570 likes | 632 Views
SOC4044 Sociological Theory: Herbert Spencer. Herbert Spencer. References Coser, Lewis A. 1977. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context . 2d ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
E N D
SOC4044 Sociological Theory:Herbert Spencer ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer References Coser, Lewis A. 1977. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. 2d ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Keb, Julia Ann. 1999. “Herbert Spencer: Social Darwinism in Education.” Retrieved October 6, 1999 (http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/spencer.html). Mooney, Linda A., David Knox, and Caroline Schacht. 1997. Understanding Social Problems. New York: West Publishing Company. Peel, J. D. Y. 1974. “Spencer and the Neo-evolutionists.“ Pp. 188-209 in Theories and Paradigms in Contemporary Sociology. Edited by R. Serge Denisfoff, Orel Callahan, and Mark H. Levine. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Incorporated. Perdue, William D. 1986. Sociological Theory: Explanation, Paradigm, and Ideology. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company. Spencer, Herbert. [1850] 1888. Social Statics: or, the Condition Essential to Human Happiness Specified and the First of Them Developed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Spencer, Herbert. [1873] 1961. The Study of Sociology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Spencer, Herbert. 1897. The Principles of Sociology, Part VIII. Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books. Turner, Jonathan H. 1998. The Structure of Sociological Theory. 6th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Turner, Jonathan H., Leonard Beeghley, and Charles H. Powers. 1998. The Emergence of Sociology Theory. 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Wang, Bee Lan C. 1985. “Population and Hunger.” Pp. 284-295 in Social Problems: Christian Perspectives. Edited by Charles P. DeSanto and Margaret M. Poloma. Winston-Salem, NC: Hunter Textbooks, Incorporated. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer 1820 - 1903 ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Born April 27, 1820 in Derby, England • Located in the heart of British industry • Oldest of nine children, the only to survive • Religious/political/philosophical background • Nonconformist Dissenters • Partial Quaker in thinking • Supported laissez-faire economics (Coser 1977:102-103; Perdue 1986:56) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Taught at home by his father and later his uncle • Education--heavy in science--very light in Latin, Greek, English, and History • By age 16 he had a good background in mathematics and the natural sciences • Never would become a generally educated individual ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • In 1837 (at the age of 17) he became an engineer at London and Birmingham Railroad • Later he worked as a draftsman for the Birmingham Railway • Discharged in 1841---he returned home to Derby ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Next few years published several articles in the radical press • “The Proper Sphere of Government” • Argued for an extreme restriction of the scope of government • The whole field of human activity (except for policing) should be left to private enterprise • There are no poor laws, no national education, no established church, no restrictions on commerce, and no factory legislation ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • In 1850, he finished his first book, Social Statics • Based on the theme in “The Proper Sphere of Government” • Creed of laissez faire • His work was in disagreement with Comte in the area of “intervention.” Comte visualized that a “social priest” (with governmental powers) would fine tune society so that society would run as smoothly as possible. • Similar to the role of the chairperson of the Federal Reserve (in the United States) in fine tuning the economy via changing interest rates. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer The basic argument of Social Statics can be stated as follows: Human happiness can be achieved only when individuals can satisfy their needs and desires without infringing on the rights of others to do the same. (Turner, Beeghley, and Powers 1998:45-46) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Each member of the race. . .must not only be endowed with faculties enabling him to receive the highest enjoyment in the act of living, but must be so constituted that he may obtain full satisfaction for every desire, without diminishing the power of others to obtain like satisfaction: nay, to fulfill the purpose perfectly, must derive pleasure from seeing pleasure in others. (Spencer [1850] 1888:448) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • “The Developmental Hypothesis” • 1852, seven years prior to Darwin’s Origin of Species • Expounded and advocated a theory of evolution ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • In 1853 he received a sizable inheritance from his uncle’s estate • From then on he lived the life of a private scholar • A lifelong bachelor living frugally in various lodgings and rooming houses in London ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Around 1854, Spencer suffered from a nervous illness--at times unable to concentrate, write, or even to read • Attempted to overcome acute insomnia with heavy doses of opium • He eventually retreated from society, became a semi-hermit ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Principles of Biology (several volumes 1864-1867) • Textbook used at Oxford • The Study of Sociology (1873) • Textbook used at Yale University • William Graham Sumner taught Spencerism at Yale • Principles of Psychology (two volumes 1870-1872) • Textbook used at Harvard University ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Throughout his life Spencer refused nearly all honors offered him by universities, the government, or scientific bodies. He had no official position and no university degree. Yet during the last quarter of the century he enjoyed an international reputation and influence almost comparable to that of Charles Darwin. (Coser 1977:107) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Paradigm: Order • Class of Theories: Organicism • Societal Evolution • Social Darwinism (Turner 1998:80) • “Society is akin to a special organism obeying its own laws of ‘progress.’” • Platonic Theme • The natural order of all societies is one of hierarchy. (Perdue 1986:47) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Almost a decade before Darwin published On the Origin of Species, Spencer coined the phrase “survival of the fittest.” • Spencer’s Social Statics [1850] • Spencer had used the phrase earlier when writing articles for newspapers. (Turner 1998:80, 85) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer “. . .Spencer had made the connection between biology and sociology.” (Turner 1998:80) This is a profound statement. A large segment of sociological thought is closely aligned with biology--especially in ecological themes. