100 likes | 318 Views
Manchester. Transient Population.High Psychiatric Morbidity.High levels of socio-economic deprivation.High levels of complex needs.One of highest numbers of MDO' s outside London.Pop: City 500K, Urban Area 3m, Region 7m.. PILOT 2007. Commissioned by NHS Manchester and Manchester DAST.A fact fi
E N D
1. DEVELOPING INTEGRATED SERVICES IN MANCHESTERMATT PATERSONConsultant Nurse
2. Manchester Transient Population.
High Psychiatric Morbidity.
High levels of socio-economic deprivation.
High levels of complex needs.
One of highest numbers of MDO’ s outside London.
Pop: City 500K, Urban Area 3m, Region 7m.
3. PILOT 2007 Commissioned by NHS Manchester and Manchester DAST.
A fact finding mission to identify need.
Multi-disciplinary team.
Multi speciality team.
Demonstrated marked improvements in clinical domains.
4. MO:DEL 2009
Single integrated CJLT.
Neighbourhood Policing.
Court Diversion/Mental Health Court.
Prison Liaison
Diversion Panels
Custody
Probation
Support for other providers
5. MO:DEL
Male and female
Aged over 16
In contact with CJS or likely to due to behaviour
Not effectively engaged with current providers
Evidence of mental health need
Resident of the City of Manchester.
6. Interventions Liaison
Information Sharing
Assessment
Active Case management for 6 months
Aim to engage with the service users and facilitate on referral to appropriate services
7. Activity 2009/10 802 referrals across CJS.
Main referrers CJS.
169 liaison only cases.
A number on a Trajectory to MSU.
Most cases historical contact with MH and SM services.
8. Key Elements Stakeholder relationships.
Partnership.
Flexibility.
Eclectic interventions.
Rapid response to referrals.
Shared information systems.
Demonstrate efficiencies.
9. Key Challenges. Interface between care and justice.
Exclusion by criteria
Accommodation.
Balancing ‘recovery’ and public protection.
10. Key Findings This client group is complex if not severe
This complexity is not catered for effectively by existing services.
This client group presents with overwhelming indicators of actuarial, clinical and contextual risk.
These service users respond to assertive treatment and engagement.
There is a gap in provision for a service to take care co-ordination responsibility for this client group.
Engaging with this client group is not problematic if there is the will to do so.