E N D
1. ROUGH-CUTCAPACITY PLANNING Validating The MPS (Sort Of)
Bills Of Materials & Routings
Capacity Planning Using Overall Factors
Capacity Bills
Picking A RCCP Technique
2. CORE MRP II
3. VALIDATING THE MPS (SORT OF) Need to ensure that MPS is feasible
MPS must not require more capacity then is available
Use rough-cut capacity planning techniques to estimate capacity needs in each workcenter
Labor requirements
Machine requirements
Compare capacity needed to planned available capacity
Adjust MPS if workcenters are overloaded
4. VALIDATING THE MPS (SORT OF) RCCP eliminates MPS's which drastically overload some workcenters
Low computational expense
Rapid calculation for “what-if” analysis
Not 100% accurate
Does not use material plans
All RCCP ignores actual lot-sizing, beginning inventory, work-in-process
5. VALIDATING THE MPS (SORT OF) Information requirements for all RCCP techniques
Bills of Materials (BOM’s)
Show how products are put together
Routings
Show where products and component parts are made
6. BILLS OF MATERIALS BOM's show how parts combine to create a product
Representation may be graphical
7. BILLS OF MATERIALS Indented BOM’s are common as computer printouts
X
A
B
A
Y
B(2)
A
8. ROUTINGS A routing lists the
Operations necessary to make a part
Workcenters where the operations are performed
The routing also lists the expected capacity needed at each operation
Per setup
Per unit
9. STANDARD TIMES A standard time per unit includes the runtime and an allocated portion of the setup time
Standard times assume an “average” lot size
Used in RCCP since actual lot sizes for parts ignored
10. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS Simplest and least accurate RCCP method
For N products, W workcenters, and a planning horizon of T periods, requires only N +W + 1 rows and T columns in a spreadsheet
Ignores current product mix, lead times
Therefore appropriate if lead time is short and product mix is steady over time
11. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS Determine cumulative standard times for each product
Apply cumulative standard times from (1) to MPS to determine total required capacity per period for facility
Determine planning factors expressing % of facilty capacity historically used in each workcenter
Apply planning factors from (3) to facility capacity from (2) to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
12. CUMULATIVE STANDARD TIMES The Cumulative Standard Time is the time required to make a unit of a part “from scratch”
STi,j – Incremental standard time to make part i in workcenter j
CSTi,j – Cumulative standard time to make part i and all component parts in workcenter j
CSTi – Cumulative standard time to make part i and all component parts in all workcenters
13. CUMULATIVE STANDARD TIMES
14. CUMULATIVE STANDARD TIMES
15. CUMULATIVE STANDARD TIMES
16. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS Determine cumulative standard times for each product: CSTX = 2.05 ; CSTY = 4.60
17. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS 2. Apply cumulative standard times from (1) to MPS to determine total required capacity per period for facility [CSTX = 2.05 ; CSTY = 4.60]
18. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS 2. Apply cumulative standard times from (1) to MPS to determine total required capacity per period for facility [CSTX = 2.05 ; CSTY = 4.60]
19. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS Determine planning factors expressing % of facilty capacity historically used in each workcenter
Workcenter W101: 70%
Workcenter W102: 30%
20. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS 4. Apply planning factors from (3) to facility capacity from (2) to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
Workcenter W101: 70%
Workcenter W102: 30%
21. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS 4. Apply planning factors from (3) to facility capacity from (2) to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
Workcenter W101: 70%
Workcenter W102: 30%
22. CAPACITY PLANNING USING OVERALL FACTORS 4. Apply planning factors from (3) to facility capacity from (2) to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
Workcenter W101: 70%
Workcenter W102: 30%
23. CAPACITY BILLS Slightly more computationally complex and more accurate than CPOF
For N products, W workcenters, and a planning horizon of T periods, requires N(W + 1) + 1 rows and T columns in a spreadsheet
Ignores lead times
Therefore appropriate if lead time is short
24. CAPACITY BILLS Determine cumulative standard times per workcenter for each product
Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
25. CUMULATIVE STANDARD TIMES
26. CAPACITY BILLS Determine cumulative standard times per workcenter for each product
CSTX,W101 = 1.25
CSTX,W102 = 0.80
CSTY,W101 = 3.00
CSTY,W102 = 1.60
27. CAPACITY BILLS 2. Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
[CSTX,W101 = 1.25; CSTX,W102 = 0.80; CSTY,W101 = 3.00; CSTY,W102 = 1.60]
28. CAPACITY BILLS 2. Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
[CSTX,W101 = 1.25; CSTX,W102 = 0.80; CSTY,W101 = 3.00; CSTY,W102 = 1.60]
29. CAPACITY BILLS 2. Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
[CSTX,W101 = 1.25; CSTX,W102 = 0.80; CSTY,W101 = 3.00; CSTY,W102 = 1.60]
30. CAPACITY BILLS 2. Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
[CSTX,W101 = 1.25; CSTX,W102 = 0.80; CSTY,W101 = 3.00; CSTY,W102 = 1.60]
31. CAPACITY BILLS 2. Apply cumulative standard times per workcenter from (1) to MPS to determine capacity requirements per period for each workcenter
[CSTX,W101 = 1.25; CSTX,W102 = 0.80; CSTY,W101 = 3.00; CSTY,W102 = 1.60]
32. PICKING A RCCP TECHNIQUE Stable demand and product mix?
Use CPOF
Changing mix but short lead times?
Use capacity bills
Changing mix and long lead times?
Use resource profiles