170 likes | 190 Views
Investment Treaty Forum Twelfth ITF Public Conference Investment Treaties at 50: Host State Perspective 15 May 2009 Developing country challenges in negotiating, implementing and complying with BITs: trends and outlook Anna Joubin-Bret Senior Legal Advisor UNCTAD. TRENDS.
E N D
Investment Treaty Forum Twelfth ITF Public Conference Investment Treaties at 50: Host State Perspective 15 May 2009 Developing country challenges in negotiating, implementing and complying with BITs: trends and outlook Anna Joubin-Bret Senior Legal Advisor UNCTAD
TRENDS Among the most important recent trends is the increasing number and complexity of IIAs → risk that countries face overlapping and sometimes inconsistent obligations → possibly detrimental to their policy objectives → increased risk of investor-State disputes Several factors: substantive, systemic, subject-specific
The network of BITs continues to grow rapidly, there are now over 2500 BITs
South-South BITs 47 South-South BITs in 1990 Over 700 in 2008
Renegotiations • rise in renegotiation of BITs among countries • In 2008 eight additional BITs were renegotiated among member countries • This brings the total number of renegotiated BITs to 132 by the end of 2008 • During the year, Czech Republic alone renegotiated five BITs while Vietnam renegotiated two BITs • China and Germany lead the renegotiation process by 16 BITs each while Morocco and Egypt follow with eleven and nine BITs respectively.
Free Trade Agreements with Investment Chapters • International investment rules are increasingly being formulated as part of agreements that encompass a broader range of issues (including trade, services, competition, intellectual property) • Regional integration with investment disciplines: ASEAN investment liberalization and protection • The total number of such economic agreements with investment provisions exceeded 254, as of June 2008
Recent FTAs with investment chapters • Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and Canada • Free Trade Agreement between China and New Zealand • Free Trade Agreement between Singapore and Panama • Economic Partnership Agreement between Japan and Thailand • Free Trade Agreement between the United States and the Republic of Korea • EC-CARIFORUM Economic Partnership Agreement
IMPLICATIONS → Countries and companies operate within an increasingly intricate framework of multi-layered and multi-faceted investment rules, which may contain overlapping and perhaps even inconsistent obligations. → This may render economic policies of host countries more complicated.
Several Factors • Divergent model agreements • Protection-oriented BITs and liberalization-oriented FTAs • Compatibility/implementation at the national level with national laws
Interactions Within an IIA • Cumulating interactions: services/investment chapters in FTAs, ISDS/general DS in the FTA • Contradiction interactions: policy-space issues • Explication interactions: definitions or exceptions with substantive provisions
Interactions With Other IIAs • Reinforcement interactions: services-related provisions reinforcing GATs • The MFN provisions • Cumulating interactions: dispute settlement provisions (FTAs/WTO) • Contradiction interactions: interactions with State Contracts
CONSISTENCY:DOMESTIC CONCERNS • The negotiation of IIAs includes interrelated and complicated policy issues that, at least in principle, touch upon a whole range of domestic concerns. (Ex.: social and environmental matters) • Balancing private and public interests: • Protect host country interests: clarification, stronger emphasis on public policy concerns, strengthen public role in ISDS. Transparency. • create a certain balance between rights and responsibilities of investors. • Preserving regulatory flexibility to pursue national policies.
Challenges for developing countries • Developing countries and economies in transition often lack the necessary human resources to negotiate agreements that appropriately reflect their interests and needs • Risk of overlapping and sometimes conflicting commitments in IIAs • Implementing IIA obligations • Developing dispute prevention policies • Dispute management techniques • Strengthening the development dimension of IIAs