1 / 9

UNECA/UNSD Regional Workshop November 2005

This workshop recommendations explore categorization and valuation issues in mineral exploration and deposits recording, aligning with the 1993 SNA guidelines and incorporating SEEA and IASB standards.

cartwrightc
Download Presentation

UNECA/UNSD Regional Workshop November 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNECA/UNSD Regional WorkshopNovember 2005 AEG Recommendations onMineral Exploration UN STATISTICS DIVISION Economic Statistics Branch UNSD/NA/MR 1

  2. Treatment in 1993 SNA • “mineral exploration” as a category of produced fixed asset. • “subsoil deposits’ as a category of non-produced assets. • Exploration, whether successful or not, is treated as gross capital formation.

  3. Calls for review of present treatment • Is the exploration activity separable from the value of the asset? • How to measure exploration activity? • How to value the deposit? • How to record payments by the extractor to the legal owner of the deposit? • In whose balance sheet is the deposit recorded?

  4. Since 1993 • SEEA examined these questions in depth and made detailed proposals. • Canberra-II Group scrutinised the SEEA and confirmed that the 1993 SNA needed clarification but not substantive change.

  5. AEG decisions: • Exploration activity is separable from deposits • The group agreed to maintain a distinction between: • ‘mineral exploration and evaluation’ as a produced asset and • the mineral deposit as non-produced assets.

  6. AEG decisions: Mineral exploration and evaluation • Change the item “mineral exploration” to “mineral exploration and evaluation” to make SNA compatible with the IASB coverage of this item. • Agreed that “mineral exploration and evaluation” is market production to be valued either at market prices, if purchased, or as the sum of costs plus mark-up, if produced on own-account.

  7. AEG decisions: How to value deposits • There are 3 options to value deposits: • Present value of net returns from exploitation • Market prices (seldom available) • Owner’s valuation • The group agreed that the preferred valuation for mineral deposits, market price, is seldom available. In default, the deposit should be valued as the present value of future receipts of resource rent.

  8. Decision on payments to owner of deposit • In principle, payments by the extractor to the owner of the deposit are property income. • However, when the owner is government and the payments are described as taxes, adhering to this principle introduces a discrepancy between taxes in the SNA and in government accounts. This needs further consideration. • The question of attribution of the ownership of a deposit extracted by a unit not the legal owner is deferred to a future meeting when leases and licenses will be discussed more generally.

  9. Thank You

More Related