1 / 16

Is it Alive? Exploring the Boundaries of Life

This article discusses the challenging question of what defines life, exploring various definitions and criteria. It examines traditional definitions, alternative perspectives, and the subjective nature of determining life. It also delves into the complexities of categorizing artificial and theoretical life forms. By studying border cases and outliers, we can expand our understanding of life itself.

carrico
Download Presentation

Is it Alive? Exploring the Boundaries of Life

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is it Alive? By Will Pierce I400 Spring 2007

  2. A difficult Question • Many possible definitions • Each seems to exclude some living things while including non-living ones • Fundamentally limited by our lack of experience with life outside Earth • Carbon-and-water-based life is all we know

  3. Conventional Definition(Wikipedia) • Homeostasis • Self-regulation of internal temperature • Organization • Composed of one or more cells • Parts are interdependent • Metabolism • Consumption and conversion of non-organic material into energy • Growth • Both individual organisms and species population will grow in response to an abundance of energy

  4. Conventional Definition(Wikipedia) • Adaptation • Individual organisms adapt to circumstances and environment • Population as a whole evolves due to natural selection • Response to Stimuli • Ranging from very simple to very complex • Reproduction • Species population is able to autonomously expand via sexual or asexual reproduction

  5. Problems • Not all living organisms conform to all of these specifications • Classic example: The Mule, a genetic hybrid, is clearly alive but not able to reproduce • Viruses are unable to reproduce without a host • Certain ‘castes’ of insect species (i.e. worker ants) are sterile • Some non-living phenomena could be encompassed by these criteria • Fire can grow, reproduce, adapt to its environment, convert surrounding material into energy, maintain its internal temperature, and basically do everything else on the list • Computer programs can be made to perform most of the above functions as well

  6. Farmer and Belin • Life is a Pattern in Space-Time • Rather than a set of physical characteristics • Autonomous reproduction, if not in the organism itself, in a related organism • Covers mules, viruses, and worker ants • Storage and interpretation of a Self-image • Example: DNA (genotype) is interpreted by RNA to define an organism’s characteristics (phenotype) • Metabolism • Organisms such as viruses can make use of a host organism’s metabolism

  7. Farmer and Belin • Functional Interactions with the Environment • Interdependence of Parts • Stability Under slight Changes in Condition • Evolution

  8. Alternative Definitions • Schroedinger: Negative Entropy • Life maintains a low level of entropy by ‘exporting’ entropy • Entropy, as defined by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, states that in a closed system, all objects’ energy will move towards equilibrium • Living things derive a net increase in energy from their environment

  9. Alternative Definitions • Stuart Kauffman’s “Systemic” definition • Autonomous agent or multi-agent system capable of completing at least one thermodynamic work cycle • Self-organizing and self-producing (autopoietic)

  10. Still Problematic • All of these definitions, while insightful and generally workable, leave something to be desired • A mule, worker and, or virus would be “less alive” than an intelligent robot, by some criteria • Forces us to attempt some sort of physical definition (i.e. carbon chains) • Or we can adapt our definition to include certain forms of artificial or man-made life

  11. More Problems • Some criteria are too specific • Example: “genotype is separate and different from phenotype” • Applies to most but not all organisms • Example: Prions, a special type of virus, are mad up of a single protein, which carries both their genotype and phenotype • This can be misleading • Biochemical or thermodynamic definitions tend to exclude automata or computer intelligence, which are considered by some to be alive • Also excludes theoretical or extraterrestrial life that we have not yet encountered

  12. Highly Subjective • Dependent upon individual values and schemas • Can man-made entities truly be alive • Computer intelligence • Robots • Clones or genetic hybrids • Or are these just simulations of life? • Heavily dependent on personal values and prejudices

  13. Middle Ground • Some properties can be universally agreed upon • Response to stimuli, adaptation, self-organization • Not all criteria satisfied by all life forms • But we can all agree that a mule or a worker ant is alive despite inability to reproduce • Many non-living things satisfy some of our criteria • But we can all agree that fire is not alive, despite its ability to grow, adapt, maintain homeostasis, metabolize non-organic material, etc.

  14. Intuitive • For lack of a better terminology, we could say that we “just know” if most things are alive • Obviously there are grey areas • Hence the study of “theoretical life”, “artificial life”, etc.

  15. Study the Fringes • Most biological life can be easily categorized and defined by reasonable criteria • Theoretical life studies the oddities, exceptions, and borderline cases • These cases help to further our understanding and expand our thinking about what constitutes life • If we can assimilate these difficult cases into a unified definition of life, we can eliminate some of the confusion

  16. Conclusion • It seems nearly impossible at this point to come up with an all-encompassing definition of life that everyone can agree on • Best to agree on the most common characteristics, which define most life as we currently know it • Deal with the exceptions on a case-by-case basis

More Related