1 / 30

Repositories and the Learning Experience: Using a Repository for Learning & Support Prof Mark Stiles - Staffordshire

Repositories and the Learning Experience: Using a Repository for Learning & Support Prof Mark Stiles - Staffordshire University. Sestri Sept 2009. To store and manage the University and SURF collection of learning resources and other associated scholarly outputs.

chase
Download Presentation

Repositories and the Learning Experience: Using a Repository for Learning & Support Prof Mark Stiles - Staffordshire

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Repositories and the Learning Experience:Using a Repository for Learning & SupportProf Mark Stiles - Staffordshire University Sestri Sept 2009

  2. To store and manage the University and SURF collection of learning resources and other associated scholarly outputs. provide flexible delivery of e-learning content and resources facilitate re-use and re-purposing of learning content improve archiving, auditing and version control processes facilitate avoidance of lock-in by freeing content from vendor systems provide workflow for quality assurance processes, metadata, rights management, etc Our initial drivers?

  3. VLE use “can” be innovative but: Are they creating a new orthodoxy? Do they encourage the “mundane” Are they tying us down for the future? Are they now a barrier? The VLE as straightjacket?

  4. From 2005 JISC MLE “Landscape Study” of UK HE and FE consultation document: …the results also show two thirds of modules of study being web supplemented which would seem to indicate that the ‘stuff your notes into your VLE’ model is prevalent and increasing What are we doing with VLEs?

  5. Are we producing bloated systems?

  6. The “new” Web Sharing Collaboration Learner initiated Informal learning Diverse communities Outside institutional control Unstoppable? Other drivers…

  7. The future VLE?

  8. The future? • Tutors and learners will build their own toolsets from: • what is provided by the institution • what they have on their own (personal) computer • what is available on the Web • Learners will: • “opt out” of systems institutions and tutors might prefer them to use for formal learning activities • initiate “sharing” and “community” activities outside of formal learning using tools they have chosen • engage with wider and more diverse communities

  9. What we decided in 05/06… • “Loosening the bonds”: • Diversifying delivery • Repository based • Extraction of QAed resources • Promote reuse and repurposing • Include “novel” resources • Delivery to VLEs, Portals, Portfolios and Web 2.0 tools • Tested by JISC Projects (SURF WBL-Way)

  10. Choose a commercial ‘off the shelf’ solution Use internal resources to integrate repository with existing systems Ensure solution can support QA etc procedures and not impact negatively on them API functionality as selection criteria only for extending functionality or external integration Standards and specifications conformance for content and interoperability Integration with VLEs so resources may be delivered in a controlled environment Flexible and customisable set of features allowing different metadata schemes etc to be used Consultant Recommendations…

  11. Prime focus on being a learning repository Excellent integration with VLEs Built in for Blackboard and Moodle Can extract existing content and serve back to any system IMS conformance Technical compatibility with existing expertise Good workflow and metadata features Java-based APIs Our Choice… • Successful demonstration of required features • Flexibility in negotiation • Willing to provide additional R&D licence • Made University a research partner • Good deployment support included

  12. Training for “Propeller Heads” and “Repository Management” Updated to Hive 3.0 and contributed to revised BB integration Preparing for the “big suck” from Blackboard Working on Configuration with project sub-groups Developing ongoing roles, processes and policies Harvest Road partner in JISC project with SURF partners So we…

  13. “Agility and Flexibility” A repository to: promote use of new technologies promote reuse & repurposing deliver to diverse systems provide access at point of need remove “one size fits” escape lock-in resources for more than the learner Portals to support the facilitator and learner… work-based mentors, employers, admin access to learner information for learners contextual access Some ways forward…

