1 / 20

Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies

Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies. Jerry Sellwood. The story so far. Four serious problems with the hot big bang model were solved in one attractive stroke What caused inflation? How does it work? Questions still without clear answers But the idea is very appealing

casey-chase
Download Presentation

Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood

  2. The story so far • Four serious problems with the hot big bang model were solved in one attractive stroke • What caused inflation? How does it work? • Questions still without clear answers • But the idea is very appealing • We can test two key predictions: • universe really should be flat – i.e.  = 1 • power spectrum of density fluctuations

  3. Is the universe flat? • Astronomers could not find enough matter • Expressed as fractions of crit, we find • stars in galaxies 0.5% • all normal atoms 4% (from BBN) • dark matter: not more than 20% – 30% • Increasing confidence that the mass density was less than critical • Crisis for inflation

  4. Accelerating Universe • Gravity attracts and slows expansion of the universe • Should see more rapid expansion in the past • i.e. at large distances or high redshift • Type Ia supernovae seem to be “standard candles” – more distant ones are fainter • Slowing expansion: apparent brightness should decrease less rapidly with redshift • data showed the opposite!

  5. Dark Energy • Supernovae data alone not all that convincing (e.g. possible systematic errors) • But CMB measurements (and theoretical prejudice) suggest universe is in fact flat • Can save inflation if 70% of the critical density is a new component: Dark Energy • Gravitationally repulsive to cause acceleration • We have resurrected Einstein’s cosmological constant with= 0.7 so M +  = 1

  6. Cosmic microwave background • NASA’s WMAP measured temperature differences in CMB from point to point • Blue is cooler than mean, red is hotter • T/T  10-5 (i.e. measurements aren’t easy!)

  7. Origin of fluctuations • Curvature fluctuations laid down during inflation • Slight density differences affect the expansion rate relative to the mean • Differences amplify since they were created • Overdense regions are slightly warmer • Underdense regions are slightly cooler • Two-thirds counteracted by gravitational redshift

  8. Fluctuation power spectrum • Want to quantify the fluctuations on different angular scales • Expand in surface harmonics, Ylm(or multipoles) • Compute the total power at each l Points with error bars are data (scatter with m) Red line is a fitted theoretical model

  9. Acoustic oscillations Fluctuations are superpositions of many waves of different scales Each wave begins to oscillate once  is inside the horizon We get peaks in the power at max compression and rarefaction

  10. Standard ruler • For the first peak at about 1, we know • the oscillation period and thus the time since waves entered the horizon • the expansion rate, and can therefore calculate the linear scale of these waves • We also measure the angular scale • So we can determine the curvature of the universe! • Find that it must be flat – within the errors

  11. Growth of structure • The universe was very smooth at z1100 • Not today – stars & planets, galaxies, and clusters of galaxies formed somehow • Computer simulations needed • start from “reasonable” initial conditions • treat baryons and dark matter in same way as a 1st approximation • choose a box size and make it periodic • fill it with particles – almost uniformly • compute forces on particles and step forward in time

  12. Kravtsov et al • Expansion is not shown – positions are in co-moving coordinates

  13. Appear successful Dark matter forms dense clumps connected by a “cosmic web” of filaments Resembles observed galaxy distribution Comparison requires a rule to assign galaxies within mass clumps

  14. Power specturm • Data points with error bars are from 2dFGRS • Line is the average power spectrum from 35 simulations with a (physically reasonable) rule for assigning galaxies • Agreement is impressive

  15. Dark Matter halos • Dark matter clumps are called halos • Every halo has many sub-halos • Examine the mass profiles of the halos

  16. “Universal” halo density profile • Spherically averaged density of dark matter seems to approximate the form: (r) = s rs3 / [r(r+rs)3-] • i.e. a broken power law, with 1 <  < 1.5 •  = 1  is “NFW”

  17. Concentration • The cosmology papers do not use s directly, but define a new parameter c • They define , r200, within which the average density is 200crit • halo approximately settled • and then set c = r200/rs • Furthermore, c correlates mass – halos are predicted to be a 1-parameter family

  18. Clear and testable predictions • If only we could measure DM halos directly • we see only baryons, which are distributed differently • Gas cools in DM halos • Settles into a rotationally supported disk • Compresses the halo as it cools • Forms stars etc.

  19. More simulation needed • Governato et al • Dark matter + gas + stars • Promising disk + bulge • embedded in a DM halo

More Related