350 likes | 592 Views
Phase-Change Nonvolatile Memory: Current Status and Possible Advances using Nanowires. M. Meyyappan NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035 M.Meyyappan@nasa.gov. Acknowledgement: Bin Yu, Xuhui Sun. Requirements for an Ideal Memory. Combine the best of these:
E N D
Phase-Change Nonvolatile Memory: Current Status and Possible Advances using Nanowires M. Meyyappan NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035 M.Meyyappan@nasa.gov Acknowledgement: Bin Yu, Xuhui Sun
Requirements for an Ideal Memory • Combine the best of these: - High speed of the Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) - Nonvolatile nature of flash memory - Density of DRAM • Low Cost • Scalability Some Candidates • Magnetic RAM • Ferroelectric RAM • Ovonic Unified Memory (after Ovshinsky who proposed it in 1968) or Phase-change Random Access Memory (PRAM)
Phase Change Materials • Phase change materials date back to 1960s - Mainstream optical storage media (CD-RW, DVD-RW) • Common phase-change material candidates - GeTe, GeSbTe, In2Se3,InSb, SbTe, GaSb, InSbTe, GaSeTe, … - Thermally induced phase change (orderly single crystalline or polycrystalline C-phase vs. less orderly amorphous -phase)
Phase-Change Random Access Memory (PRAM) • Electrically operated phase-change Random Access Memory (PRAM) • - Proposed nearly 3 decades ago • - Binary or multiple resistive states of the programmable element to represent logic levels • • PRAM advantages • Simpler fabrication than FET-based NVMs • Improved endurance (resistor-based) • Faster read/write • Binary or multiple resistive states • Soft-error or radiation free operation
If that good, Why is it not on the market? • • PRAM Issues • - Large programming current to generate the thermal energy needed for inducing the phase change • - Joule heating induced power dissipation issues • - Intercell thermal interference • - Scaling difficulties due to the above • In the beginning, reluctance to introduce an unknown complex alloy into main stream silicon processing • At the same time, silicon flash memory started to advance rapidly • All of this together put the brakes somewhat, slowing down developments
Why Renewed Interest in PRAM Now? • Difficulties scaling Flash Memory, leading to extensive search for alternatives • Phase change material is no longer mysterious, much more known about these alloys in the last two decades • Steady developments in addressing key issues - programming current reduction - endurance - intercell interferance - new architectures • Major players involved - Intel, IBM, Samsung, Infineon, Philips…
PRAM Technology Advancement IBM Infineon Macronix PCRAM Joint Project (2006 VLSI Symp) • Pillar phase change memory, 180 nm CMOS • N-doped GST pillar on top of W contact • Current-confining pillar leads to self heating • Reset current 900 µA (at 75 nm diameter) • Endurance test 106 cycles
PRAM Technology Advancement ST Microelectronics, VLSI Tech. Digest (2006) • 90 nm PRAM, cell area 12 F2 • Vertical PNP BJT Selector device- base of BJT is the word line - emitter connected to the bottom of PRAM cell • Programming current ~ 400 µA • Endurance 108 reset/set cycles
PRAM Technology Advancement • Cross bar array of PRAM devices • Efforts to confine switching volume into nanometer scale • Fabrication at 60 nm scale with UV nanoimprint lithography Lee et al Microelec. Eng. Vol. 84, 573-576 (2007)
PRAM TechnologyInsight from 3-D Modeling • Current density and temperature at the GST/electrode interface are lower than in the center of the GST layer; due to larger heat dissipation on the TiN electrode. • In the center, 616°C is reached in 3 ns. • Temporal evolution of temperature and phase help to understand dynamics. Kim et al J. Appl. Phys. 101, 064512 (2007) (RWTH Aachen University)
