1 / 1

INTRODUCTION The results from a third structure determination

The third Structure Determination by Powder Diffractometry Round Robin (SDPDRR-3) L.M.D. Cranswick and A. Le Bail Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, National Research Council Canada, Building 459, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River ON, Canada, K0J 1J0. Email : lachlan.cranswick@nrc.gc.ca

cecil
Download Presentation

INTRODUCTION The results from a third structure determination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The third Structure Determination by Powder Diffractometry Round Robin (SDPDRR-3) L.M.D. Cranswick and A. Le Bail Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, National Research Council Canada, Building 459, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River ON, Canada, K0J 1J0. Email : lachlan.cranswick@nrc.gc.ca Université du Maine, Laboratoire des Oxydes et Fluorures, CNRS UMR 6010, Av. O. Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans, France. Email : Armel.Le_Bail@univ-lemans.fr INTRODUCTION The results from a third structure determination by powder diffractometry (SDPD) round-robin are summarized. From the 175 potential participants having downloaded the powder data, 9 have sent a total of 12 solutions (8 and 4 respectively for samples 1 and 2, a calcium tartrate tetrahydrated and a lanthanum tungstate). They used 7 different computer programs for structure solution (ESPOIR, EXPO, FOX, PSSP, SHELXS, SUPERFLIP, TOPAS),applying either the Patterson or direct methods, direct space methods, or the charge flipping approach. Sample 1 : CaC4H4O6.4H2O Conventional X-rays Sample 2 : La18W10O57 Synchrotron Neutron CONCLUSION Solving a structure from powder data remains a hard job, an order of magnitude harder than solving a problem with similar complexity from single crystal data. Nevertheless, a few more steps in the direction of routine were accomplished since the two previous round-robins : that time, not only the computer program developers were successful, but also some more standard users. No result was obtained from crystal structure prediction experts. • REFERENCES • Adil, K., Le Bail, A., Dujardin, G. & Maisonneuve V. (2007). Polyhedron 26, 2493- 2497. • Chambrier M.H., Le Bail A. & Goutenoire F. (2008). http://www.crystallography.net/ • Clegg, W. & Teat, S.J. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1343-1345. • Le Bail A. (2003). COD1000005 - http://www.crystallography.net/ • Le Bail, A. & Cranswick, L.M.D. (2001). Commission on Powder Diffraction IUCr Newsletter 25, 7-9. • Le Bail, A. & Cranswick, L.M.D. (2003). Commission on Powder Diffraction IUCr Newsletter 29, 31-34. • Le Bail, A., Bazin, D., Daudon, M. & Maisonneuve, V. (2008). http://www.crystallography.net/ • Zhu, J.H., Wu, H.X. & Le Bail, A. (1999). Solid State Science, 1, 55-62.

More Related