1 / 14

What’s the value of nature tourism in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas?

What’s the value of nature tourism in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas?. Woosnam, An, Aleshinloye, Dudensing, and Hanselka March 2012. Background. Nature tourism defined:

carver
Download Presentation

What’s the value of nature tourism in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What’s the value of nature tourism in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas? Woosnam, An, Aleshinloye, Dudensing, and Hanselka March 2012

  2. Background • Nature tourism defined: • “Responsible travel to natural areas, which conserves the environment and improves the welfare of local people” (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 2011). • Takes various forms • Adopting D.K. Shiffletoperationalization • Lower Rio Grande Valley ideal for nature tourism • RG and Gulf with world-renowned birding opps. • Starr, Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Cos.

  3. Background • Texas is arguably best state for birding in country; LRGV #2 birdwatching destination in NA (Mathis and Matisoff, 2004). • Each year 1000s of Winter Texans flock to Valley, many of which are birders • Birders drawn from all over NA for Harlingen Birding Festival (in 19th year) • With shrinking chamber budgets, it is important to indicate the value of tourism in an area, especially niche forms of tourism

  4. Problem • Rapid residential development threatening natural areas in LRGV (Metrostudy, 2011). • Most recent economic impact study of nature tourism in LRGV conducted over 15 years ago—not in a scientific manner (Millar, personal communication, April 2011).

  5. Purpose of Study • Provide an initial examination of the economic impact of nature tourism throughout the LRGV during the off-peak tourist season • Three specific research questions (based on off-peak): • 1) What are the annual and person-day expenditures among nature tourists for 2011? • 2) What are the estimated total annual expenditures by nature tourists for 2011? • 3) What are the direct, indirect, and induced effects of nature tourism for employment, labor income, and value-added categories in the RGV in 2011?

  6. Methods • Sample and data collection • Off-peak visitors to LRGV • Intercepted at seven key locations (i.e., Estero Llano Grande SP, Bentsen Rio Grande SP, Santa Ana NWR, Edinburg Scenic Wetlands, Frontera Audubon, South Padre Island World Birding Center, Alamo Inn) • Six weekends in May/June 2011 using systematic sampling procedure (every 2nd) with random start • Self-administered survey instrument • Travel behavior, likelihood of returning, perception of region, travel expenditures (along with length of stay, group size, purpose of travel, etc.), and SOE/SOD questions • Effective response rate was 80.2% (N = 303)

  7. Descriptive findings • SOE/SOD • Mage = 47.4 years • 50.5% women • 76.8% had at least undergraduate degree • 44.4% had household income of at least $100,000 • Travel behavior • Mgroup size = 2.63 people • 51% visiting LRGV for nature tourism as primary purpose • Mstay in LRGV on current visit = 5 days • Mstay in LRGV during year = 7 days • 64% had visited LRGV previously, on average 15 times.

  8. Economic Impact Analyses • Economic impact analyses based on: • D.K. Shifflet reports provided to Texas Office of Governor, ED&T • 2010 South Texas Plains Region and 2010 Gulf Coast Region destination reports • 2010 Texas Visitor Profile • LRGV nature tourists reporting of: • Travel party size • # days planned to be in region (engaging in nature tourism) on trip and throughout year • Annual nature tourism expenditures in LRGV and elsewhere

  9. Findings—1st Research Question

  10. Findings—2nd Research Question

  11. Findings—3rd Research Question

  12. Conclusion and Implications • Sizable economic impact for nature tourism in LRGV • Help to make case for potentially preserving undeveloped areas in Valley. • Chambers and CVBs throughout LRGV should focus on promotional campaigns that continue to highlight area for natural resources • Bringing visitors to the area • Within days of receiving report, STNMC released press release that appeared all throughout South Texas newspapers and across state.

  13. Limitations and Future Research • Only collected data from off-peak nature tourists • Data from peak nature tourists was collected in Fall/Winter 2011 • Will be used in subsequent analyses • Data collected from seven key locations; not all places • Only used “intentional” nature tourists and not “casual” nature tourists in analysis

  14. Thank you! Questions? Or Comments?

More Related