1.21k likes | 1.78k Views
Prediction and prevention of OHSS - an evidence-based approach. Hassan N. Sallam, MD, FRCOG, PhD (London) Professor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Alexandria, and Clinical and Scientific Director, Alexandria Fertility Center, Alexandria, Egypt.
E N D
Prediction and prevention of OHSS -an evidence-based approach Hassan N. Sallam, MD, FRCOG, PhD (London) Professor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Alexandria, and Clinical and Scientific Director, Alexandria Fertility Center, Alexandria, Egypt 3rd Congress of Society of Reproductive Medicine, 5 – 9 October 2011, Antalya / Turkey
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) Rabau et al, Am J Obstet Gynecol 98: 92, 1967
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a rareiatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation occurring during the luteal phase or during early pregnancy. It is potentially fatal and is difficult to predict. Fortunately, the reported prevalence of the severe form of OHSS is small, ranging from 0.5 to 5%.
OHSS – a potentially fatal complication Figueroa-Casas. Extraordinary ovarian reaction to gonadotropins: fatal case. Ann Circ (Rosario): 23: 116, 1958 Schenker and Weinstein. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a current survey. FertilSteril 30: 255, 1978 Fineschi et al. An immunohistochemical study in a fatality due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Int J Legal Med 120: 293, 2006 Madill et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a potentially fatalcomplication of early pregnancy. J Emerg Med 35: 283, 2008
Early and late OHSS Early onset OHSS 3 to 7 days after HCG Excessive response to stimulation Late onset OHSS 12 to 17 days after HCG Due to pregnancy Lyons et al, Hum Reprod. 9: 792, 1994; Mathur et al, Fertil Steril 73: 901, 2000
Classification (grading) of OHSS Rabau et al, 1967 Schenker and Weinstein, 1978 Golan et al, 1989 Navot et al, 1992 Rizk and Aboulghar, 1999 Rabau et al, Am J Obstet Gynecol 98: 92, 1967; Schenker and Weinstein, Fertil Steril 30: 155, 1978; Golan et al, Obstet Gynecol Surv 44: 430, 1989; Navot et al, Fertil Steril 58: 249, 1992; Rizk and Aboulghar, Textbook of IVF and ART 9: 131, 1999
OHSS grading (Golan et al, 1989) Mild Moderate Severe
Pathophysiology of OHSS Pathophysiology of OHSS Pathophysiology of OHSS
Prevention of OHSS 1. Prediction of OHSS 2. Primary prevention (before starting HMG/FSH) 3. Secondary prevention (after starting HMG/FSH and before HCG administration)
Evidence-based medicine Level A –The recommendation based on good and consistent scientific evidence (RCT) Level B –The recommendation is based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence (CT, cohort, case control) Level C –The recommendation is based primarily on consensus and expert opinion
Prevention of OHSS 1. Prediction of OHSS 2. Primary prevention (before starting HMG/FSH) 3. Secondary prevention (after starting HMG/FSH and before HCG administration)
Prediction of OHSS (A) Risk factors: PCOS, young patients, low BMI, previous OHSS, pregnancy, genetic predisposition (B) Biochemical indices:Plasma oestradiol peak, insulin resistance, serum VEGF, von Willebrand factor, FSH, AMH (C) Ultrasound indices:PCO pattern, high AFC, ovarian volume, low intra-ovarian vascular resistance
Prediction of OHSS (A) Risk factors: PCOS, young patients, low BMI, previous OHSS, pregnancy, genetic predisposition (B) Biochemical indices: Plasma oestradiol peak, insulin resistance, serum VEGF, von Willebrand factor, FSH, AMH (C) Ultrasound indices: PCO pattern, high AFC, ovarian volume, low intra-ovarian vascular resistance
Polycystic ovary syndrome(Chereau, 1844; Stein and Leventhal, 1934) Read at a meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, November 1 to 3, 1934, New Orleans, La
Relationship between PCOS and OHSS Smitz et al, Hum Reprod 5: 933, 1990; MacDougall et al, Hum Reprod 7: 597, 1992; Delvigne et al, Hum Reprod 8: 1361, 1993
