150 likes | 384 Views
2/15/2012. Integrity - Service - Innovation. 2. Overview. DFAS ObjectiveBAM MethodologyBAM ImplementationExpected Outcomes. 2/15/2012. Integrity - Service - Innovation. 3. Most internal control assessment methodologies apply a sequential approach:Plan Document, Access and Test RemediateThis traditional assessment approach normally produces small and much delayed returns since the focus is on rework and reaction, not on the early detection and remediation of31574
E N D
1. Integrity - Service - Innovation AGA Audio Conference Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)
Ms. Martha Smith
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
February, 2008
2. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 2 Overview
DFAS Objective
BAM Methodology
BAM Implementation
Expected Outcomes
3. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 3 Most internal control assessment methodologies apply a sequential approach:
Plan Document, Access and Test Remediate
This traditional assessment approach normally produces small and much delayed returns since the focus is on rework and reaction, not on the early detection and remediation of deficiencies that are costing DFAS significant amounts of money every day. DFAS Objective
4. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 4 Plan Document, Access and Test Remediate
An Enterprise Risk Management Program (ERMP)/BAM capability will produce significant savings for DFAS by focusing the compliance assessment process on results of real-time or near-real time Business Activity Monitoring and the integration of that capability within an enterprise risk management program.
This approach will allow DFAS to prioritize compliance efforts on key business processes and associated control activities that have a high financial impact and maximize overall savings by preventing further losses. DFAS Objective
5. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 5 DFAS Objective
The solution will help DFAS in fulfilling the following Federal requirements:
Presidents Management Agenda
Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990
Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982
OMB Circular A-123 (Rev.), Managements Responsibility for Internal Controls
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
Improper Payments Information Act of 2002
Prompt Payment Act of 1997
Government Waste Corrections Act of 1999 and 2000
6. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 6 DFAS Objective Enterprise Risk Management Program/Business Activity Monitoring (ERMP/BAM) will:
Highlight, identify, monitor and track weaknesses in processes and systems
Alert senior managers of current and potential problem areas
Provide real time or near real time analysis of current and projected deficiencies
Reduce improper payments
Assist and supplement internal, operational and pre and post payment review processes
Help to identify problem areas BEFORE an incident occurs
7. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 7
8. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 8 BAM Methodology
9. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 9 BAM Methodology, continued
10. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 10 BAM Implementation Process
11. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 11 Cycle 1, Spiral 1, Process Flowchart
12. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 12 Cycle 1 FBWT C1P1S2 Process Flow
13. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 13 Cycle 2 Phase I OnePay Process Flow
14. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 14 Cycle 3 READ Process Flow
15. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 15 Need for BAM
16. 2/16/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 16 Expected Outcomes Efficient Operations