1 / 21

Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath r.heery@ukoln.ac.uk ukoln.ac.uk

Application Profiles: managing metadata schemas. Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath r.heery@ukoln.ac.uk http://www.ukoln.ac.uk. What implementors are doing …. Formulating schema identifying existing schemas where useful

cecil
Download Presentation

Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath r.heery@ukoln.ac.uk ukoln.ac.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application Profiles: managing metadata schemas Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath r.heery@ukoln.ac.uk http://www.ukoln.ac.uk DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  2. What implementors are doing …. • Formulating schema • identifying existing schemas where useful • Adding variety of ‘local extensions’ to standard schemas for specific requirements • adding local elements • refining definitions • Establishing local good practice • formulating rules for content DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  3. Examples of emerging schemas • DC-education http://purl.org/dc/document/wd/education-20000430.htm • describing educational resources • Jon Mason (EdNA) and Stuart Sutton (GEM) • users, duration, learning processes, standards, quality • RSLP collection description http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/schema/ • describing newly digitised special collections catalogues • Andy Powell (UKOLN) • collection policy, responsibility, location DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  4. DC-Education proposed schema • Various DC elements and recommended qualifiers • DC-education extensions • audience mediator • standard identifier, version • IEEE LOM IMS elements • TypicalLearningTime, InteractivityType, InteractivityLevel DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  5. RSLP Collection Description schema • dc:title The name of the collection • dc: identifier A formal identifier for the collection • dc:description A description of the collection • cld:strength An indication (free text or formalised) of the strength(s) of the collection • cld:accessControl A statement of any access restrictions placed on the collection including allowed users, charges etc • ……. • …... DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  6. Implementors’ requirements • How can implementors be helped to find out about local usage • Discovering information about schemas in use. • How can implementors combine element sets from different namespaces • Establishing context for Dublin Core. Answers will inform DC collaboration with other metadata initiatives DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  7. Inter-working systems Disclosure of semantics Alignment of metadata Disclosure What schemas exist? Is this schema current? How is it used? Economies of scale Re-use of effort - Good metadata management requirements DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  8. Application profiles DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  9. Types of metadata schema • Namespace schemas • International standards • Locally defined schemas, domain specific schemas • Application profiles • Combinations, subsets, variants of namespace schema DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  10. What is an application profile? Schema consisting of data elements drawn from one or more namespaces optimised for a particular local application • Draws on existing namespaces • Introduces no new data elements • Can specify permitted schemes and values • Can refine definitions DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  11. DC-Education proposed schema • Various DC elements and recommended qualifiers • DC-education extensions • audience mediator • standard identifier, version • IEEE LOM IMS elements • TypicalLearningTime, InteractivityType, InteractivityLevel DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  12. RSLP Collection Description schema • dc:title The name of the collection • dc: identifier A formal identifier for the collection • dc:description A description of the collection • cld:strength An indication (free text or formalised) of the strength(s) of the collection • cld:accessControl A statement of any access restrictions placed on the collection including allowed users, charges etc • ……. • …... DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  13. Within metadata instance? HTML XML/RDF XML Within schema definition? XML Schemas RDF Schemas Characteristics to be expressed? Rules for content Alternative definitions Subsets Mixing elements from different sets …and avoid complexity Syntax issues: how to capture expression of application profile? DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  14. Issues • Conformance • what is a valid IEEE LOM record? • Avoiding overlap and ambiguity • What is the distinction between schemas, namespace and vocabularies DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  15. Influence of syntax RDF can be very expressive in its assertions within an instance of metadata.. • Ensure expressions of application profiles can be made independent of RDF • How much expression must go into the schema language, how much into the metadata record? DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  16. Deal with classes • Metadata can be complex • Can describe different classes • Collection Descriptions deal with people, items, locations • Does this mean separate schemas per class? Or more richly structured schema? • Same solution for schemas and application profiles! DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  17. Where do we go from here? DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  18. Publishing application profiles • Why? • To inform and promote • To provide authoritative version • To facilitate inter-working • To align with other schemas • How? • Facilitate schema registration • Metadata registries DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  19. Metadata registry activity • DC Registry working group • Schemas Workshop, Bonn, November 23-24 http://www.schemas-forum.org/ DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  20. Change of emphasis …..not new functionality DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

  21. References DESIRE registry http://desire.ukoln.ac.uk/registry/ Dublin Core Registry discussion list http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/dc-registry/ IEEE Learning Object Metadata Scheme http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/scheme.html BIBLINKCore http://hosted.ukoln.ac.uk/biblink/wp8/fs/bc-semantics.html RDF Schema Specificaion http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ SCHEMAS http://www.schemas-forum.org/ Namespaces in XML http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000

More Related