1 / 14

Report from the Detector R&D Liaisons

AWLC, Fermilab , May 12 - 16, 2014. Report from the Detector R&D Liaisons. Jan Strube (Tohoku University) / Maxim Titov (CEA S aclay ). * Aerial view at night, Chicago, Illinois. LCC Physics and Detectors Executive Board.

charlotte-frank
Download Presentation

Report from the Detector R&D Liaisons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AWLC, Fermilab, May 12 - 16, 2014 Report from the Detector R&D Liaisons Jan Strube (Tohoku University) / Maxim Titov (CEA Saclay) *Aerial view at night, Chicago, Illinois

  2. LCC Physics and Detectors Executive Board • LC DETECTOR R&D LIAISONS: Maxim Titov (Liaison), Jan Strube (Deputy Liaison) • CHARGE: • The detector R&D liaison ensuresproductivecommunicationbetween the LCC Physics • and DetectorsExecutive Board and detectorR&D groups. The liaison is a member of the • Executive Board and communicates relevant information from the Executive Board to • detector R&D groups and vice versa. • The liaison is in contact with all detector R&D groups relevant to linear colliders to keep • track of the overall detector R&D efforts conducted or planned for linear colliders and • to periodically compile summaries of the efforts. • There are many forms of Detector R&Ds relevant to LC: • ‘Large collaborations’ such as CALICE, LCTPC, FCAL… • Collection of many efforts such as the vertexing R&Ds • Individual group R&D activities • Efforts currently not directly included in the concept groups (ILD, SiD, CLIC), which may become important for LC in future

  3. LC Detector Challenges: The Higgs is an Important Driving Factor • Two approaches (ILD and SiD) – Similar Concepts, Different Realizations SiD ILD CLIC • Major accomplishments during the last few years: • ILC: June 2013 - Detailed Baseline Design (DBD) Report in ILC TDR: • http://www.linearcollider.org/ILC/Publications/Technical-Design-Report • DBD is not the TDR which is the next goal: •  Major Engineering efforts and More R&D are still needed • CLIC: 2012 Conceptual Design Report: • http://clic-study.org/accelerator/CLIC-ConceptDesignRep.php • Starting from ILC Detector Concepts: •  redesign forward region (higher bkg) and calorimetry (higher energy jets) •  precise hit timing ~10 ns (vertex) and ~ 1 ns (calo) • Successful cooperation between ILC and CLIC  Synergy in Detector R&D Studies

  4. Detector R&D Liaison Report GOAL: Shape up-to-date efforts report of the LC Detector R&Ds (this is not an attempt to control different R&Ds, rather collection of information for people to use !)  Updateof the R&D developments since ILC DBD and CLIC CDR  Summarize contributions of individual group R&D efforts  Aim for document of < 100 pages  Timescale – Linear Collider Workshop in Belgrade (Oct. 2014)  could help new groups to learn about the current landscape of the R&D activities Chronopixel CMOS DEPFET CALICE groups LCTPC groups • Concentrate on the R&D activities for the ILD/ SiDConcepts • Discuss synergy between ILC and CLIC developments • Group individual R&Ds based on vertexing, tracking, calorimetry, …

  5. Inputs to the Report from the Individual R&D Groups • Individual ILC / CLIC R&D Groups are asked to provide (max. 1-2) summary, • specifically addressing the following points: • Major R&D efforts (past and present) and recent developments since ILC DBD • (with publications/references to major results); • Engineering challenges; • Detector R&D plans for the coming years; • List of collaborating institutes (contributing to this R&D technology); • Perspectives of this R&D for applications beyond the ILC (with references if • technology is already used in the other projects) and will be asked to summarize major activities in the table:

  6. Inputs to the Report from the Individual R&D Groups Major R&D efforts (past and present) and recent developments since ILC DBD (with publications/references to major results)  short introduction into technology and summary of the new results since DBD/CDR.Goal is to include also earlier R&Ds developments, in particular, those currently not directly adopted by the ILD, SiD or CLICdp detector concepts (and thus not included in the DBD or CDR) and/or to describe new/emerging R&Ds Engineering challenges (probably the most challenging question)  most of the ILC detector technologies are mature enough and are ready to go. Engineering aspects are less advanced and need some more years before finalized. Engineering challenges are related to the system integration aspects (e.g., minimization of the material amount in the vertex system to achieve flavor tagging requirements). Since this report will serve as the “entrance point” to the new groups, it would be beneficial if new groups will decide to contribute to the engineering aspects, and not only to the basic detector R&D efforts. Detector R&D plans for the coming years; List of collaborating institutes (contributing to this R&D technology)  goal is to summarize individual group plans (if sufficient funding is available), including engineering challenges

  7. Inputs to the Report from the Individual R&D Groups Perspectives of this R&D for applications beyond the ILC (with references if technology is already used in the other projects)  number of the LC R&D developments has been successfully used in other HEP experiments and its extend and the number of spin-offs continue to grow (some groups continue detector R&Ds jointly for ILC and other HEP projects). These synergies are important to advance the image of the LC Detector R&D for the HEP field, in general. • THIS IS A CALL TO SUBMIT YOUR CONTRIBUTION to the “Detector R&D Liaison Report“  please send your inputs to • Jan Strube (jstrube@epx.phys.tohoku.ac.jp), Maxim Titov (maxim.titov@cea.fr) • Some R&D groups have already been contacted and asked to answer questionnaire •  ~ 40 % of groups already provided their summaries (some groups sent us also • 50-100 pages documents prepared for review panels or funding agencies) • Too much variations in the received inputs  need substantial editing •  All groups will be able to see/comment on the report (before it will become • public). The goal is to have such "efforts review" document ready for Belgrade • LCC 2014 meeting.

  8. Pixel-Vertex and Si-Strip Tracking R&D Groups (contacted by May 12th) CMOS for STAR DEPFET for Belle II CLIC (hybrid pixels): thin Si-sensor +Timepix

  9. Gaseous Tracking (LCTPC) R&D Groups (contacted by May 12th) ~ 70 pages http://ecfa-dp.desy.de/

  10. Calorimeter (CALICE) R&D Groups (contacted by May 12th) AHCAL

  11. Calorimeter R&D Groups (contacted by May 12th) ECFA Detector R&D Panel: http://ecfa-dp.desy.de ~ 70 pages Synergies between CLIC - ILC: FCAL (BeamCal) sensors:

  12. Detector R&D Liaison Report Aim is to deliver a “coherent summary”(LC Detector R&D Efforts Review)  group individual R&Ds (based on technology) and summarize them in the tables

  13. Vertex Detector R&D Concepts: Example of Summary Table Preliminary

  14. Summary and Outlook • LC Detector R&D Liaison Report starts to wrap up its initial shape • We encourage all individual R&D groups to answer questionnaire and • to provide us inputs summarizing your past and future detector efforts • Any comments /suggestions are appreciated

More Related