1 / 21

EUDET: Advancing the International Linear Collider

Dive into the detailed R&D progress and status of the EUDET project towards the International Linear Collider. Learn about the partners, budget allocation, management structure, and latest updates. Access key reports, monitor financial details, and explore collaborations for detector design and physics studies. Stay informed on EUDET developments for futuristic advancements in particle physics.

cherylfrazier
Download Presentation

EUDET: Advancing the International Linear Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EUDET Detector R&D towards the International Linear Collider Status and Plans CdLT SOCLE 2009 Slides from J. Mnich, F. Sefkow, L. Linsen

  2. Introduction to EUDET • EUDET : Detector R&D towards the International Linear Collider • FP6 : Integrated Infrastructure Initiative (I3) • Budget: • 21.5 million Euro total • 7.0 million Euro EU contribution Manpower: • ≈ 57 FTE total • ≈ 17 FTE funded by EU • 31 partner institutes in Europe provide own commitments & receive EU funds • 22 associated institutes worldwide contribute to design & construction of infrastructures interested in later exploitation

  3. EUDET Partner Institutes: Charles University Prague IPASCR Prague HIP Helsinki LPC Clermont-Ferrand LPSC Grenoble LPHNE Paris Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau LAL Orsay IReS Strasbourg CEA Saclay DESY Bonn University Freiburg University Hamburg University Mannheim University MPI Munich Rostock University Tel Aviv University INFN Ferrara INFN Milan INFN Pavia INFN Rome NIKHEF Amsterdam AGH Cracow INPPAS Cracow CSIC Santander Lund University CERN Geneva Geneva University Bristol University UCL London + 22 associated institutes

  4. EUDET partners EUDET associates The EUDET Map Novosibirsk Protvino ITEP MPHI MSU Obninsk KEK (Japan) May 2006

  5. Management 4% Networking 9% TA 2% Calorimeter 33% Magnet & Pixel Telescope 18% Tracking 33% EUDET Struture I3 projects based on three pilars (mandatory):

  6. I3 Coordinator F.Sefkow DESY Steering Committee JRA1 Test Beam Infrastruture I.-M. Gregor DESY JRA2 Tracking Detectors J. Timmermans NIKHEF JRA3 Calorimeter Ch. de la Taille LAL Orsay NA2 Detector R&D Network K. Desch Bonn EUDET Management [F. Sefkow] EU as of August 31st Bernard Salanon ↔ Hugues Crutzen External Scientific Advisory Board Ph. Burrows D. Karlen Th. Müller L. Rolandi T. Takeshita European members form Selection Board for TA

  7. Steering Committee • Bi-weekly telephone meetings • including short minutes accesible on (protected) EUDET web page • Preparation of Annual Meeting • Approval of reports • Agenda of EUDET meetings • INDICO category created athttp://ilcagenda.cern.ch/ → Detector Design & Physics Studies → Detector R&D collaborations or go directly to http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=85 • Should be used for all EUDET related meetings • e.g. the Annual Meeting • or JRA meetings to have all agendas, talks, documents etc. at one place

  8. Mid-term Review On 08.04.2009 EUDET has successfully passed the Mid Term Review. All activities provided overview slides on the following requested items: • role of each partner • summary of main achievements to date • dissemination of knowledge • description of work until the end of EUDET The full agenda of the meeting and all presentations on the project can be found on eudet.org under EUDET/Internal

  9. Some citation from the evaluation report to Mid-term Review

  10. Paperwork • Form C • Time sheets • Milestones => report • Deliverables => report • annual report (one more) • Excell sheets…

  11. EUDET Reports and Memos • For internal communication and dissemination of knowledge • EUDET Memo: not refereed, for internal communication • EUDET Report: to be agreed by people involved and the SC for papers, conference proceedings, etc. • See web page for more info, templates and examples • Total Statistic for 2006-2009:

  12. Annual Report 2008 • Short history: 18.02: Submitting of the Annual Report with 3-days delay Unfortunately the set we sent was not final due to the non-final financial information from CNRS 03.03: Obtaining of preliminary assessment of the financial report 23.03: Submitting of revised as well finalized version of AR 08.04: Second assessment from Brussels 04.05: it has been pointed out that UHEI shall provide audit certificate to prove the incurred costs in 2008. *Audit on another EU contract in Heidelberg has given findings which are of systematic nature and it leads to consistency check over all other EU contracts* This issue has been solved in June: UHEI provided audit certificate and showed that the findings are not applicable to EUDET 06.07: now CSIC shall provide audit certificate to prove the incurred costs in 2008. The discussions between CSIC administration and the Commission's services are still ongoing….The costs from CSIC has been set to 0,00 EURO while the situation remains unclear 31.07: CNRS provided already now the financial statement for the first semester of 2009. 08.09: DESY obtained 4th Installment and on 15.09 it has been transferred to the partners

  13. 4th Installment, transferred to the partners on 15.09.2009 Underspending

  14. Conclusion • EUDET = good project • well focused (ILC) • well funded (7 M€ EU money = 50% total) • reasonable size (31 partners) • bureaucracy tolerable • appearing as CNRS added a lot of complication • overall consolidation : wait for last input • shuttle between IN2P3 and DRs • no power over administration • FP7 more complex • new rules • many more partners and projects

More Related