350 likes | 565 Views
Incorporating SLOs and Assessment into Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation in a Time of Budget Reduction. Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Buran Haidar, San Diego Miramar College, Facilitator Erik Shearer, Napa Valley College Chris Hill, Grossmont College
E N D
Incorporating SLOs and Assessment into Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation in a Time of Budget Reduction Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Buran Haidar, San Diego Miramar College, Facilitator Erik Shearer, Napa Valley College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Jenny Simon, El Camino College
Overview Presentation of assessment, resource allocation, and planning integration processes from three colleges: • Jenny Simon, El Camino College • Chris Hill, Grossmont College • Erik Shearer, Napa College Activity and discussion integrated throughout presentations.
Program Review Refer to: ECC Planning Document—pg. 1
SLO Assessment & Program Review • Recommendations resulting from SLO assessment are reported in program review
Follow the SLO... Refer to: ECC Planning Document—pgs. 8 and 12-13
If you have further questions or would like more information please contact: Jenny Simon Professor of ESL El Camino College (310) 660-3593 Ext: 5187 jsimon@elcamino.edu
Grossmont CollegeIntegrated Planning and Assessment Institutional Excellence is as simple as…
Long-Term Planning • 6-Year Unit Plan • asked to complete 6-year SLO assessment plan • 6-Year Program Review • What is working well in your current SLO assessment process, and how do you know? What needs improvement and why? • Using your course-level SLO Assessment Analyses discuss your students' success at meeting your Program SLOs. • Based on your discussion, are there any program SLOs that are not adequately being assessed by your course-level SLOs? • Please discuss any planned modifications (i.e. curricular or other) to the program itself as a result of these various assessment analyses.
Long-Term Planning 6-Year Unit Plan 6-Year Program Review Short-Term Planning • Annual Unit Action Plan • If the Activity is Course-level SLO Assessment, please list the Course # and SLO #. If it is SSO/ASO/ISO Assessment, list the Student Service/Administrative/Instructional area. • If the Activity is Course-level SLO Assessment [or SSO/ASO/ISO Assessment], please briefly describe the assessment method that will be used (i.e. for HIST 108, SLOs #1, 2 and 3, all HIST 108 instructors will use a shared written assignment graded with a shared rubric). • Annual Program Review Update • Assessment Assignments and/or Instruments: Which were used to assess the SLO? (checkboxes) • Assessment Analysis (Please write a narrative on the following: What did you learn from the assessment of the outcomes? (i.e. In which areas did students excel? What issues and needs were revealed?) Did the assessment work, and if not, what needs to be revised? • Course SLO Action Plan (please indicate how you will use these course assessment results and analysis for course improvement) (checkboxes) • Program Action Plan (please indicate how you will use these SLO assessment results and analysis for continuous program improvement) (checkboxes)
College determines next cycle's goals College prepares annual implementation plan Finalize annual implementation plan and report out next cycle's goals Units prepare annual action plans
Recommend funding of prioritized activities & explore other sources of funding Units select and forward top activity proposals IRC scores activity proposals
Continuous Improvement Unit and College-wide Assessment: • Annual program review updates • Annual Student Learning & Service Outcome Assessment • Annual Activity Presentations to Planning and Resources Council (P&RC) • Annual Review of Assessment Data and Dashboard Report within Institutional Excellence Committee and at Leadership Retreat • Implemented a faculty research liaison position Feedback on Integrated Planning Process: • Institutional Review Committee annual review • P&RC annual review • Chairs and Coordinators Council • Periodic Surveys • User feedback as it occurs • Various other constituent groups
Communication and the culture of change Planning Website Different Document Versions Professional Development Training Written communiqués Roving Pop Quizzes (with fabulous prize packages) Constituent Group Meetings Convocation Annual Leadership Retreat "PIE" wallet card
Annual Reporting Institutional Excellence is as Easy as… lanning Goals for 2012-13 mplementation Strategies for 2011-12 valuation of the Effectiveness of 2010-11 Strategies I P E
If you have further questions or would like more information please contact: Chris Hill, Ph.D. Professor of Earth Sciences Grossmont College (619) 644-7342 chris.hill@gcccd.edu
Planning and Budgeting conducted through two complementary processes: • Program Evaluation and Planning conducted by Individual Programs once every 6 yrs. • Yearly Unit Plan and Budget conducted every year by Budget Centers composed of multiple programs.
Yearly Unit Planning and Budgeting: • Unit Plan: Combined planning and budgeting for multiple programs. • Based on PEP and Aligned with Strategic Plan • Composed of three primary components
Link for Additional Information http://www.napavalley.edu/AboutNVC/Accreditation/Pages/welcome.aspx Open the PDF file of our 2009 Accreditation Self-study. Program Evaluation and Planning (PEP) process is described in the NVC Self-study PDF in §II.B. The Budget Process is described in §III.D.
If you have further questions or would like more information please contact: Erik Shearer Professor of Art Chair, Division of Arts and Humanities Napa Valley College (707) 259 8978 eshearer@napavalley.edu