  14. Work-Based Learning

  15. Work-Based Learning Links to: Resources in Hive Thesis Colleges Twitter feeds RSS Feeds etc

  16. Managing Learning Resources Hive – feeding the WBL Support Point:

  17. An “opportunity” arose! • University Executive Business Plan 2007-2012 includes: • • To take a new approach to course and product development: • Increase engagement with employers on work-based learning and other workforce development initiatives • Establish a robust new product development process that is market-facing and customer-focused • To grow and sustain alliances, networks and partnerships • Further develop SURF college network and other appropriate FE partnerships • To enhance customer experience • Increase the number of students who stay and successfully complete their courses • Integrate systematic customer feedback mechanisms into a robust framework for the measurement and improvement of customer satisfaction • To exploit technological advances • Develop a technical infrastructure (networks, mobile technology) that supports integrated business systems, administration, formal, informal and flexible learning • Implement new and existing learning and teaching media to support effective e-learning and delivery

  18. I was empowered… • University Technology Supported Learning (TSL) Plan includes: • Implement effective management of learning resources and course related information – XCRi built into Hive • Expand TSL for Flexible Learning, WBL and BCE and the strengthening of SURF and other partnerships – Hive linked to WBL Portals and facilities for partner colleges • Put in place a system of learner-focused Quality Enhancement for TSL and diversify the delivery of TSL – Validation outputs in Hive linked to CoP, all VLE content moved to Hive • • Disseminate good practice and build effective staff development in TSL – Hive linked to POOT, ELearning Models and other CoPs • • Improve the administration of TSL • • Implement a technical infrastructure to allow TSL applications to be introduced/removed in a flexible and responsive way

  19. From the TSL Plan: • need to respect the need for appropriately distinct andindividual approaches by Faculties and course teams • policy should be sufficient to guide practice but apply the minimum level of control necessary and avoid needless bureaucracy • It is all about sustaining innovation…

  20. Managing Learning Resources • Our repository – Hive from Giunti Labs • Used for WBL, WBL-Way, DIVAS and ENABLE • Media trials with Faculties • Migration of Blackboard content tested • Blackboard integration ready but waiting for BB and Hive upgrades • Roll-out as full service by IS being organised

  21. Our “Hive” Experiences • Single store of learning content - enables true management of content • Scalability/distributed cache • Allows quick scaling with demand • Essential for a ‘centre-piece’ system • High availability/enterprise pack • Excellent technical support • Comprehensive Web services - Essential for diverse delivery • Hive 4 Java/application server platform • Ability to run on Glassfish • Fits nicely with our skill set and preferred technologies

  22. The University as organisation excessive hierarchy and over-heavy bureaucracy, the comfort of ingrained routines, strong vertical command structures and weak lateral and bottom-up communication, unbalanced and non-integrated authority across professional domains, conservatism and risk aversion, territoriality, defensiveness and insecurity as well as wilfulness (Middlehurst, 1998) The individual experts may be highly innovative within a specialist domain, but the difficulties of coordination across functions and disciplines impose severe limits on the innovative capability of the organization as a whole. (Lam, 2005)

  23. A major university change initiative supported by JISC funding • Focused on the complete curriculum design/development process • Designed to connect our many initiatives and join them up without holes • Designed to find a way to sustain and manage innovation and change for the organisation • Led by LDI, it involves Faculties, Services, Partners, Employers and Learners • Senior Management Group chaired by Gill Howland • Funded until April 2012 • “Our last best hope” (Apologies to Babylon 5)

  24. Issues

  25. HEFCE funded one year programme – run by JISC/HEA UK OER Pilots subject institution individual support function – covering technical, legal, strategic advice, workshops, support for deposit and aggregation of materials, communities of practice. Based around existing JISC services and the OU “SCORE” project. Programme Management OER infokit – a “how to” guide for future work evaluation & synthesis function

  26. OpenStaffs • University is committed to making a wide range of learning and teaching resources freely available and easily discovered, with the facility and rights for the content to be re-used by both educators and learners. • Mandate • Giunti and Blackboard project partners

  27. OpenStaffs

  28. WBL-WAY Project: http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/WBLWAY/ Facebook Group on Control and Innovation: http://staffs.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6572643972 ENABLE Project: http://jiscenable.blogspot.com/ OpenStaffs OER Pilot: http://www.staffs.ac.uk/about_us/projects/openstaffs/index.jsp Information…

  29. Thank you for your time and patience m.j.stiles@staffs.ac.uk

More Related