650 likes | 817 Views
Trends, seasonality and anomalies: making your time-series talk. Wladimir J. Alonso Fogarty International Center / NIH. Goals for of this talk. Learn how to extract the basic components of epidemiological relevance from a time-series
E N D
Trends, seasonality and anomalies: making your time-series talk Wladimir J. Alonso Fogarty International Center / NIH
Goals for of this talk Learn how to extract the basic components of epidemiological relevance from a time-series Learn how to explore the spatial patterns of those components Introduce the modeling tool Epipoi(www.epipoi.info)
A parenthesis for “Graphical Excellence” • well-designed presentation of interesting data – a matter of substance, statistics and design • consists of complex ideas communicated with clarity, precision and efficiency • is nearly always multivariate • requires telling the truth about the data • Provides the viewer with the greatest number of ideas in the shortest time with the least ink in the smallest space Edward Tufte (1983)
Napoleon's Retreat from Moscow, 1812by Illarion Pryanishnikov
Charles Joseph Minard (1861): Losses suffered by Napoleon's army in the Russian campaign of 1812 "It may well be the best statistical graphic ever drawn“ (Edward R. Turfte, 1983)
First: Organize your dataset in a meaningful way A typical mortality dataset
Time in a meaningful sequence Variables in meaningful sequence Structured spreadsheet as a source of instantaneous analysis • - Age groups • - Causes of deaths • Longitude • Latitude…
So you can plot in this way: Trends, anomalies, seasonality and even spatial can be seen Alonso et al 2011 Spatio-temporal patterns of diarrhoeal mortality in Mexico. Epidemiol. Infect
We can use this display to see the shift in the timing of RSV circulation in São Paulo city and its implications for immunoprophylaxis period of palivizumabe prophylaxis Paiva et al 2012 JMV
And then we can use a different plot for displaying the epidemiologic and putative explanatory series Paiva et al 2012 JMV
In fact, sometimes a simple organization of data in space can generate all the information we need! This is a quick example on how we found that (surprisingly!) the Northern hemisphere timing of the vaccine would be more efficient than the current Southern timing for Brazil Mello et al 2010 PLoS One
influenza viruses isolated monthly from 1999 to 2007 in Belém and São Paulo Belém São Paulo Influenza virus isolated plotted exactly in their time of collection Mello et al (2010)
Now we overlap the Southern andNorthernHemisphere recommendations
And count first the matches obtained with the Southern Hemisphere recommendation… 11 matches
And compare with the matches if the Northern Hemisphere timing of the vaccine and composition were applied 24 matches!
Part 1: How to extract the basic components of epidemiological relevance from a time-series?
Brazilian dataset of deaths coded as pneumonia and influenza We are going to extract as much information as possible from this series
Brazilian dataset of deaths coded as pneumonia and influenza • Example of analyses performed in Schuck-Paim et al 2012 Were equatorial regions less affected by the 2009 influenza pandemic? The Brazilian experience. PLoS One. • Data source: Department of Vital Statistics from the Brazilian Ministry of Health
Series to be analyzed Typical epidemiological time series from where to obtain as many meaningful and useful parameters as possible
Average Many times this information is all we need! mortality at time t
Average But, it still leaves much of the variation (“residuals”) of the series unexplained … the first of which seems to be an “unbalanced” between the extremities mortality at time t
Linear trend • Better now!
Trend (linear) We can use this information (e.g. is the disease increasing/decreasing? - but then the data needs to be incidence) Mortality at time t Mean Mortality Linear trends
Trend (with quadratic term too) • Better definition • It gets more complicated as a parameter to be compared across time-series • But better if our purpose is eliminate the temporal trend Mortality at time t Quadratic trends
Getting rid of the trend Blue line: “detrended series”
But let’s keep the graphic of the original series for illustrative purposes Clearly, there are still other interesting epidemiological patterns to describe… Mortality at time t Mean Mortality Linear and quadratic trends
We can see some rhythm… • The block of residuals alternates cyclically • Therefore this is something that can be quantified using few parameters Mortality at time t Mean Mortality Linear and quadratic trends
The Fourier theorem states that any waveform can be duplicated by the superposition of a series of sine and cosine waves As an example, the following Fourier expansion of sine waves provides an approximation of a square wave Source: http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/chem-ed/data/fourier.html
Fourier decomposition • the periodic variability of the monthly mortality time-series is partitioned into harmonic functions. • By summing the harmonics we obtain what can be considered as an average seasonal signature of the original series, where year-to-year variations are removed but seasonal variations within the year are preserved • This method is not always appropriate when dealing with complex population time series, since it cannot take into account the often-observed changes in the periodic behavior of such series (i.e., they are not “stationary”).
Before modeling cycles: …so, remembering, these are the residuals before Fourier Mortality at time t Mean Mortality Linear and quadratic trends
… and now with the incorporation of the annual harmonic Mortality at time t Annual harmonic Mean Mortality trends
or with the semi-annual harmonic only? Mortality at time t semiannual harmonic Mean Mortality trends
Much better when the annual + semi-annual harmonics are considered together! Mortality at time t Annual and semi-annual harmonics Mean Mortality trends
Although not much difference when the quarterly harmonic is added… Mortality at time t Periodic (seasonal) components Mean Mortality trends
average seasonal signature of the original series • We obtained therefore the average seasonal signature of the original series (where year-to-year variations are removed but seasonal variations within the year are preserved) • Now, let’s extract some interest parameters (remember, we always need a “number” to compare, for instance, across different sites)
Timing and Amplitude average seasonal signature of the original series
5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 Variations in relative peak amplitude of pneumonia and influenza coded deaths with latitude Alonso et al 2007 Seasonality of influenza in Brazil: a traveling wave from the Amazon to the subtropics. Am J Epidemiol Latitude (degrees) (p < 0.001) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Amplitude of the major peak (%)
5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 The seasonal component was found to be most intense in southern states, gradually attenuating towards central states (15oS) and remained low near the Equator Latitude (degrees) (p < 0.001) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Amplitude of the major peak (%)
5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 Variations in peak timing of influenza with latitude (p < 0.001) Latitude (degrees) J F M A M J J A S O N D Phase of the major peak (months of the year)
5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 Peak timing was found to be structured spatio-temporally: annual peaks were earlier in the north, and gradually later towards the south of Brazil (p < 0.001) Latitude (degrees) J F M A M J J A S O N D Phase of the major peak (months of the year)
5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 Such results suggest southward waves of influenza across Brazil, originating from equatorial and low population regions and moving towards temperate and highly populous regions in ~3 months. (p < 0.001) Latitude (degrees) J F M A M J J A S O N D Phase of the major peak (months of the year)
But can we still improve the model? Yes, and in some cases we should, Mostly to model excess estimates e.g. pandemic year Mortality at time t Periodic (seasonal) components Mean Mortality trends
Residuals after excluding “atypical” (i.e. pandemic) years from the model To define what is “normal” it is necessary to exclude the year that we suspect might be ‘abnormal’ from the model
Ok, so now we can count what was the impact of the pandemic here right?
No! (unless you consider all the other anomalies pandemics(andanti-pandemics…) That is why we need to include usual residual variance in the model, and calculate excess BEYOND usual variation