170 likes | 339 Views
Background - NatureServe. Findings of Moore foundation sponsored survey of conservation information users and study of the need for conservation information systems.Respondents ranked management of observations data
E N D
1.
2. Background - NatureServe Findings of Moore foundation sponsored survey of conservation information users and study of the need for conservation information systems.
Respondents ranked management of observations data #1 need
Consistency in observation systems and resulting data would pay significant dividends
Growing network demand for tools to manage observation data
A Biotics 5 module prototype
3. Needs for Successfully Managing Biodiversity Information in Parks Canada include:
ability to integrate information from all Park Field Units & taxonomic groups
ability to integrate data across provinces and territories, and with other federal & international agencies
use of common database to manage and integrate observation records from Parks
ability to access, retrieve & analyze data at Field Units, Regional Service Centres, and National Office Specific ObjectivesParks Canada
4. PCA-CDC Data Flow
6. Challenges Variability in data model - differences in protocols and methodology
Field observations
Plot surveys
Tracking
Cost of ownership
Data sensitivity (variable access rights and data management privileges)
Social & institutional barriers to sharing
8. Functionality Web-based data entry
Supported by multiple online web services
On-line mapping via ArcGIS Server
Kestrel application server (editing\reporting)
Taxonomic web service (NS national/subnational, or completely different source)
Oracle/SDE backend
Import from Excel (part of template creation)
Basic reporting
Export to CSV and GML
Secure access (Security at multiple levels)
Logon access
Survey access
Sensitive data access
Specific user privileges
Multiple languages
11. Templates Can support establish protocol, e.g.
Heritage Methodology
Invasive species
CI Rapid Assessment
Citizen Bird Survey
Or be constructed for adhoc survey
Signed by author/organization
Enables tracking of usage, users and subsequent modifications
12. How it works
13. How it works
14. How it works
15. Template Authoring Tool and Attribute Library - Proposed Premise: no one wants to reinvent the wheel
Shared Community Resource
Attributes and Attribute Collections
Rich UI for defining and editing attributes and collections
Rich UI for search and browse of library holdings
Open Source social arrangements
Roles: owner, contributor, user
Bug and enhancement tracking
Community forums
Reporting on usage ? esteem authors
Benefits
Saves time: reuse over reinvention
Reuse directly enables aggregation and downstream analysis
16. Project Status Version 1.0
First release for Parks Canada - June 2007
Pilot project now underway
Evaluate options for hosting environment
Test with local data from 4 pilot PCA sites and with multiple templates
Banff - Alberta
Bruce Peninsula - Ontario
Cape Breton Highlands - Nova Scotia
Terra Nova - Newfoundland and Labrador
Implement priority requirements
Field test application and revise