1 / 38

Census 2000: Growing Together or Apart? California’s Regions

Census 2000: Growing Together or Apart? California’s Regions. Hans Johnson Public Policy Institute of California johnson@ppic.org. Outline. The California Context Regional Population Trends Characteristics of the Population. California Population 1900-2000 (in thousands).

chester-gilliam
Download Presentation

Census 2000: Growing Together or Apart? California’s Regions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Census 2000: Growing Together or Apart? California’s Regions Hans JohnsonPublic Policy Institute of California johnson@ppic.org

  2. Outline • The California Context • Regional Population Trends • Characteristics of the Population

  3. California Population 1900-2000(in thousands) Source: US Census Bureau, California Department of Finance

  4. Comparisons of Population Change1950=100

  5. Comparisons of Population Change1950=100

  6. Comparisons of Population Change1950=100

  7. California Population by Race/Ethnicity1970-2000 Source: United States Census Bureau

  8. Percent Foreign Born 1900-2000

  9. Latin America is the Leading Source of Immigrants Latin America 4,697,000 (55%) Asia 2,915,000 (34%) Europe 655,000 ( 8%) Northern America 129,000 Africa 107,000 Oceania 68,000 Source: 2000 Census Supplemental Survey

  10. Immigrants Come to California from Dozens of Countries MEXICO PHILIPPINES VIETNAM EL SALVADOR CHINA INDIA GUATEMALA TAIWAN CANADA KOREA IRAN JAPAN GERMANY HONG KONG ENGLAND SOUTH KOREA PAKISTAN NICARAGUA HONDURAS THAILAND LAOS ARMENIA RUSSIA CAMBODIA FRANCE PERU UKRAINE BRAZIL U.K. AUSTRALIA ARGENTINA MYANMAR CUBA IRAQ ITALY ROMANIA COLOMBIA INDONESIA PORTUGAL EGYPT TURKEY LEBANON ISRAEL NIGERIA POLAND GREECE SCOTLAND SOUTH AFRICA NETHERLANDS COSTA RICA IRELAND JAMAICA BOSNIA & H. SPAIN BOLIVIA ETHIOPIA PANAMA BELIZE SWEDEN SYRIA ECUADOR CZECH REP. HUNGARY BELARUS CHILE JORDAN FIJI AFGHANISTAN Source: 2000 Census Supplementary Survey

  11. Source of Growth has ChangedAnnual Population Change 1950-2000(in thousands)

  12. Net Migration to California1970-1999 (in thousands) Source: California Department of Finance, unofficial estimates to 1980; Public Policy Institute of California 1980-1993; DOF 1993-1999 with CB for international migration

  13. Domestic Migration is Determined by Economic Conditions

  14. Projections for California Diverge Widely Total population projections for California 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 DOF 98 CB Preferred CB Alternative BEA UCLA CCSCE Medium CCSCE High Population (000) CCSCE Low

  15. Outline • The California Context • Regional Population Trends • Characteristics of the Population

  16. Defining California Regions: Geographic Building Blocks

  17. Changing Regional Definitions: The Bay Area

  18. Defining California’s Regions: California in Two

  19. Regional Definitions: California Divided by Nine

  20. The View from San Francisco the hinterlands The City

  21. California’s Regions if States:Area and Population

  22. Regional Population Distribution:North and South Maintaining Shares

  23. Regional Population Distribution:Inland Areas Increasing Share

  24. Relatively Slow Growth in Coastal RegionsPercent Change by Decade

  25. Relatively Fast Growth in Inland RegionsPercent Change by Decade 66%

  26. Source of Population Growth in the 1990s:Coastal Regions

  27. Source of Population Growth in the 1990s:Inland Regions

  28. Jobs and Population Growth: Percent Change 1990-2000

  29. Jobs:Population ImbalanceNew Jobs per 1,000 New Residents, 1990-2000

  30. Housing and Population GrowthPercent Change in Housing Units and Population, 1990-2000

  31. Accommodating Population Growth:Percent of Population Growth Accommodated by Existing Housing Units, 1990-2000

  32. Outline • The California Context • Regional Population Trends • Characteristics of the Population

  33. Percent Foreign Born, 2000

  34. Per Capita Income Rankof California Metropolitan Areas San Francisco 1 San Jose 4 Oakland 18 Orange County 25 Santa Cruz-Watsonville 30 Santa Rosa 32 Ventura 58 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria 59 Salinas 68 San Diego 78 Sacramento 92 Los Angeles-Long Beach 100 Vallejo-Fairfield-Napa 122 Yolo (Davis-Woodland) 124 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles 147 Redding 253 Riverside-San Bernardino 272 Modesto 280 Chico-Paradise 284 Stockton-Lodi 285 Fresno 298 Bakersfield 304 Yuba City 305 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville 308 Merced 312

  35. Growing Apart:Regional Per Capita Income Relative to State(100 = State PCI)

More Related