350 likes | 393 Views
Explore the transition from Romanticism to Realism in 19th-century theatre, focusing on key playwrights and influential plays that shaped the era. Witness the shift towards naturalism and the impact of Henrik Ibsen’s controversial works on the theatrical landscape.
E N D
LATE 19TH CENTURY THEATRE Realism And Naturalism
Towards the end of the of the nineteenth century, audiences grew tired of the exaggerated forms of Romanticism and Melodrama • There was a movement towards the opposite – realism and naturalism • Audiences wanted to see real life characters in real life situations portrayed on stage
Realism • Scientific and technological breakthroughs were changing the world • More emphasis was placed on seeing reality in a scientific, factual manner • The Romantics based their ideals on the emotional and spiritual • The Realists emphasised ideas and proof, especially through observation
Psychology and psychiatry – the study of human behaviour was gaining recognition • People were starting to seek scientific answers to questions about what motivates our actions, or why we do things • Realism can be traced back to 1850 • By 1850 people began to study the influence of the environment on the person (including family background, work, culture, etc)
Playwrights • More interested in observing people • Wrote plays focusing on characters • Wrote plays focusing on contemporary society – or the real world • Playwrights believed they could change the world for the better if they could draw attention to the injustices of life
The Plays • No longer dealt with dramatised myths or historical events • New plays dealt with harsh realities of life • Represented on stage the problems in the world at the time
Plays were about: • Poverty • Homelessness • Prostitution • Other contemporary problems Some audience members were shocked. They preferred escapism and happily ever after melodramas.
Henrick Ibsen • 1828 – 1906 • Norwegian playwright • Best represents realism in drama • Ibsen’s plays had a profound effect on the future of theatre • His plays were controversial • No happy endings • Sometimes bad things happen to good people and vice versa
Ibsen’s Plays • Themes – divorce, unhappiness, diseases, role of women, depression, social problems • Characters were complex • Characters faced deep frustrations and struggles • Plays offered insights into the human mind and heart that were real and genuine, rather than what society wanted to hear
Ibsen’s Most Famous Plays • A Doll’s House • Hedda Gabler • Ghosts
Acting in Ibsen’s Plays • Given the nature of his plays, the style of acting had to change drastically from the previous melodramatic style • Characters in Ibsen’s plays spoke realistic dialogue, and all action on stage was believable
Naturalism of ‘A Slice of Life’ • Naturalism started in 1870s • Followers of Naturalism believed that realism did not go far enough • Playwright, Emile Zola (1840 – 1902), believed that a play on stage should be exactly as life of stage • The audience should see ‘a slice of life’
Naturalistic acting style • Acting became more life like • Storylines did not need to be fully developed because the audience was just seeing into real life episodes
Famous naturalistic Playwrights • Henri Becque • August Strindberg • Maxim Gorky • Anton Checkov
Stagecraft • Naturalistic plays created a need for a new breed of actors, designers and directors • Many individual practitioners set out to do their own thing • Andre Antoine founded Theatre Libre in Paris • He led the way in acting and staging these plays
Gordon Craig and Vsevolold Meyerhold created new styles of staging and lighting design • Europe was swept by pockets of small but innovative theatrical activity • In Russia, a collaboration between a director and theatre company would profoundly influence modern theatre and acting
Konstantin Stanislavski • Was director of the Moscow Art Theatre • Developed an acting method with his partner, Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko • This method acting system enabled actors to more fully enter the world of the characters they were playing on stage • The emphasis was on a totally believable performance
Speech and movement had to be as life like as possible • The way to understand character was through: research, observation, and empathizing with the character
Empathy meant imagining as fully as possible what it would be like to be in the character’s shoes • In the past actors had performed in a stereotyped, rigid manner • Stanislavski’s system recognised that every individual is unique and worth understanding
And so we see the birth of the common actor training system known asMethod Acting.