300 likes | 408 Views
Teleconference May 4, 2010. John S. Cundiff, Professor Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Tech. Big square bale system: 1. Used for commercial hay industry 2. Much development already completed and more in process (DOE Feedstock Logistics Projects)
E N D
TeleconferenceMay 4, 2010 John S. Cundiff, Professor Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Tech
Big square bale system: 1. Used for commercial hay industry 2. Much development already completed and more in process (DOE Feedstock Logistics Projects) 3. Not appropriate for many areas in the Southeast
Truckload of big square bales: 25 ton @ 15% MC = 21.2 dry ton Truckload of round bales: 12.5 ton @ 15% MC = 10.6 dry ton
Bioenergy Industry Why the SE? Why the round bale?
Why the round bale? • It allows the uncoupling of the baling and in-field hauling operations • The round bale (net wrapped) protects itself in uncovered storage • Round balers are used for existing cattle operations and the energy crop harvest occurs at a different time. The additional annual operating hours benefits both enterprises.
Do we want the “plantation” model? or Do we want a bioenergy industry where the smallest farmgate contract is 100 ac?
Farmgate Contract If my contract is to grow, harvest in net-wrapped round bales, and place in a Satellite Storage Location, then the 100 ac minimum is viable. If my contract is to grow, harvest as big square bales, store in covered storage, and deliver x loads per week to the bioenergy plant, then the 100 ac minimum is not viable.
Why not sell herbaceous biomass standing in the field---like woody biomass? Works for crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) in some locations. Does not work for switchgrass. Why?
If my profit depends on the productivity of my switchgrass stand over the 10-y life of my contract, I do not want a contractor coming into my field and damaging the stand. Very important issue for a winter harvest in the SE!
Which is preferable? 200 round balers under the control of 200 farmgate contract holders seeking winter harvest opportunities across the entire 30-mi radius feedstock supply area… OR 20 big square balers under the control of 20 contractors
How much is the “robustness” of the round bale system worth to the bioenergy industry? (Think about a winter harvest in the Southeast---there are a lot of days when the fields are too wet for baling.) At what point will the industry be ready to pay for robustness?
Ideal Conditions Is baling cost ($/ton) higher for the round bale? yes Is hauling cost ($/ton) higher for the round bale? Maybe not!
Big Square Bale • 25 ton load • 40 min to load • 25 mi haul, average speed 45 mph • 10 min to unload • 10 h workday
Big Square Bale 125 ton/d/truck
Round Bale • 12.5 ton load • 10 min to load • 25 mi haul, average speed 45 mph • 10 min to unload • 24 h workday
Round Bale 207.5 ton/d/truck or 66% more than the big square bale
Is there a cost-effective way to load in 10 min? Is there a cost-effective way to haul 24 h?
Do you need a large forklift at unload 16-bale racks at the Receiving Facility? yes Do you need a large forklift to load 16-bale racks at the SSL? Yes
Is the forklift at the Receiving Facility a disadvantage? no Is the forklift at the SSL a disadvantage? yes
Summary Is the harvest cost (baling and in-field hauling) higher for the 5x4 round bale? yes (neglecting the robustness factor) Is the storage cost higher? no Is the hauling cost higher? ??? Is the Receiving Facility cost higher? NO
Summary Will “seamless” logistics ever be important?