270 likes | 442 Views
An integrated teaching approach to encourage student-centred learning. Marion Birch & Niels Walet School of Physics and Astronomy The University of Manchester. 1. Dynamics. Core module, 1 st semester 230-280 students – Mechanics ‘A’ level modules 0- 4
E N D
An integrated teaching approach to encourage student-centred learning Marion Birch & NielsWalet School of Physics and Astronomy The University of Manchester 1
Dynamics • Core module, 1st semester • 230-280 students – Mechanics ‘A’ level modules 0- 4 • Classical Newtonian Mechanics • Prior to 2006- 07 - traditional 2 x 1hr lectures /week - poor exam results - mediocre student feedback 2
Innovative Techniques • Just-in-Time Teaching • E- learning • E- assessment • Peer instruction 2
Objectives • To encourage the students to take responsibility for their own learning • To change the students’ attitude to learning • To provide a much more student-centred approach • To instil a deeper conceptual understanding • To increase students’ engagement with the material • To enhance exam performance 3
What is Just-in-Time Teaching? • Developed in the States • Content decided at last minute • Determined by what the students are struggling with • Electronic assignment – submitted a few hours before the lecture 4
Role of online assignment • Must be quick and easy to deliver and analyse • Should give a rich source of feedback as students are progressing through the material • Should allow for real tests of mathematical approach to the material • Must be able to pick up common mistakes easily 4
Available technology • When we started very limited • We use MIT-developed commercial product: MasteringPhysics ( Pearson) (developed as CyberTutor by Pritchard et al) • Alternatives: mathematical products • Stack • Webwork • MapleTA • And maybe one or two more • Need computer algebra ability • Not so easy to author/verify 4
Successes Initial Outcomes Better exam performance 95% submission of on-line assignments Favourable feedback re’ talklets 13
Pitfalls Initial Outcomes Did not meet with students’ expectations Disappointing feedback –resistance to on-line learning cf. lectures Reduction in attendance at lectures On-line assignments not very popular (cf MIT-hate subject!) JIRP sessions poorly attended 14
Current version • Overview lecture - 2hrs - interactive – Peer Instruction • Pre-lecture reading • Hints added to Mastering Physics problems, notation changed; • Optimised feedback • 4 JIRP groups – always new problems • Better management of students’ expectations 15
Attitudes • Appreciation of e-assessment • Students want more! • So what have we done • And what lessons can we learn about analysing assignments 29
So what about e-assessment • Started from question bank • By now re-authored every single question • All with feedback • Some with less hints, most with more • So how does one make the decission? • Any lessons to learn
Quality control • Initially the results were not as good are regards to feedback • Typos in question bank questions.... • Analysis of every question was needed • Feedback needed to be added to all questions, and removed(!) when too trivial • Substantial job (~40 hours first two years)
Lessons • E-assessment requires good analysis tools (e.g, blackboard just starting) • “Fancy” e-assessment needs better analysis tools (e.g., categories of wrong answers) • Algebraic assessments require even better tools; need statistics, grouping, etc. • So do real tools provide this? • MapleTA, Stack, MasteringPhysics, ... All to some level
Conclusions 1 • Good E-assessment requires real quality control • Often not discussed, and rather ad-hoc • It should be designed into the teaching review cycle • It is important for “normal” questions, but crucial for more exceptional styles • Must influence design of VLEs and E-assement engines.
Conclusions 2 • Satisfaction requires good feedback • And support! • Good hints are what is necessary and sufficient for a large fraction of the students • Too many hints -> clicking through • Not enough hints, or insufficient feedback for wrong answers-> problems!
Examination Marks Distributions 2007 - 08 2005 - 06 30