Relationship between BMI and OHSS Papnikolau et al, Fertil Steril 85: 112, 2006; Delvigne et al, Hum Reprod 9: 1361, 1993; Enskog et al, Fertil Steril 71: 808, 1999
Genetic predisposition to predict OHSS FSH FSH FSH receptor
Genetic predisposition to predict OHSS Daelemans et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6310, 2004
Prediction of OHSS (A) Risk factors: PCOS, young patients, low BMI, previous OHSS, pregnancy, genetic predisposition (B) Biochemical indices: Plasma oestradiol peak, insulin resistance, serum VEGF, von Willebrand factor, FSH, AMH (C) Ultrasound indices: PCO pattern, high AFC, ovarian volume, low intra-ovarian vascular resistance
Plasma E2 concentration to predict OHSS Cut-off value For E2 = 2560 ng/L For follicles >12 Papanikolau et al, Fertil Steril 85: 112, 2006
Insulin resistance to predict OHSS in PCOS Felghesu et al. JCEM 82: 644, 1997
Serum VEGF to predict OHSS Early onset OHSS Late onset OHSS Ludwig et al, Hum Reprod 13: 30, 1998
Von Willebrand factor to predict OHSS Todorow et al, Hum Reprod 8: 2039, 1993
Day 3 FSH to predict OHSS Cut-off point = 5.25 mIU/ml Onagawa et al, Gynecol Endocrinol 18:335-40, 2004
AMH to predict OHSS Cut-off value 33 years Cut-off value 3.36 ng/ml AMH Age BMI Cut-off value 18.44 Kg/m2 Lee et al. Hum Reprod 23: 160, 2008
AMH to predict ovarian response Elgindy et al, Fertil Steril 89:1670, 2008
Prediction of OHSS (A) Risk factors: PCOS, young patients, low BMI, previous OHSS, pregnancy, genetic predisposition (B) Biochemical indices: Plasma oestradiol peak, insulin resistance, serum VEGF, von Willebrand factor, FSH, AMH (C) Ultrasound indices: PCO pattern, high AFC, ovarian volume, low intra-ovarian vascular resistance
PCO pattern to predict OHSS Rizk and Smitz, Hum Reprod 7: 320, 1992; Delvigne et al, Hum Reprod 8: 1353, 1993
Antral follicle count(Tomas et al, 1997) Transvaginal ultrasound After ovarian suppression with GnRHa and before starting FSH Follicles 2 to 5 mm in both ovaries Patients with <5 follicles in both ovaries were poor responders Tomas et al, Hum Reprod 12(2):220, 1997
Trans-vaginal scan showing antral follicles Right ovary Left ovary
AFC to predict ovarian response Kwee et al, RBEJ 5:9, 2007
AFC to predict poor responders Kwee et al, RBEJ 5:9, 2007
AFC to predict hyper responders Kwee et al, RBEJ 5:9, 2007
AFC versus AMH to predict poor response AMH AFC Hendricks et al, Fertil Steril 83(2): 291, 2005 Broer et al, Fertil Steril 91: 705, 2009
AFC v/s AMH to predict hyper-response AFC AMH Broer et al, Hum Reprod Update 17: 46, 2011
Predictors of OHSS (Sallam et al, 2011) Sallam et al, Predictors of OHSS, submitted for publication
ROC curves comparing AMH and AFC AFC Cut-off value =>14 AMH Cut-off value 3.36 ng/ml Sallam et al, Predictors of OHSS, submitted for publication
Ovarian volume Cohen et al, AJR 160: 583, 1993; Orsini et al, Radiology 153:113, 1984; Sample et al. Radiology 125:477, 1977; Ivarsson et al, Arch Dis Child 58, 352, 1983
Ovarian volume Ivarsson et al, Arch Dis Child 58, 352, 1983
Ovarian volume to predict OHSS Danninger et al, Hum Reprod 11: 1597, 1996
Perifollicular blood flow to predict OHSS Oyesanya, Fertil Steril 65: 874, 1996
Intrafollicular hemodynamics to predict OHSS Oyesanya, Fertil Steril 65: 874, 1996
Combination of indices to predict OHSS Regression analysis showed that the dependent factors were: (1) Log oestradiol, (2) Slope of log oestradiol, (3) HMG dosage, (4) No. of oocytes retrieved and (5) LH/FSH ratio. The following formula was devised: PPV = 78.5 %; FNR = 18.1% Delvigne et al, Hum Reprod 8: 1353, 1993
Prevention of OHSS 1. Prediction of OHSS 2. Primary prevention (before starting HMG/FSH) 3. Secondary prevention (after starting HMG/FSH and before HCG administration)
Primary prevention (before starting HMG/FSH) FSH or HMG Low dose step-up protocol Step-down protocol Alternate day HMG/FSH Sequential protocol In-vitro maturation (IVM) GnRH antagonists