1 / 11

SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit

SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit. Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team. SOT focus design.

casey
Download Presentation

SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SOT optical performanceFocus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team SOT17 @ NAOJ

  2. SOT focus design • OTA is designed to provide collimated beam into FPP in air, and provides a weakly converging beam (f200m) in vacuum. Air-to-vacuum difference of the focus position of OTA and FPP are adjusted by initial setting of the “re-imaging lens” position. • The 4 optical paths (BFI, NFI, SP, and CT) are designed to be kept in co-focal without any focus adjustment. SOT17 @ NAOJ

  3. Focus adjustment by the re-imaging lens • Focus shift originating in OTA and FPP can be compensated by movement of the re-imaging lens along the optical axis during the mission operation. We plan to adjust the focus position occasionally to compensate seasonal variation. • No need to adjust the position within one orbital cycle because orbital variation is supposed to be negligible. • Mechanisms for the motion of the re-imaging lens have the specifications shown below. Reimaging lens M2 M1 SOT17 @ NAOJ

  4. Focus shift in orbit • Focus shift is caused by displacement of optical elements along the optical axis. The change of M1-M2 distance is most sensitive to the focus shift. • Mechanical environmental (vibration and acoustic) tests showed no significant change in focus position. • The thermal environment in orbit is very different from that on the ground. In order to predict the focus shift in orbit, we performed thermal-optical test of the telescope, and determined the defocus sensitivity for major components experimentally. • Focus errors (including margins) are controlled by a focus error budget table. The focus position is confirmed to be well within adjustable range by the re-imaging lens for the mission period. SOT17 @ NAOJ

  5. Focus position in the first light phase • After the telescope top-door is opened, the temperatures inside the telescope increase, and are settled within several hours. • The telescope main structure is made of CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastic). The dehydration of CFRP makes M1-M2 distance smaller in vacuum. The speed of the shrinkage is temperature dependent. SOT17 @ NAOJ

  6. Focus shift by CFRP dehydration Just after launch 1 month (?) later M2 M2 M1 M1 0mm -8.3mm  -4.2mm SOT17 @ NAOJ

  7. Temperature dependence of CFRP dehydration 2nd test on May 2004 OTA temperature was kept 20C during the test. A20 (lambda, DP) Time constant  400hrs Time (hour) 4th test on Mar 2005 Focus position did not change during the cold mode. Cold mode Hot mode Time (hour) SOT17 @ NAOJ

  8. Orbital variation by temperature ripple • The temperature prediction in orbit tells that there is 1-2C temperature ripple within one orbital cycle especially around M2. • The focus shift within one orbital cycle is expected to be around 0.2mm at the re-imaging lens focus. This corresponds to one or two steps of the focus adjustment, and is within focal depth. Temperature and focus ripple within one orbital cycle (Only major components are shown in the table.) SOT17 @ NAOJ

  9. Focus change between DC and Limb obs. • In limb observations, heat inputs to the telescope become smaller than those in DC obs. This makes the temperatures 1 - 2 C lower. • This temperature change causes small focus shift, but the shift is expected to be about 0.1mm, and is negligible. Temperature and focus change between DC and Limb obs. (Only major components are shown in the table.) SOT17 @ NAOJ

  10. Long-term focus shift • Because of the contamination on the mirror surface, the temperature inside the telescope tends to increase gradually through the mission life. • The temperature increase causes gradual focus shift, and will be compensated by the re-imaging lens. Temperature and focus change through the mission life (Only major components are shown in the table.) SOT17 @ NAOJ

  11. Summary • The orbital and DC-Limb variation are expected to be 1-2 steps of the focus adjustment, and well within focal depth. • We should verify orbital and DC-Limb variation in the first light phase. • The seasonal and long-term focus shift will be compensated by occasional adjustment of the re-imaging lens position. SOT17 @ NAOJ

More Related