PRAM Technology Advancement • Tip based memory, no separate selecting device • Sharp scanning tip reduces the volume between the head that does R/W and the PRAM layer • Slow scanning speed is to be compensated by parallel array of tips, just as in Millipede • Modeling shows bits that are 15-30 nm dia and tips ~ 20 nm dia are possible and can give 1 Tbit/inch2 Wright et al, IEEE Trans. Nanotech. Vol. 5, p 50 (2006)U. of Exeter
PRAM with Etched-down wires M. Lankhorst et al., Nat. Mater., Vol. 4, 2005, P347-352 (Philips) Y. Chen et al , IEDM, 2006 (IBM) • narrow line of GeSb • Reset 90 µA for 60 nm2 • Restraints to aggressive scaling • Critical material dimension depends on “top-down” process • Lithography resolution, etching-induced surface damage, line-edge roughness, difficulty to achieve high aspect ratio geometry, and more. • Fabrication cost increases dramatically as critical size scale down
Limits of Phase Change Properties • Does phase change property exist when you reach extremely small particle size? • Test cell: Aluminum top electrode 20 µm GST layer 100 nm p-doped silicon waferIn situ laser ablation to generate < 10 nm GST particles • Phase change properties exist down to 10 nm particle size • Projected reset current 1 µA
Why 1-D Phase-Change Nanowire? • Nanoscale Benefits • Smaller cell volume, leads to direct reduction of energy needs • Reduced melting point (30-50%) • Reduced thermal conductivity (1-2 orders of mag.) • Large aspect ratio (self-heating resistor) • Perfect surface morphology (not etched) • Growth Benefits • Highly scalable critical size – diameter depends on catalyst size (down to ~ a few nm) • Etching-free • One-step LPCVD or MOCVD
Projected Nanowire-based Memory Features • Ultra-low reset current (< 10µA/cell) • Possible very low-cost manufacturing • Pitch depends on innovative cell design • Break lithography limit with high-density template-guided large-scale self-assembly Vertical nanowire (NASA-Ames)
Carrier gas flow Nanowire Chemical Synthesis Vapor-Liquid-Solid (VLS) Mechanism Schematic diagram of thermal evaporation CVD
Family of Phase-Change Materials BinaryTernaryQuaternary Ge TeGe Sb Te Ag In Sb Te In Sb In Sb Te (Ge Sn)Sb Te In Se Ga Se Te Ge Sb (Se Te) Sb Te Sn Sb Te Te Ge Sb S Ga Sb In Sb Ge … … … Critical Parameters • Melting Point • Phase-change energy threshold • Reliability/stability • Multi-level storage • Electrical Resistance • Self-heating efficiency • Programming energy • Thermal Conductivity & Specific Heat • Self-heating efficiency • Programming energy (Red: nanowires synthesized at NASA-Ames)
Binary /Ternary Phase-Change Nanowires X. Sun, B. Yu, M. Meyyappan, abstract submitted to MRS Spring Meeting, 2008
GeTe Nanowires: TEM, SAED, and EDS Ge:Te≈1:1 <110> 40 nm (a) TEM image of an individual GeTe nanowire with a diameter of ~ 40 nm. The inset shows an SAED pattern of fcc cubic lattice structure. (b) EDS spectrum of the same GeTe nanowire. X. Sun et al., JPCC, 111, 2421 (2007)
In2Se3 Nanowires: TEM and EDS Spectra d ~ 40nm In:Se2:3 TEM image and corresponding EDS spectra of an individual In2Se3 nanowire. Scare bar is 100 nm. X. Sun et al., APL, 89, 233121 (2006)
Ge:Te≈1:1 Ge:Sb ≈ 7:93 ~ 9:91 40 nm 100 nm GeSb Nanowires: TEM, SAED and EDS Diameter range: 40-100nm
GeTe Nanowires: Melting Experiment and In-Situ Monitoring by TEM Liquid GeTe In-situ Tm measurement of GeTe nanowire under TEM image monitoring (a) The GeTe nanowire is under room temperature. (b) The GeTe nanowire is heated up to 400C when the nanowire melts and its mass is gradually lost through evaporation. The remaining oxide shell can be seen from the image. X. Sun et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 111 (2007)
PCM Nanowires: Melting Point Tm of bulk PCM Tm of PCM nanowires • The melting temperature of the phase-change nanowire is identified as the point at which (1) the electron diffraction pattern disappears and (2) the nanowire starts to evaporate. • This property is diameter-dependent: reduction even more significant for smaller diameters
