1 / 38

E uropean G rid I nitiative Towards a Sustainable Production Grid Infrastructure

E uropean G rid I nitiative Towards a Sustainable Production Grid Infrastructure. NGI Status Report Diana Cresti, INFN EGI Workshop Munich, 26-27 February 2007. Introduction. Countries reported on the state of their NGI & views of an EGI NGI questionnaire conducted during summer 2006

chadwick-roberson
Download Presentation

E uropean G rid I nitiative Towards a Sustainable Production Grid Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. European Grid InitiativeTowards a Sustainable Production Grid Infrastructure NGI Status Report Diana Cresti, INFN EGI Workshop Munich, 26-27 February 2007

  2. Introduction • Countries reported on the state of their NGI & views of an EGI • NGI questionnaire conducted during summer 2006 • These are preliminary findings, and cannot replace interactive exchange of information • 30 countries replied; near unanimity on forming an EGI • Full report is being published now:https://edms.cern.ch/document/804043/1/EGEE-II-NA5-DNA5.1-804043-v3.doc EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  3. The status of the NGI in each European country EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  4. PartA Current coverage EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  5. PartA Is there an NGI in your Country? Yes: 25 No: 5 EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  6. PartB Is there a National Grid Projectin your Country? Yes: 21 No: 9 EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  7. PartA Aus Cro CzR Fr DE Gr Lit NL Nor Pt Swe UK Bel Est Fin DE Gr Isr Pol Rus Ukr Bul Gr Ser Tk Ukr Est Fr Nor Ukr What Form does your NGI have? EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  8. PartA NGI recognised by a Gov ministry? Yes: 20 No, but plan toget recognition: 3  No; no plan toget recognition: 2 EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  9. PartA Is NGI Separate Legal Entity? • Bulgaria Yes; Italy under negotiation; • Germany – not a legal entity but a Project • Others are not separate legal entities, but are part of:  See handout Table 2  EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  10. PartB National Grid Project – Target Areas EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  11. Caution: please check data ahead… • Online tool was not interactive, but this workshop is • Some ambiguity in questions opportunity here to clarify • NGI status evolving rapidly most data from July 2006, and not updated since then • These data are invaluable, well worth “getting it right” EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  12. PartC NGI Financial Status Have you guaranteed sustainable funding for the NGI? Any additional sources of funding for the NGI? EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  13. PartC NGI Financial Status If sustainable funding has not been guaranteed, why:  See handout Table 3  • How many people does the NGI employ (or is expected to employ)? • 19 responses, ranging from 0 to 200+ • Mean 32, Median 10 • Some examples: • Czech Republic: ~15 (but part time) • Germany: about 200, and 200 more in 2007 • Greece: Around 80 all over the country (expected 100) • Ireland: 4.5 FTE in Operations Centre • Serbia: 0 - it is not expected to employ personnel EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  14. PartC NGI Financial Status • What is the total amount of local financing up to now (in M€)? • 19 responses, ranging from 0.1 to 20+ • Mean 3.96, Median 1.00 • Some examples: • Bulgaria (NGI since Sep ‘02): < 1 Million • Netherlands (NGI in steps, since ‘02): 1 going to >30 • Portugal (NGI since Apr ‘06): 3.5 M€, till now, plus 5M€ for the next 3 years • What is the annual budget (in M€ / year)? • 9 responses, ranging from 0.3 to 16+ • Mean 4.56, Median 1.50 • Some examples: • Finland: over 16 M€ turnover (excluding investments) • Sweden: 1 EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  15. PartB Users and Resources:Number of Users with valid Grid Certificate  1 - 20  21 - 50 51 - 100 101 - 250 251 - 500 (501 – 1000) > 1000  N / A EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  16. PartB Users and Resources:Number of Sites (resource centres)  1 - 5  6 - 10 10 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50  N / A EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  17. PartB Users and Resources:Number of Available CPUs  1 - 100  101 - 200 201 - 500 501 - 1000 1001 - 3000 > 3000  N / A EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  18. PartB Users and Resources:Available Storage Space (TBs)  0.1 - 10  10.1 - 20 20.1 - 50 50.1 - 100 100.1 - 1000 > 1000  N / A EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  19. PartC NGI Operational Information: Application Areas EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  20. What NGIs would like to see in an EGI EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  21. Proposed Functions of EGI Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  22. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of infrastructure operations Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  23. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of infrastructure operations Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  24. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Testing, cert and validation service including middleware Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  25. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Testing, cert and validation service including middleware Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  26. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Managed resource ctrs initial resources new user communities Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  27. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Managed resource ctrs initial resources new user communities Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  28. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of user and application support Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  29. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of user and application support Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  30. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of dissemination and training efforts Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  31. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Coordination of dissemination and training efforts Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  32. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Rep European Grid efforts on standards bodies Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  33. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Rep European Grid efforts on standards bodies Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  34. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Rep European Grid efforts with similar bodies from other continents Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  35. PartA Proposed Functions of EGI Rep European Grid efforts with similar bodies from other continents Very Important Quite Important No Opinion Not Important Unhelpful EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  36. PartA Other Functions / Stakeholders Other proposed functions of EGI - some brief quotes: •Cross country efforts / collaboration between NGIs; •Service for major new infrastructures (ESFRI); •Relationship with e.g. GEANT/DANTE; •Provision of guidelines / specification of cleaner & more atomic interfaces •Political support for NGIs / unified interface to EU bodies; •Establish a “business” scheme (tokens to use facilities);  See handout Table 4  Other stakeholders besides proposed set (NGIs, user communities, EC) - some brief quotes: •The research community; •e-IRG; possibly CERN; •National funding agencies / Ministries  See handout Table 5  EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  37. Conclusions & Next Steps • Commonality of vision with respect to EGI • Move beyond questionnaire format  Interactive knowledge base • NGI definition vs. actual status • Sustainability: a work in progress • 22 application areas (at least) • NGIs are coming together as we speak the time is right for EGI EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

  38. Thank you! Please contact me for corrections and follow up: Diana Cresti diana.cresti@pd.infn.it Tel: +39.049.8277348 Fax: +39.049.8277208 EGI Workshop - NGI Status Report

More Related