uses fine iron particles that are not suspended in a liquid. The iron particles are blown onto the pipe surface using a bulb or powder blower applicator. Iron particles are available in a variety of colors to obtain contrast with the pipe surface
Dry MPI • Limitations • Dry MPI method is not suitable for use when the pipe surface is wet (sweating, rain, etc.) • Least sensitive method of MPI
Wet Fluorescent MPI Description: Wet Fluorescent MPI uses fine iron particles that are suspended in a liquid (water or hydrocarbon). The iron particle suspension liquid is sprayed onto the pipe surface. The iron particles fluoresce in the dark when illuminated with a black light
Wet Fluorescent MPI • Limitations • Hydrocarbon suspension can result in a cloudy fluorescent background that can reduce the contrast between the indications and the background when inspecting coal tar coated pipelines • Requires dark background often provided by a tarp or tent for black light use
Wet Visible MPI • Description: Wet visible MPI uses fine iron particles that are suspended in a liquid (water or hydrocarbon). The iron particle suspension liquid is sprayed onto the pipe surface. The iron particles are visible, and do not require black light illumination • Limitations • Limited variety of colors for contrast
Black and White Contrast MPI • Description: Contrast MPI uses fine iron particles that are suspended in a liquid (hydrocarbon) that is sprayed onto the pipe surface. The surface of the pipe is painted prior to application of MPI in order to provide contrast with the visible iron particles • Limitations • Greater surface cleanliness required for white paint application • Contrast paint may increase the clean up time
Grinding Method to DetermineSCC Depth • Description: The population of SCC indications are assessed, and grinding is performed on selected indications. MPI is performed, and the depth of the SCC is measured when the indication has been removed • Limitations • Depth is only determinedfor those indications chosenfor examination • Grinding on loaded lines mustbe performed cautiously(see PRCI Pipeline RepairManual for additionalinformation)
SCC Depth Measurement Research PR-003-9718 • Description: Technologies from 16 companies were evaluated for SCC depth measurement • Technical Challenge: Accurately measuring the deepest crack within a colony using NDE from the same side as the cracking • 3 general types of technologies were studied • Ultrasonic based methods • Electromagnetic methods • Electromagnetic acoustic transducer methods
SCC Depth Measurement Research PR-003-9718 • Techniques were evaluated with the following criteria: • Accurate depth measurement for near-critical flaws • Accurate depth measurement for sub-critical flaws • Accurate discrimination of inconsequential cracks from cracks that may grow to failure though fatigue mechanism
SCC Depth Measurement Research PR-003-9718 • Results of research: • None of the techniques completely met the goal of a simple, low cost, operator independent sizing technique • Ultrasonic techniques were found to have the greatest potential for sizing SCC • Most successful techniques were: • Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) • Ultrasonic Phased Array. Note: This method provided a 3-dimensional examination of the cracks • Electromagnetic methods were found to consistently under estimate the crack depths. Improved technology, calibration methods, and cleaning procedures will be required for this method to become useful
Current SCC Depth Measurement Research GRI 8122 • Research program: • Application of phased array UT characterization in the field
Concluding Remarks • Current bell hole inspection techniques utilize MPI and grinding to determine SCC depth, length, orientation, and clock position • More advanced inspection methods have been evaluated, but none of these methods have proven to be capable of accurately measuring SCC depth • Most promising technologies (phased array UT characterization) are currently being evaluated
Todd KedzieEl Paso Corporation Manager of Laboratory Services Bell Hole Inspection Techniques for Assessing SCC SeverityDecember 2, 2003