1 / 10

Ennett , Bauman and Koch 1994

Ennett , Bauman and Koch 1994. The Spec requires that you:. Describe and Evaluate one study to be selected from ……. Ennett et al (1994) variability in cigarette smoking within and between adolescent friendship cliques.

cheri
Download Presentation

Ennett , Bauman and Koch 1994

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ennett, Bauman and Koch 1994

  2. The Spec requires that you: • Describe and Evaluate one study to be selected from ……. • Ennett et al (1994) variability in cigarette smoking within and between adolescent friendship cliques.

  3. Aim: To investigate the role of friendship groups and cliques in the smoking behaviour of adolescence.

  4. Can you name the…… • Method • Sample • Controls • Design • Extraneous / participant variables • Now can you write an account of how this was carried out?

  5. A total of 87 cliques were identified comprised of 461 adolescence. Average clique size was 5 members. 42.2% of the sample participants were in a clique. • What is a clique? • Those not in cliques were called isolates, 28.6% of the total sample. • Liaisons were participants who were friends with other adolescence but not in a clique, which accounted for 29.2% of the sample.

  6. Individuals Assessment for group membership

  7. What do these results show?PROPORTION OF CURRENT SMOKERS BY FRIENDSHIP PATTERNS BY SCHOOL (N=1092)

  8. Results • 414/461 were non smokers • 59/87 were totally non-smoking cliques • 2/87 cliques contained smoking only members • The smoking rate of clique members was 11.1% • The overall smoking rate in schools was 15.2% • Clique members displayed high levels of homogeneity (similar behaviour) – this was most apparent in all female, all white cliques, and cliques where mothers had a lower standard of education • Smoking behaviour in cliques compared to non cliques was significant to 5% (but achieve 0.1% level in 2/5 of the schools) From this data, use the statistics in infer 3 findings from this study:

  9. Conclusions – finish that sentence! • Adolescences that smoke tend to associate with ………. • Clique membership contributes more to non-smoking behaviour than……… • Membership of a non-smoking clique supports the maintenance of ……… • This does / does not support the notion of social learning theory as an explanation of substance misuse.

  10. Now you need to be able to evaluate the study: • Design • Reliability and Validity • Ethnocentric • Ethics • Evidence to support • Androcentric • Application • Method • Sample

More Related