250 likes | 615 Views
E N D
1. Testing an off-axis parabolic mirror with a CGH and a spherical mirror as null lens Chunyu Zhao
Rene Zehnder
Jim Burge
Buddy Martin
College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona
2. Outline The mirror to be tested
Testing system design and assembly
Optical alignment
Initial testing result
Summary
3. The mirror Off-axis parabolic mirror with 1.6m diameter of clear aperture
Parent: f/0.7 parabola with 7.7m ROC.
Offset from the parent vertex: 1.84m
4. Surface profile P-V: 2.767mm
RMS: 508um
RMS asti: 497um
RMS coma: 108um
RMS trifoil: 9um
RMS spherical: 5.8um
Residue: 2.5um
5. Surface quality spec Lower bending mode can be subtracted by the following amount:
Astigmatism: 200nm
Coma: 17nm
Trefoil: 50nm
Quatrefoil: 20nm
Spherical: 25nm
Residual:
40nm rms
6. Requirement for testing system Amount of lower order mode:
Astigmatism: 170nm
Coma: 15nm
Trefoil: 42nm
Quatrefoil: 17nm
Spherical: 20nm
Residual:
20nm rms
7. System Configuration A spherical mirror removes most of astigmatism and some coma residual 0? astigmatism 22um and coma 46um
A CGH removes rest of the aberrations.
8. Lens + CGH + Spherical Mirror
9. Error Budget
10. Residual wavefront errors Total allowed: 40nm
Testing system budget: 20nm
Errors in lens, CGH and spherical mirror will be backed out
11. Optical Bench and Testing Tower
12. NST testing system System assembled and aligned in lab
13. Alignment Using CGH patterns to align the CGH itself
Using CGH patterns and metering rods to align the spherical mirror
Additional CGH patterns to create cross hairs for position the test mirror
14. The CGHs 10 segments create 8 wavefronts.
Main CGH creates the testing wavefront.
The ring type CGH aligns the substrate to the interferometer.
3 segments create a crosshair and 1 segment creates a clocking line to align the NST mirror to the test optics.
4 circular CGHs send beams to align the lateral positions of the 4 balls mounted on the surface of the fold sphere.
15. Alignment of CGH With the reflection fringes from the alignment CGH controlled to ?0.5? in power, the CGH substrate is aligned within ?7µm.
16. Alignment of spherical mirror Position a ball at focus of the 0th order diffraction beam after CGH, use it as a reference to position the spherical mirror.
Put a few balls at the mirror surface, patches of CGH direct spherical beams toward the ball and the reflection fringes are used to position the balls accurately in lateral direction, and metering rod with LVDTs are used to control the distance from these balls to the ball at focus. The mirror is adjusted so that all the balls are at proper position.
17. Metering rod calibration
18. Metering rod calibration bench
19. Spherical mirror is aligned with metering rods.
4 balls mounted on the mirror surface. Their lateral positions are controlled with beams from the CGHs. Small stages position the balls laterally to give retroreflection.
Initial alignment scheme based on reflected wavefront did not work. New scheme based on reflected image is being implemented.
1 ball mounted on the 0th order beam focus. Its position is controlled by nulling the reflection fringes from its surface.
Metering rods lengths are calibrated to ?3 µm. Alignment of spherical mirror relative to CGH
20. A crosshair and a clocking line are generated by CGHs to align the NST mirror to the test optics. Aligning the test mirror: projected crosshair and clocking line
21. Initial testing results
22. Morphed surface map P-V: 8.6 wave
RMS: 1.5 wave
23. Summary We have built a system for interferometrically testing an off-axis parabolic mirror
A CGH and a spherical mirror is used as null lens
Initial testing results are encouraging
Experience and know-how acquired will be applied to testing GMT mirrors which are 5x scale off-axis parabolas