Secondary Applications of RTI: A Guided Discussion Donald D. Deshler University of Kansas Joseph F. Kovaleski Indiana

1. Secondary Applications of RTI: A Guided DiscussionDonald D. DeshlerUniversity of KansasJoseph F. KovaleskiIndiana University of Pennsylvania

2. Goals of Today�s Session Identify key features and critical issues related to implementing RTI at the secondary level. Engage participants in sharing information and ideas about secondary applications of RTI. Keep track of ideas and share with participants.

3. NCLB AND IDEA 2004 Scientifically based instruction, curriculum, and interventions Identification of learning problems early Ongoing monitoring to determine impact of curriculum and instruction Design and implement remedial and individualized intervention for those who don�t respond Inclusion of students in single accountability system Documentation of student outcomes through AYP

4. It�s not just about identification� IDEIA and NCLB are companion laws. They are mutually referential. Together, they envision a seamless system of supports, based on the use of scientifically based instruction, in both general and regular education. The mission is the development of proficiency in basic skills (particularly reading) for all students.

5. What Is Response to Intervention? A comprehensive, multi-tiered intervention strategy to enable early identification and intervention for students at academic or behavioral risk. An alternative to the discrepancy model for the identification of students with learning disabilities.

6. 6 RTI is �the practice of� (1) providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs and, (2) using learning rate over time and level of performance to (3) make important educational decisions. (p.5)�

7. Key Characteristics of RtI High quality instruction in general education Evidence-based instruction aligned to standards Universal Screening of academics and behavior Multiple tiers of increasingly intense interventions Use of evidence-based interventions Varied duration, frequency, and time of interventions Continuous monitoring of student performance Systematic assessment of intervention fidelity

9. Tier 1: Benchmark Phase Evidence-based core curriculum aligned with standards Periodic benchmark assessments Teachers analyzing students� performance data

10. What is the core curriculum at the secondary level? Basic skills? Content subjects? Study/organizational skills?

11. Struggling readers in middle and high school� are usually less fluent readers often have multi-syllabic needs have much smaller sight word vocabularies are less familiar with word meanings have less conceptual and content knowledge have fewer and less-developed comprehension strategies typically don�t enjoy reading

12. Major Areas of Reading Emphasis in Middle and High Schools Expand sight vocabulary to unfamiliar words Extend vocabulary development Increase knowledge of text structures and genres Acquire expanded content knowledge Increase thinking and reasoning skills Build positive connection with reading

13. Universal Instructional Design Principles Direct instruction Teacher modeling Scaffolded instruction Metacognitive instruction Engagement approaches

17. 

18. Intense-Explicit Instruction (RTI) LEVEL 1 Cue Do Review LEVEL 2 �I do it!� (Learn by watching) �We do it!� (Learn by sharing) �Ya�ll do it!� (Learn by sharing) �You do it! (Learn by practicing) LEVEL 3/4/5 Pretest Describe Commitment (student & teacher) Goals High expectations Model Practice and quality feedback Controlled and advanced Posttest & reflect Generalize, transfer, apply

19. The CLC says� There are unique (but very important) roles for each member of a secondary staff relative to literacy instruction While every content teacher is not a reading teacher, every teacher needs to teach students in how to read content. Literacy coaches may be necessary but aren�t sufficient Some students require more intensive, systematic, explicit instruction of content, strategies, and skills

20. Content Literacy �Synergy� � Point # 4: A framework for a comprehensive and coordinated approach. COST EFFECTIVE IN THAT FEWER NEED INTENSIVE INSTRUCTION � Starts with general education. All levels are linked and overlap. NOT segregated, isolated programs and services. A school wide model. Supports SIM AND other programs/interventions� Point # 4: A framework for a comprehensive and coordinated approach. COST EFFECTIVE IN THAT FEWER NEED INTENSIVE INSTRUCTION � Starts with general education. All levels are linked and overlap. NOT segregated, isolated programs and services. A school wide model. Supports SIM AND other programs/interventions

21. Tier 1: Universal Screening Content pegged to local, state or national standards Brief (minutes per student) Administered 3-4 times per year Capable of giving useful printouts for analysis of: Individual student performance on skills Performance of groups in relation to benchmarks

22. What domains should be screened at the secondary level? Basic skills? Study/organizational skills? Other?

23. Data Analysis Teaming Teams of like teachers working together to� Access critical data on all students� performance related to achievement of standards Analyze data and find which students have which gaps in attainments Set measurable goals to close the gap Brainstorm or create instructional strategies Based on Michael Schmoker�s Results.Based on Michael Schmoker�s Results.

24. Teaming During RTI

25. How can teaming be organized at the secondary level? Site-based literacy teams Teachers working across subject areas Teachers working within subject areas

26. Tier 2: Strategic Phase Use of standard protocol interventions Supplemental materials in general ed. Differentiated instruction in general ed. Short-term interventions (10-20 weeks) Progress monitored twice per month (minimum)

27. A standard protocol intervention� is scientifically based. has a high probability of producing change for large numbers of students. is designed to be used in a standard manner across students. is usually delivered in small groups. is often scripted or very structured. can be orchestrated by a problem-solving team.

28. Strategic interventions at the secondary level What are the targets for intervention? What interventions are available? How can progress be monitored? How can support services be orchestrated within a typical secondary school schedule? Or, should we change how secondary schools are organized?

29. Tier 3: Targeted Phase Use of standard protocols Supplemental instructional materials Small intensive groups outside the general ed. classroom Managed by remedial or special educators Progress monitored twice per week Interventions usually over extended periods

30. �Special-education-like Instruction�(McMaster et al., 2003) Immediate corrective feedback Mastery of content before moving to next lesson More time on activities that were especially difficult More opportunities to respond Fewer transitions Setting goals and self-monitoring progress Special relationship with tutor

31. Strategic interventions at the targeted level What are the targets for intervention? What interventions are available? How can progress be monitored? How can support services be orchestrated? What team formats are needed? What is the interface with special education?

32. Determining eligibility for special education using RTI at the secondary level What data will be available? How can treatment fidelity be assessed? What other assessment procedures are indicated?

33. Internet Resources http://www.centeroninstruction.org/resources.cfm?category=reading&subcategory=materials&grade_start=6&grade_end=12#130 http://www.stupski.org/publications/index. http://www.csos.jhu.edu/tdhs/rsch/Locating_Dropouts.pdf http://www.silentepidemic.org/pdfs/balfanz.pdf http://web.jhu.edu/CSOS/images/Balfanz_Keeping_Middle_Grade_Students_on_the_Path_to_High_School_Graduation.pdf

34. http://www.betterhighschools.org/docs/NHSC_ApproachestoDropoutPrevention.pdf http://www.act.org/path/policy/pdf/reading_report.pdf http://www.all4ed.org/files/archive/publications/WritingNext/WritingNext.pdf http://www.ncset.org/publications/essentialtools/dropout/dropout.pdf http://www.achieve.org/files/FINAL-dropouts_0.pdf http://www.csrq.org/documents/WorksInProgressReport_Web.pdf http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2006/06nov06/06drop.html>