1 / 8

Federal Monitoring Quality Assurance Visits

Federal Monitoring Quality Assurance Visits. March 1, 2011. Trev Hall and Erica Burrin. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Process. Oakridge National Laboratory is the responsible party that oversees the QA contractor, Institute for Building Technology and Safety (IBTS)

chidi
Download Presentation

Federal Monitoring Quality Assurance Visits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Monitoring Quality Assurance Visits March 1, 2011 Trev Hall and Erica Burrin

  2. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Process • Oakridge National Laboratory is the responsible party that oversees the QA contractor, Institute for Building Technology and Safety (IBTS) • IBTS will conduct both file reviews and quality assurance visits at homes completed using ARRA funds

  3. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Process • QA visits will include the following activities at the subgrantee’s office and various work sites: 1. Examining of a representative sample of client work files based on weatherized homes reported or planned to be reported by the subgrantee during the ARRA period 2. Scheduling of site visits to a representative sample of completed homes 3. Visiting a representative sample of homes reported as completed by the subgrantee.

  4. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Process • Observations made and recorded by IBTS may include: 1. Completeness of client files 2. Measures called for on a work order as compared to measures installed 3. Documentation of a completed final inspection by the subgrantee 4. Measures billed to the WAP program for labor and material costs versus measures installed on units 5. Quality of workmanship/adherence to state field guides

  5. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Protocols • Communication Process • File Collection • Scheduling Site Visits

  6. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor • How will DOE use the information from the QA contractor? 1. Database Creation 2. Project Officer Review 3. National Data Trends

  7. Quality Assurance (QA) Contractor Process • Review of What We Just learned… • Many more QA Visits to all subgrantees • Even more focus on client files • Increasing attention to health and safety • New monitoring questions • More opportunity for Project Officer Review

  8. Federal & State Monitoring • What to do next? • Great opportunity to shine or not… • Take a deep breath • Ramp up internal monitoring and file review • Ask questions and learn from each other • Monitoring & File Review Skit • Players • One Project Officer • One Unorganized State Weatherization Manager • One Transformed State Weatherization Manager • One Local Weatherization Program Manager

More Related