200 likes | 298 Views
How to sustain interest in gender equality policies during a recession?. Jill Rubery Manchester Business School. Outline. From He-cession to She-(au)sterity Resisting marginalisation Maintaining visibility and legitimation Preserving the public space Future for gender equality.
E N D
How to sustain interest in gender equality policies during a recession? Jill Rubery Manchester Business School
Outline • From He-cession to She-(au)sterity • Resisting marginalisation • Maintaining visibility and legitimation • Preserving the public space • Future for gender equality
From He-cession to She-(au)sterity • Initial recession hit male employment- concentrated in manufacturing and construction • Employment protection partially provided by public expenditure- continuing increases in health and education • Reduction in gender gaps through levelling down
Countering the he-cession perceptions • Women’s employment losses need to be considered in context of need to ‘catch up’ with men - should be considered against trends not just in absolute terms • The levelling down process may be reinforcing the flexibilisation of the labour market- women’s poor quality job standards becoming the norm for some men as well as women. • The switch to austerity policies makes it almost certain that women will suffer most in the current/next phase- unless the indirect impact on the private sector is even greater.
From he-cession to she-(au)sterity Public sector adjustment impacts on women through: • Wage cuts and freezes • Job cuts/ freezes • Outsourcing • Reductions in services • Reductions in benefits- lone mothers/ child support
2. Resisting marginalisation • Limited evidence of voluntary withdrawal of women • Rise in female headed households ( whether planned or unplanned) • High level of open unemployment where previously more hidden (UK) • Major rise in involuntary part-time work
Reasons why policy-makers may not be able to marginalise gender equality issues • Women’s non marginal contribution to household income makes back to the home policy often not feasible • Women’s independent attachment to the labour market especially among higher educated makes them less of a reserve army. • Need for state support for parents will not disappear- for example policy of forcing lone parents into work undermined by lack of jobs and need for care provision.
3.Maintaining visibility and legitimation Visibility • Gender equality has been removed from central status in EU employment strategy- reappearance in piecemeal fashion • Dismantling of equality institutions and equality budgets in some countries – e.g. Ireland, Spain, UK
EU2020 Overview • Three priorities plus enhanced economic governance • Smart Growth - an economy based on knowledge and innovation • Sustainable Development - a low carbon economy • Inclusive Growth - high employment, acquisition of skills, fight poverty and exclusion • Ten Guidelines • Four mention gender but rest gender blind • Four on employment (no mention of gender in education and training systems) • Seven Flagship Policies • None focused on gender • All with no evidence of gender mainstreaming and only the (delayed) European Platform against Poverty recognised greater risks for women • Eight Targets • Four on employment • One mentions women but no separate targets (75% employment rate “for women and men”)
3.Maintaining visibility and legitimation Legitimation of gender equality policy challenged by arguments that • Recession is only a he-cession • Equality is a luxury good • Targeted help for households through means-testing has to replace individual rights under austerity Prospects for success may depend upon • Embeddedness of equality norms in society • Embeddedness of female participation norm in family economy • Whether emergent equality gender ideology has replaced or coexists with conservative gender ideology
4. Preserving the public space Importance of public space for gender equality • Space for alternative society values- (human and social investment) • Alternative to female unpaid domestic labour ( limited evidence of male unpaid domestic labour as substitute) • Source of support for women in comparison to private sector (discriminatory wages, male patterns of working time etc)
Key challenge How to maintain the public space when the government is • shrinking the size • eroding the quality • and blurring boundaries of public/private space- That is, the state may be moving from promoter to underminer of gender equality.
5. Future for gender equality Optimistic scenario • Stalled progress- then back to gradual move upward to equality Pessimisticscenario Critical juncture involving for example: • Reversal of normalisation of adult worker model- pressure on women to return to the home • Generalisation of flexible labour market- equality through levelling down • Increasing variation among women (more inactivity, more flexible, and more effective competition for top jobs) • Reinforcement of country differences (dependent on equality norms) or erosion ( through decreasing scope for welfare state ) Outcome unclear but • progress can no longer be assumed • and reversal of gains likely to be both resisted and uneven.