1 / 21

Research evaluation: is it our business? Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation

Research evaluation: is it our business? Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation. Andria McGrath Senior Information Specialist, Research Support, King ’ s College London. What is research evaluation?.

cbeazley
Download Presentation

Research evaluation: is it our business? Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research evaluation: is it our business? Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation Andria McGrath Senior Information Specialist, Research Support, King’s College London

  2. What is research evaluation? • External evaluation – in the UK the RAE now REF3 major elements of the RAE: • publication outputs, • grant income awarded, • research students • Vital importance – link to income • Benchmarking – Rankings • Internal evaluation

  3. The players in institutions • Research Office • PVC Research • Research group/dept heads • Administrators • Librarians – publications expertise • Institutional repository managers

  4. Evolving interest • REF events at King’s 2008 -2010 • 1st event – Beyond the RAE – representatives from 75 universities – 1/3 librarians • Survey – • biggest challenges – verifying publication lists • Biggest concerns for REF – bibliometrics – data sources, subject differences, skilling up to cope • http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/support/ref

  5. Events Nov 08 and June 09 • Focus on bibliometrics – pilots • Pre-event survey before Nov event: • Only about half of institutions had a centralized publications data collection system • One or two mentioned Symplectic • One mentioned something called Pure

  6. Data collection systems • Some – only concerned with collecting RAE pubs • Others – aimed at collecting all publication info • Wider uses – profile pages / internal evaluation • Some creating internal ‘home grown’ systems • Separate systems for 3 RAE data elements • Integrated system, taking feeds from other systems (eg Research Gateway at King’s)

  7. REF focus changed • Bibliometrics element toned down • Impact (4th King’s REF event in June 2010) • Not publication impact – practical impacts of research • Research leaders had seen the light on • data collection systems • bibliometrics

  8. CRIS Current Research Information SystemsAlready common in mainland Europe

  9. CERIF • Common European Research Information Format • A standard – uses XML • Objects or entities with attributes eg project, person, organizational unit; • Relationships – 'linking relations’ • Rich semantics – roles and time

  10. R4R project - Ready for REF • JISC project – King’s and Southampton • CERIF4REF XML schema created • Plugins for Eprints, Dspace and Fedora • Transfer data to REF collection system • Research admins, IR managers, systems staff and librarians involved • http://r4r.cerch.kcl.ac.uk/

  11. Librarians and CRIS systems • St Andrews experience • If research office led – get in on the ground floor • Librarians have plenty of expertise to offer

  12. Which librarians? • Senior managers • Subject/liaison librarians • Research support librarians • Instutional repository managers • Information resources depts. – subs • Enquiries staff

  13. Strategic directions for libraries • RLUK strategic themes • 1st – redefining the research library model • New services / new roles for staff • Value of libraries for research and researchers (RIN/RLUK report) • RLUK – Reskilling for Research (forthcoming) • Research support librarians

  14. Some new areas for librariansassociated with research evaluation • CRIS systems & CERIF • New ways of interacting with bibliographic / citation databases • APIs – for publication or citation data • Discovering other institutional systems eg grants DBs / student systems that feed into CRISs • Bibliometrics principles and new products

  15. New opportunities • Showing our value • To administrators / research office • To academics and senior research leaders • To Graduate School • Opportunities to advocate Open access

  16. Bibliometrics – the new buzz word Awareness growing • By librarians • By research leaders in institutions • By academics

  17. Librarians – natural synergy • Citation databases • Citation reports • Training offered – eg by Thomson Reuters • Training points up limitations of basic measures • Normalizing of measures crucial but difficult without specialised products

  18. By research leaders • A few initiates who understand the issues leading the way • Percentiles tables in Essential Science Indicators used for evaluations • H-index being used by some • At least one institution has employed a bibliometrician

  19. Academics Some beginning to take an interest • Discovering: • ResearcherID • Citation reports in citation databases • Google Scholar • Graduates – training opportunity – “Making an impact”

  20. Holy grail • Research information system • Dashboard for research managers – eg for grant information • Captures data with minimum effort • Integrated with bibliometrics • For internal & external purposes – evaluation and promotional

  21. Is it our business?

More Related