1 / 27

An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards

Explore the current landscape of learning technology specifications and standards, their benefits, lifecycle, and global implementation. Understand the importance of open standards, interoperability, and the role of organizations in creating a cohesive learning technology ecosystem.

chestern
Download Presentation

An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards Bill Olivier Director, CETIS

  2. Learning Technology Standards • Benefits • Who is doing what globally & in the UK? • What is a specification? What is its lifecycle? • What stage are current specifications and standards at? • De facto & De Jure standards • Supporting actions

  3. Why? • The Internet is founded on open standards • The Web is also based on the open standards that build on Internet standards • Learning Technology is creating open standards that build on Web and other Internet standards • It is now very hard to see any Internet application for widespread use that is not built on open standards • iLearning is too big for any one company to build alone - interoperability between systems from many sources

  4. Why? iLearning Standards • The Internet is based on open standards • The Web is based on Internet standards • Learning Technology is creating open standards based on the Web • Any widespread Internet application will be built on open standards • iLearning is too big for any one company to build alone - need interoperability between systems from many sources Web & other Standards Internet Standards

  5. What for? Front of House: CONTENT • Content Vendors want: their content to run on all platforms • Platform vendors want: all content to run on their system • End users want: their content of choice to run on their platform of choice Back of House: SYSTEMS INTEGRATION • Managed Learning Environments will have many parts • Bespoke systems integration is expensive and inflexible

  6. What for? Open standards aim for: • Portable learning activities and content • Big savings when moving content • Reusable learning activities and content • Productions costs offset over many more uses • Plug & play modular systems • Big savings in systems integration costs • Adaptable systems that are easy to change and evolve • They also help build & maintain a bigger open market • essential in a young field like learning technology

  7. Technology, Pedagogy & Organisations create an evolving system Organisation Pedagogy Learning Technology Specifications Learning Technology

  8. Search & Retrieve LearningDesign Learning Activity Design Metadata Tagging SCORM, Simple Sequencing Content Packaging Content Management / Digital Repository Publish Content Packaging Search & Retrieve Learning Activities Learning Design Co-ordination Course Catalogue Student Record System • Learning Development • Curriculum • Courses • Modules Content/ Sequencing SCORM, Simple Sequencing Enrolments Learning Set-up Results ISO Collaborative Learning Collaboration Assessment QTI Results Enterprise Options Enrolment LIP Unmet Demand Outcomes LIP Transcript NegotiationofLearning Learner Record - Transcript - PDR Aspirations Existing Knowledge LIP Lifelong Learner: Personal Development Planning HTML, XHTML, XML PNG, SVG, SMIL JPEG, MPEG Digital Repositories Metadata Content Authoring Content Packaging Metadata Test Authoring QTI VLE/Services Enterprise Key System /Activity Process/ Potential System Data Flow, Transaction Specification Used

  9. Who is doing what globally? Creating Specifications • AICC (Aircraft Industry CBT Consortium) • IMS (No Longer: Instructional Management System!) • CEN/ISSS (Centre Europeen de Normalisation) Creating Standards • IEEE LTSC (Learning Technology Standards Committee) • ISO SC36 (International Standards Organisation) (Standards Committee 36)BSI (British Standards Institution) IST 43

  10. Who is doing what in the UK? Working with Learning technology Specifications US • ADL for the US DoD – SCORM • (Shareable Content Object Reference Model) UK • JISC – CETIS for F/HE sectors • UfI • BECTa – NlN materials • SUfI • UKeU

  11. ADL Functions (provides a model for supporting other specifications): • Gather requirements from its constituency • Provide a Reference Model for US DoD web-based training • Reference model integrates specifications & standards • Provide an Open Source reference implementation • Support implementers, mainly via Plugfests • Feedback problems & suggest changes to spec bodies • Gather new requirements from vendors and constituency

  12. CETIS Acts as a 2-way link between F/HE & standards bodies Functions: • Gather requirements from its constituency • Develop application profiles with users and vendors • VLE-MIS, ISR/ILR, Dearing Learner Record (Transcript & PDR), Metadata • Support implementers via JISC Programmes & Plugfests • Feedback problems & suggest changes to spec bodies • Support specialist users via SIGs • Support more general users via Fora • Gather new requirements from vendors and constituency

  13. CETIS SIGs Special Interest Groups • Main Link with F/HE community • Disseminate information re existing and forthcoming specs • Gather requirements expert views and opinions • Learn from experience of implementing and using specs • Mutual support & problem solving • Develop and share good practice 5 SIGs and 3 Fora • Accessibility, Assessment ,Educational Content, Learner Information and Profiles, Metadata • FE Focus Group, Pedagogy, MLE (Managed Learning Environment)

