1 / 33

FINREP - Taxonomy Status

FINREP - Taxonomy Status. Mark Creemers (FINREP project team, National Bank of Belgium). Agenda. What is the FINREP-project? Extending IFRS-GP : Some Considerations Links between Taxonomy and Framework Current and Future Issues. What is the FINREP-project?. What is the FINREP-project?.

carrington
Download Presentation

FINREP - Taxonomy Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FINREP - Taxonomy Status Mark Creemers (FINREP project team, National Bank of Belgium)

  2. Agenda • What is the FINREP-project? • Extending IFRS-GP : Some Considerations • Links between Taxonomy and Framework • Current and Future Issues

  3. What is the FINREP-project?

  4. What is the FINREP-project? • Core Project Team: • Patrick Amis (Banque de France) • Jacobo Varela (Bank of Spain) • Giancarlo Pellizzari (Belgian BFIC) • Mark Creemers (National Bank of Belgium) • Objective - The FINREP taxonomy should: • perfectly reflect FINREP reporting framework • be easy to adapt to national supervisory needs • be consistent with other IFRS taxonomies

  5. What is the FINREP-project? • Timetable • Start: end of January 2006 • Intermediate versions in FINREP yahoo group • First "Public Working Draft" (version 0.3): • "Final" version for public comments (1.0):

  6. Taxonomy development process • Create brand new taxonomy • Cfr. COREP project. • Extend existing taxonomy • Cfr. IFRS-GP taxonomy (IASCF).

  7. Extending the IFRS-GP taxonomy • Advantages: • Creation • Don't create same element twice, possibly reuse existing presentation and calculation links. • Maintenance • Same underlying (frequently changing) standards: IFRS • Technical and Conceptual Harmonisation • Cross-Sector • IFRS-GP stands for General Purpose, although specific information for financial institutions is also included. • Intra-Sector • FINREP is a European framework AND not mandatory

  8. Extending the IFRS-GP taxonomy • Disadvantage: IFRS-GP = Read-Only • Structure: all elements in one schema file. • Don't change elements or their attributes • Tuples, Type, Balance attribute,... IFRS-GP: 90% Not Used Primary Items: 20% IFRS-GP 64% Not Used

  9. Extending the IFRS-GP taxonomy • Disadvantage: IFRS-GP does not use dimensions • Concepts (IFRS-GP) • Contexts (COREP)

  10. Extending the IFRS-GP taxonomy • Disadvantage: Timing-dependent on IFRS-GP Close consultation with IASCF needed! IASB: New / Modified IFRS CEBS: adapt FINREP framework IASCF: adapt IFRS-GP taxonomy CEBS: adapt FINREP taxonomy National Supervisors: adapt national extensions

  11. Links Taxonomy - Framework

  12. Links Taxonomy - Framework

  13. Links Taxonomy - Framework Equity Instruments Breakdown CounterParty Breakdown

  14. Links Taxonomy - Framework Create necessary Hypercubes

  15. Links Taxonomy - Framework CounterParty Breakdown Equity Instruments Breakdown Link Hypercubes to the Primary Items

  16. Links Taxonomy - Framework

  17. Links Taxonomy - Framework Primary Items Explicit Dimension: ConsoAppr Explicit Dimension: InvestTypes Typed Dimension: EntityName

  18. Links Taxonomy - Framework Explicit Dimension: ConsoAppr Explicit Dimension: InvestTypes Typed Dimension: EntityName "Fair Value of Investments in Associates with Price Quotations" is only applicable to Associates ==> Excluding Hypercube to exclude the Subsidiairies and Joint Ventures

  19. Links Taxonomy - Framework • Empty Hypercube ("No Dimensions Hypercube") • No empty dimension (cfr. COREP) • 3718 imported IFRS-GP elements not used ≥3718 links ==> Solution 1: National Extension ==> Solution 2: Application-Level xbrldt:targetRole!

  20. Links Taxonomy - Framework • Dimension-Default If one dimension-default arc exists in one extended link, then the default member is considered as defined in all the extended links where the dimension is used and the domain contains the domain member indicated in the target of the arc. The default member of a dimension MUST NOT appear in a context.

  21. Links Taxonomy - Framework • Dimension-Default (use case)

  22. Overview of FINREP Starting Point: “t-FINREP-2006-09-30.xsd" d-Counterpts: T 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 30, 33, 36 d-ValModel: T 9, 11 d-EqInstr: T 1, 5, 7, 30, 33 d-RelatParts: T 34 d-PastDue: T 7 d-Portfolio: T 17 d-FinAssets: T 17 d-ConsoAppr: T 12 d-EntityName: T 12, 39 (typed dimension) d-InvTypes: T 12 d-DBenefitPl: T 35 (typed dimension) d-ConsMov: T 39 (typed dimension)

  23. Links Taxonomy - Framework • Documentation (I) • FINREP EXCEL SAMPLE FIGURES.xls • Green to indicate the use of an explicit dimension • Light green to indicate the use of a typed dimension • Yellow to indicate formula, not part of calculation linkbase • Blue to indicate formula, part of calculation linkbase

  24. Links Taxonomy - Framework • Documentation (II) • Instance.xbrl: sample document for all tables, no duplicates • Presentation.pdf, Calculation.pdf, Definition.pdf

  25. Some technical remarks • Consistency with COREP • No tuples are used! ==> replaced by typed dimensions. • Data matrix has been created for FINREP. • Naming conventions are followed: • Hypercube-Roles and hypercubeItems start with "Hc" or "HcExcluded",... • How to extend FINREP? • Same principles as for COREP. • Integrated documentation on finrep.info or corep.info!

  26. Some Current and Future Issues • XBRL International • Formula Linkbase • Formulas should be part of the taxonomy. • Calculation linkbase is too limited for supervisory needs. • Different national solutions for same problem. • Integrate in national taxonomy-extensions? • Develop at application-level? • Versioning • FINREP = extension of IFRS-GP. • Quid future versions of IFRS-GP? • Quid future versions of FINREP?

  27. Some Current and Future Issues • FINREP is not FRTA-compliant! • xbrldt-2005.xsd • Element name 'hypercubeItem' does not have an initial capital letter • The concept 'http://xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt:hypercubeItem' does not have a label with the standard role • The concept 'http://xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt:hypercubeItem' does not have any documentation in the label or reference linkbases • ifrs-gp-2006-08-15.xsd • Namespace 'http://www.xbrl.org/2005/role/restatedLabel' contains insufficient path components for an XBRL International style URI. • FRTA not 100% well-adapted to Dimensions 1.0 • FRTA 1.0, Section 3.1.7: All arcs within an extended-type link must have the same arc role (all and notAll arcs in same extended link).

  28. Some Current and Future Issues • Modularization 99% of FINREP = Primary Items • Extension of monolithic IFRS-GP schema file. • Interdependencies between tables.

  29. Some Current and Future Issues • Modularization • Remedy 1: Use same structure as IFRS-GP for p-FINREP Interdependencies between tables (national application/extension)?

  30. Some Current and Future Issues • Modularization • Remedy 2: Add abstract dummies to easily prohibit tables in presentation, calculation and definition linkbase. This has not been tested and should be further investigated!

  31. Some Current and Future Issues • Modularization • Remedy 3: Different template taxonomies for each table.

  32. Some Current and Future Issues • Modularization • Conclusion 1: Discussion is still open! • Conclusion 2: Should be further investigated NOW! Remark: • Is there still time to create modularized version? • Quid providing 2 versions (modularized and monolithic)? • Won’t this lead to confusion for supervisors and banks? • Maintenance: 2 versions = 2 * work?

  33. Contact & Questions

More Related