Perkins Title I (postsecondary) & Title II (PCCS) Regional Grant Meetings

1. FY 2010 PerkinsTitle I (postsecondary)& Title II (PCCS) Regional Grant Meetings

2. Meeting Agenda • Overview of FY 2010 Grant Guidelines • Review • plan requirements, changes, submission dates, budgeting • Program of Study Update • Partnership Agreements • Samples, discussion • Other Issues • Dual Credit Quality Act • FY10 Fiscal Monitoring Visits

3. Overview of FY 2010 Grant Guidelines • Perkins Title I, Postsecondary • Perkins Title II, Partnerships for College and Career Success

4. Grant Plan Components

5. Grant Plan Due Dates

6. Program Elements

7. Program Elements • Perkins Title I, Postsecondary • Additions and changes consistent with the Plan Addendum Requirements • distributed in FY09 • Perkins Title II, Partnerships for College and Career Success • No changes to PCCS Components

8. PCCS Components – Attachment 2 (page 9)

9. Perkins Postsecondary Program Elements – Section 2.2.A (pages 4-7)

10. Perkins Postsecondary Program Elements – Section 2.2.A (pages 4-7)

11. Perkins Postsecondary Program Elements – Section 2.2.A (pages 4-7)

13. Program Elements/Component Worksheets • Perkins Element / Partnership Component • Which Element / Component is being addressed? • Resources • How much money is being allocated to this task, and from where? • Must be listed as dollars, with their sources • (Foundation grant, WIA, institutional  funds, etc) • Activity • Briefly describe the specific activity that will address the element/component. • Must start with an action verb • provide, host, evaluate, identify, etc

14. Program Elements/Component Worksheets • Output • What – if anything – will be produced as a result of this activity? • Should be a product of the activity • there may not necessarily be one for each activity • Performance Measure • Which of the Performance Measures will be impacted by this activity? • Perkins: Postsecondary Perkins • PCCS: secondary, postsecondary and PCCS Indicators • One activity can impact multiple measures

15. Program Elements/Component Worksheets • Expected Outcomes • are specific, long-term/short-term measurable results that address the direct and indirect effects of an activity • reflect results, not process • are written as change statements, indicating whether things will increase, decrease or stay the same • things that can be quantified • Increase the “numbers of . . . .” • not increase “awareness of . . .” • describe what will be different as a result of the activity • for the students, teachers, business partners, college, school, etc.

16. Program Elements/Component Worksheets • Expected Outcomes • are directly influenced by - or caused to happen - by the activity • are realistic and achievable • are reflective of the scope of the activity • serve the same population • clearly impact one or more of the Performance Measures.

17. Local Program of Study Inventory

18. Local Program of Study Inventory • Perkins - Appendix J (page 29) • PCCS - Attachment 6 (page 27)

19. Local Program of Study Inventory

20. Overview of FY 2010 Budgeting

22. Overview of FY 2010 Budgeting

23. Overview of FY 2010 Budget Modifications

24. Overview of FY 2010 Budget Modifications • Requests should be made by the project director • Must include: • a revised budget worksheet • Response to the following questions (to justify the need for an amendment) • What was the original intent for the funds? • Why are the funds no longer being used for this purpose? • What is the new intended purpose for the funds?

25. Overview of FY 2010 Budget Modifications

26. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update

27. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update • Programs of Study • sequences of courses that incorporate a non-duplicative progression of secondary and postsecondary elements • include rigorous academic and CTE content, • aligned curriculum • lead to the attainment of an industry recognized credential, certificate, or degree

28. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update • Programs of Study allow students to get more involved and perform better in school by combining rigorous academics with career education so that students have a clear path to their future. • Students who understand the relevance of what they are learning, and how it aligns to their educational and occupational goals, achieve greater success in high school and beyond.

29. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update • Two Parallel Initiatives • State-Level Pathway Development • Local Program of Study Development

30. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update • Two Parallel Initiatives • State-Level Pathway Development • Based on specific statewide economic and workforce development needs • Cluster Teams formed to develop Cluster-Level Knowledge & Skills (K&S) Statements • Pathway Development Teams (PDTs) formed to develop Pathway-Level K&S and supporting materials • Materials developed are shared with PCCS, EFEs and community colleges to provide the foundation of a review of existing programs

31. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update • Two Parallel Initiatives • Local Program of Study Development • PCCS charged with bringing stakeholders together to build local POS that address local workforce/economic development needs • Secondary Schools • community colleges • EFEs • Business, industry and labor partners • Universities • POS builds upon past CTE and/or Tech Prep sequences • Infuses other information available, including Career Cluster

32. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update Where we are now . . . • CURRENT PROJECTS • Health Science Cluster – Therapeutic Services Pathway • John A Logan with Connect SI • College of DuPage with The Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council • Manufacturing Cluster - Production Pathway and Production Process Development Pathway • Illinois Central College

33. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update Where we are now . . . • NEW PROJECTS • Health Sciences Pathway Development Teams • Diagnostic Services • Health Informatics • Biotechnology Research and Development

34. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update Where we are now . . . • NEW PROJECTS • Manufacturing Pathway Development Teams • Maintenance, Installation, and Repair • Quality Assurance • Logistics and Inventory Control • Health, Safety, and Environmental Assurance

35. Overview of FY 2010 Programs of Study Update Where we are now . . . • PROJECTS IN DEVELOPMENT • Information Technology PDTs • Transportation, Distribution and Logistics PDTs • Applications have been received • ICCB and ISBE staff are coordinating the review process

36. Overview of FY 2010 Partnership Agreements

37. Overview of FY 2010 Partnership Agreements • Partnership agreements should include: • The roles and responsibilities of the Partnership members • How decisions are made • Especially big decisions, like annual plan elements and budgeting • How conflicts/disagreements will be resolved

38. Overview of FY 2010 Partnership Agreements • Partnership agreements should include: • Data Sharing language indicating that. . . • Sharing directory information is permissible under FERPA.  • Efforts to collaborate and share data with regional partners is beneficial in helping students transition to postsecondary education.

39. Overview of FY 2010 Partnership Agreements • “Schools may disclose, without consent, ‘directory’ information such as a student's name, address, telephone number, date and place of birth, honors and awards, and dates of attendance. However, schools must tell parents and eligible students about directory information and allow parents and eligible students a reasonable amount of time to request that the school not disclose directory information about them. Schools must notify parents and eligible students annually of their rights under FERPA. The actual means of notification (special letter, inclusion in a PTA bulletin, student handbook, or newspaper article) is left to the discretion of each school.” http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html

40. Overview of FY 2010 Dual Credit Quality Act • Higher Education – Dual Credit Quality Act • HB 1079

41. Overview of FY 2010 Dual Credit Quality Act • Purpose: • reduce college costs • speed time to degree completion • improve curriculum for high school students by aligning it with college and workplace expectations • facilitate the transition between high school and college • enhance communication between high schools and colleges • To offer opportunities for improving degree attainment for underserved populations

42. Overview of FY 2010 Dual Credit Quality Act • Highlights: • all institutions must adhere to standards when offering dc • Standards based off ICCB Admin Rules and NACEP Standards (www.nacep.org) • ICCB is responsible for oversight of community college dc programs • IBHE is responsible for oversight of other higher ed dc programs

43. Overview of FY 2010 Dual Credit Quality Act • Status: • House sponsors, Rep. Roger Eddy, et. al. • Passed the House on 3/18 • 116 – 0 • Sent to the Senate, first Senate reading on 3/19 • Senate sponsors, Sens. Deanna Demuzio and Edward Maloney • Referred to Assignments

44. Overview of FY 2010 FY10 Fiscal Monitoring Visits

45. Overview of FY 2010 FY10 Fiscal Monitoring Visits

46. Questions????

47. Rob Kerr Director of Career and Technical Education Illinois Community College Board (217) 785-0068 Rob.kerr@illinois.gov FY 2010 PerkinsTitle I (postsecondary)& Title II (PCCS) Regional Grant Meetings