1 / 17

Mexico-California Migration

Mexico-California Migration. Alisa Garni & Arpi Miller Kansas State University/University of California, Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills). (AFP/Getty Images/File/John Moore). AP photo by Guillermo Arias: (top 2 photos available at http://www.daylife.com/source/AP_Photo).

casta
Download Presentation

Mexico-California Migration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mexico-California Migration Alisa Garni & Arpi Miller Kansas State University/University of California, Los Angeles (AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills) (AFP/Getty Images/File/John Moore) AP photo by Guillermo Arias: (top 2 photos available at http://www.daylife.com/source/AP_Photo) Photo available at: http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/US-Mexico-Border-Issues/

  2. Relevant Nodal Points/Policy and Plans • Variable nexus between different policy spheres and aspects of migration project • Policies: Federal, state, & local • Questions of implementation • Anticipation and enforcement! • Migration project (actual & anticipated): • Initial trip • Circular migration • Settlement

  3. Relevant nodal points/Migrant response • Response to different policies varied: • personal circumstances • migration goals • stage within the migration project • social context • Local social, economic, political environment and urban infrastructure affects actual nodal points

  4. Actual nodal points? • Three kinds of response to policy: • Ignoring policy  no change in behavior but exposure to risk • Initial migration, driving and working without permission • Slight modification in behavior • Driving new routes (police harassment) • Significant modification in behavior • Life changing decisions to move, delay migration (or return), change jobs, etc.

  5. Types of Policies Overall: Federal policy significant; however, in absence of favorable federal reform, state and local policies become more salient

  6. State-level enforcement of federal policy From left to right: California Govenor Arnold Schwarzenegger with Cabinet Secretary Dan Dunmoyer and U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff at the 26th Border Governors Conference (August 2008); Gov. Schwarzenegger delivers a presentation at same conference. Photos and news story from REUTERS. Available at: http://www.daylife.com/search/photos/all/3?q=U.S.+Mexico+border

  7. Local level policies: • State level denial of access to identity documents • State/municipal level “crack downs” on landlords, employers • Police harassment

  8. Policy Characteristics: Restrictive vs. Expansionary • Restrictive policies  greatest impact • Prompted both moderate and significant modifications in behavior • Expansionary policy? • Hiring practices • News about local rights in other states—draw • Anticipation of federal reform

  9. Information? • Sources: • Family, social networks • Spanish language media broadcasts/news • Churches and other social services • Content: • Federal policy/questions of reform • “Bad neighborhoods” • Police checkpoints • Employment information • Goods and services (e.g., housing, transportation) • Obtaining identification documents

  10. Networks • Social networks (broader than kinship) were most significant • Professional networks significant in initial trip, also assisted migrants in overcoming obstacles to living and working in U.S. • Exposure to risk, exploitation

  11. Typology of the Mexico-California Case Unauthorized migrants embedded in a historically well-developed migratory pattern

  12. Migrant Typologies • High-skilled • Family reunification • Asylum/refugee (gender cases) • Temporary visa carriers • Unauthorized

  13. Typology of Unauthorized Migrant • Leaders/followers • Pioneers in family; later migrants reuniting • Lone/Accompanied • Qualitative differences for lone vs. family based • Gender • Differences in networks, access to jobs, transport • More/less entrenched in U.S. society • Deeply invested, newly arrived

  14. Conclusions • After arrival, state/local level policies and practices increasingly affect migrant routines, options, decisions, and quality of life. • Mediating factors between policy and behavior • Local context (including infrastructure) • Degree of investment • Personal characteristics

  15. Conclusions (cont.) • Restrictive policies frequently fail to dissuade migrants in pursuing projects  forced to adapt, potentially suffer physical and mental strain, economic hardship and social isolation. • Need to better understand the geographical and political realities of a migrant destination, as well as the diverse and particular situations of the migrants within it

  16. Emergent research questions • What is the relationship between the local context in which a policy is encountered and the efficacy of that policy (manifest vs. latent function)? • What is the relationship between unauthorized migrants’ degree of investment in host context and the way in which a policy is experienced?

  17. Tentative Hypotheses • Inverse relationship between extensiveness of local infrastructure (formal and informal) and the degree to which migrants are affected by restrictive policies (though risk remains) • The more invested unauthorized migrants are in the host context, the more deeply they will be affected by restrictive policies, but the less likely they will be to modify their behavior

More Related