  14. Two Questions • What is the lifecycle of a specification? • Which stage have particular specifications reached? • The answers to these are critical to the issue of Government mandation or recommendation of specifications

  15. Implement Systems LT Specs R & D Multiply-Sourced Systems & Content used for Learning “Content” Creation & Exchange New Needs Spec Lifecycle Stages Needs

  16. Standardisation Interoperable Systems & Content Testing Plugfests New Needs Tasks over a spec lifecycle Tasks Define: Application Profiles Achieve: Interoperability Support Specialist Users EstablishGood Practice Support Effective General Use Identify Needs & Develop Prototype Specs Input Needs Experience & Expertise Stages Needs Multiply-Sourced Systems & Content used for Learning Implement Systems “Content” Creation & Exchange LT Specs R & D

  17. New Needs Key Players over a spec lifecycle Practitioners Academic,Open Source & Commercial Developers Education & Training Providers Domain Experts & Leading Edge Developers Domain & Technical Experts Specialist Users Tasks Define: Application Profiles Achieve: Interoperability Support Specialist Users EstablishGood Practice Support Effective General Use Identify Needs & Develop Prototype Specs Input Needs Experience & Expertise Stages Interoperable Systems & Content Needs Testing Plugfests Multiply-Sourced Systems & Content used for Learning Implement Systems “Content” Creation & Exchange LT Specs R & D

  18. Develop Application Profiles Implement Systems LT Specs R & D Multiply-Sourced Systems & Content used for Learning “Content” Creation & Exchange New Needs Spec Lifecycle Stages Needs

  19. Application Profiles • A variant of a specification • Adapted to meet particular needs • of a (large) organisation, sector, country, the EU, etc. • Needs have to be identified & requirements specified • Types • Proper subset – simplified as not all needed • More optional fields made mandatory – increases interoperability • Some mandatory fields made optional • Extended: some new fields added • First two still compliant with original specification • Last two can produce content that is not compliant with original specification

  20. Application Profiles Still needs the same processes as a Specification • Identification of needs & specification of requirements • Changes to be made then have to be agreed between: • The user community (who, why, what, when, where) • The software developers / vendors (how) • Documentation produced • Implementation in systems • Plugfests and other tasks to establish interoperability • Development of test suites • Testing Service • Adoption and development of best practice

  21. Multiply-Sourced Systems & Content used for Learning Implement Systems “Content” Creation & Exchange LT Specs R & D

  22. What does an LT specification look like? IMS specifications have usually had three parts: • Information Model • Binding – so far all have been XML bindings • Best Practice Guide (Implementation) Increasingly will also see: • Behavioural Model • Service Interface / Transactions / Protocols+ bindings XML-based

  23. De facto & de jure: must work, provide benefits & evolve • De facto standards are those adopted by the market • May be proprietary – set by the market ‘gorilla’ • Internet: usually set by an open body with many participants • De jure are those set by a (large) purchasere.g. Government / Govt. Department / large corporation • Conditions for setting a de jure standard: • MUST provide interoperability in practice • MUST enable the exchanges needed to carry out wor • MUST be able to evolve and respond to: • Changing world • Changing technology • Better ways of doing things

  24. Needs, Processes, Use cases, Specifications & Application Profiles • Specifications must meet interoperability needs • What trying to do? • What human-level purposes? • How is task divided between humans and technology? • What do users want the ICT systems to do? (Use Cases) • What systems are involved? • What needs to be exchanged between them? • How are they to communicate this information? • Globally applicable = LT Specifications & Standards • Locally applicable = Application Profiles

  25. Supporting Actions • Gathering interoperability requirements • Translation into Specifications & Application Profiles • Open Source Reference Implementations • Developer support • Working to achieve interoperability • Access to ‘gold’ examples, plugfests, agreed interpretations, Spec revisions, implementation notes • Development of Test Suites and Testing service • eLearning strategist, manager and specialist users support

  26. Creation, implementation and effective use of specifications • social not just a technical or even a domain issue • need agreements at each level • linked set of communities of practice • CoPs complement specification and standards bodies (standards bodies a cross between CoPs & work teams)

  27. More Information CETIS web site: • Introductory and background material • Information on who does what • News and forthcoming events • Features • Links to sites others involved and to other sources • SIG pages: extensive information on particular specifications http://www.cetis.ac.uk

More Related