Melting Point Reduction = ∆ = Deviation of melting point from the bulk value To = Bulk melting point = Surface tension coefficient for a liquid-solid interface = Material density r = Nanowire radius AR = Nanowire aspect ratio L = Latent heat of fusion
Electron-Beam Based GST NanowireThermal Programming After 5-sec e-beam localized thermal writingfrom crystal to amorphous Before After d ~ 55nm Thermally induced nano-encoding on an individual 1-D GST nanowire with scanning focused electron beam. A series of α-GST nanodots were created by highly localized thermal heating with an e-beam spot. The amorphous-to-crystalline boundary is marked by red dash line. X. Sun et al., APL, 90, 183116 (2007)
Pt PC-NW Mo Pad Pt PC-NW Pt Nanowire Phase-Change Memory Prototype Fabrication/Measurement RESET SET
In2Se3 Nanowire MemorySwitching Behavior In2Se3 nanowire phase change memory switching behavior as a function of reset/set pulse voltage Pulse width: (a) Reset at 20 nsec. (b) Set at 100 μsec. Could be further reduced via memory size scaling B. Yu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 133119 (2007)
In2Se3 Nanowire Memory I-V R-V • Device characteristics in either state with successive measurement sweeps show stable resistive behavior • Dynamic switching ratio (on/off resistance) is ~105
In2Se3 Nanowire MemoryRepeated Reset-set Cycles reset reset reset set set Reading Repeated resistance measurement of In2Se3 phase-change nanowire memory device. Device was switched between high- and low-resistive states using voltage pulses: LRS - HRS using 7V / 20 ns reset pulse; HRS - LRS using 5V / 100 S set pulse.
GeTe Nanowire Phase-Change Memory @2.5V @1.1V GeTe nanowire phase change memory switching behavior as a function of reset/set voltage Pulse width: (a) Reset at 20 nsec. (b) Set at 20 μsec.
Why In2Se3 is Attractive? • High resistance material, leading to inherently lower current • Highly amenable for multilevel operation • No need for doping and other strategies used with GST to increase resistance • No phase segregation problems as are likely with ternary alloys
Challenges ahead for Nanowire Approach • Controlled growth direction, diameter • Overall process flow development; such things have never been done before • Scalability modeling to demonstrate minimum pitch without interference • If successful, Advantages would be • Scalability at reduced cost (down to 5 nm) • Thin film PRAM pitch is way larger than litho limit. NW-PRAM can be pushed to state-of-the-art litho limit (if catalyst is patterned) or lower (if catalyst self-assembled) • Thin film PRAM footprint is large with large selecting device to deliver the needed current. NW-PRAM will also reduce the selecting device size and overall footprint.
Ultimate Phase-Change Memory ? Technology Goal Technology Challenges Develop low-power high-density data storage using nanomaterial array, enabling 102~103X faster R/W, 10~15X lower write voltage, and 10~100X higher integration density • Super-scalable R-switching nanowire memory • Large-scale self-assembly / patterned assembly • 3-D integration / selecting device Next-generation highly scalable, ultra-low power, resistive switching non-volatile memory chip technology based on phase-change nanomaterials Technical Approach Resistive Switching in PC Nanowire Anticipated Performance Metrics • 3-D vertical nanowire array • Non-charge-based (radiation-free) • Significantly reduced thermal writing energy (102~103X) • Super scalable memory cell • Reduced thermal interference • Multi-layer stacking for high integration density • Binary or analog data storage • Low temperature assembly compatible with Si-IC platform • Target 0.5~1 V R/W operation • 1 µA/cell reset current Programming (set) Erasing (reset) • 1 TB/cm2 density • <10-12 J/bit switch energy electrode Nanowire after programming Nanowire before programming • Less than 10 ns write time • 1010 cycle endurance High-resistance state Low-resistance state