240 likes | 252 Views
Explore the significance of Risk Management Program, General Duty Clause, EPA Enforcement, and more under CAA Section 112(r) in this comprehensive update. Learn about key elements, filing requirements, and EPA's enforcement initiatives.
E N D
Hot Topics in CAA – 112(r)Federal Program Update GA AWMA REGULATORY UPDATE CONFERENCE Adam G. Sowatzka April 16, 2013
Agenda • Background • Risk Management Program • General Duty Clause • EPA Enforcement • Questions
Why Address Risk Management? • Congressional response to preventing further major chemical accidents: • Bhopal, India (Methyl Isocyanate release, 2,800 deaths, 1984) • Institute, West Virginia (100 plus injured, 1985) • Pasadena, Texas (plastics plant fire, 23 deaths, 1989) • http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=3l2PQEjMnnM
Risk Management Program – Federal Statutory Provisions • EPCRA – Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (SARA Title III), Sections 302-312 • CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, Section 103 • CAA – Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7), Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions and Risk Management Plans; and Section 112(r)(1) General Duty Clause
CAA Section 112(r) • Regulatory requirement for subject facilities to file a Risk Management Plan (RMP) by June 21, 1999 or before covered chemical is on site • Includes “General Duty Clause” (GDC) requiring facilities to consider hazards and minimize risk posed by chemicals
Who is subject to the RMP regulations? • Stationary sources that have more than a threshold quantity (TQ) of a listed substance • EPA has developed a list of chemicals: • 77 toxic • 63 flammable • If a facility stores one of these chemicals at quantities greater than a TQ….. THE FACILITY MUST HAVE A RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Key Elements of RMP • Employee participation plan • Process safety information (documentation of the process) • Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) • Operating procedures • Operator training • Contractor evaluation and selection • Pre-start-up safety reviews
Key Elements of RMP Cont’d • Mechanical integrity program • Hot work permitting process • Management of Change (MOC) • Incident investigation • Emergency planning and response • Compliance audits
RMP Filing • Facilities must resubmit RMPs at 5 year intervals • There are additional/on-going responsibilities − it is not a static program that ends with filing of RMP • Certification of receipt and completion from RMP Reporting Center does not indicate that an RMP is in compliance with regulations
Important Dates Reported in RMPs • Process Hazard Analysis (PHAs), compliance audits, and SOP review dates • Red flags: • Leaving these entries blank or having future dates • Having dates (as of the filing) that are more than 5 years, 3 years, and 1 year past due
PHAs and Compliance Audits • Must be performed by proper personnel • Corrective actions/recommendations required for noted deficiencies • If completion dates are not shown in facility documentation, objective quality evidence is required
General Duty Clause – CAA §112(r)(1) • Statutory requirement, effective as of November 1990 • No list of covered substances, no threshold quantities • No reporting requirement, information sharing with public not required • No exemptions or exclusions
General Duty Clause – CAA §112(r)(1) • The owners and operators of stationary sources producing, processing, handling or storing such substances [i.e., a chemical in 40 CFR part 68 or any other extremely hazardous substance] have a general duty [in the same manner and to the same extent as the general duty clause in the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)] to identify hazards which may result from (such) releases using appropriate hazard assessment techniques, to design and maintain a safe facility taking such steps as are necessary to prevent releases, and to minimize the consequences of accidental releases which do occur.
Substances Covered Under GDC • Extremely hazardous substances • Short-term exposures associated with releases to air may cause death, injury, or property damage due to toxicity, reactivity, flammability, volatility, or corrosivity • Includes, but not limited to, RMP list of toxic and flammable substances
Facility Responsibilities Under GDC • Identify hazards of chemicals, and assess impact of potential releases • Design and maintain safe facilities • Follow codes, standards, and other business practices • Minimize consequences of accidental releases
GDC – Considerations for Safe Practices • What are similar businesses doing to minimize hazard? • Codes and standard practices • EPA and other Safety Alerts, Case Studies, and Investigation Reports • Trade association guidelines • What is the accident history of my industrial sector? • Lessons learned
EPA’s Enforcement Initiatives Fiscal Years 2011-2013: • Preventing the release of raw sewage and contaminated stormwater • Preventing animal waste from contaminating surface and ground waters • Cutting toxic air pollution that affects health • Reducing air pollution from largest sources • Reducing pollution from mineral processing operations • Assuring energy extraction sector compliance
EPA Enforcement Overview • Inspection • Information request • Administrative Compliance Order • Penalty action • Administrative • Judicial Referral • Criminal
Questions Adam G. Sowatzka Partner King & Spalding 1180 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30309-3521 Direct: 404-572-3508 Fax: 404-572-5136 Cell: 770-309-5349 asowatzka@kslaw.com www.kslaw.com