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Comte had allied sociology with biology, arguing that in the hierarchy of the sciences, sociology would emerge from biology and become the “queen science.” ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer But Spencer did more than make superficial analogies between biological and social bodies, he proclaimed that sociology was to be the study of superorganic organisms--that is, relations among living organisms--and he included more than human organisms in this definitions. (Turner 1998:80) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Survival Similarities in Social and Biological Systems • Production of life-sustaining substances • Reproduction of system parts • Regulation and control of actions by system parts • Distribution of information and materials among system units (Turner 1998:80) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer The sociological concept of progress was elevated by Spencer. The evolution of society involves increasing complexity of social structure and associate culture symbols, and this complexity increases the capacity of the human species to adapt and survive in its environment. (Turner 1998:81) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Evolution, that is, “a change from a state of relatively indefinite, incoherent, homogeneity to at state of relatively definite, coherent, heterogeneity,” was to Spencer that universal process, which explains “. . .those latest changes which we trace in society and the products of social life.” (Coser 1977:89) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Spencer argued, that the evolution of human societies, far from being different from other evolutionary phenomena, is but a special case of a universally applicable natural law. Sociology can become a science only when it is based on the idea of belief in a social order not conforming to natural law, survives.” (Coser 1977:90) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Spencer’s most fruitful use of organic analogies was his notion that with evolutionary growth come changes in any units structure and functions, that increases in size bring in their wake increases in differentiation. (Coser 1977:90) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Evolution-- Unilinear or Multilinear? ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • The earlier Spencer indicated a unilinear model of evolution--a straightforward progressive march. • The mature Spencer indicated that “regression” was possible (influenced by what he saw in England toward the end of the 19th century). (Coser 1977:96-97) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Social progress is not linear but divergent and re-divergent. . .(Spencer 1897:725) It was always Spencer’s view that the true symbol of development was not a chain, but a tree. (Peel 1974:198) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Wave Theory Illustrated by Toffler in The Third Wave (Toffler 1980) Toffler is really a conflict theorist, but one can see traces of “evolutionary” ideas within his work. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Survival of the Fittest • War and complex societies • Interventions into lesser societies (Turner 1998:81) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Refer to Herbert Spencer Handout ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer (Turner, Beeghley, and Powers 1998:58-61) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer War, has an interesting impact upon society. It is one of the few social phenomena that “individualistic” members of a modern society are willing to “sacrifice” self-centerness for the “good” of society as a whole. After all, war is the ultimate social problem. (Per Dr. Bolender 1999) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • The period of World War II was the closest that the United States was to having a socialist-type government. • Individualism was sacrificed for the “good” of the “community.” (Per Dr. Bolender 1999) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer At least for a period of time, members of society are willing to allow “major” efficient changes to be made “overnight.” Also, there are “residual” affects after the war, for example, the GI Bill. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer (Turner, Beeghley, and Powers 1998:62-64) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer (Turner, Beeghley, and Powers 1998:64-68) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer The Contrast Between Militant and Industrial Societies (see handout) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Structural-functionalism focuses on the functions war serves and suggests that war would not exist unless it had positive outcomes for society. . .War has created a world of larger political units. . . from 600,000 around 1,000 BC to less than 200 today. (Mooney, Knox, and Schacht 1997:465-466, 469-470) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Through centuries of warfare, the state (as a large political unit) was created. . . This led to greater stability which led to profound positive social and cultural changes. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Industrialization and technology could not have developed in the small social groups that existed before military action consolidated them into larger states. Thus, war contributed indirectly to the industrialization and technological sophistication that characterized the modern world. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer As societies become more industrialized, their proneness to warfare decreases. . . • Preindustrial nations • Overall mean of 10.6 wars per decade • Industrial nations • Overall mean of 2.7 wars per decade ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer Positive Benefits of War • Creates solidarity • Gives society a common cause to rally around • Increases employment and stimulates the economy • Inspires scientific and technological developments that are useful to civilians • Microwave oven • Internet ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer • Serves to encourage social reform • GI Bill • VA • Health care • Housing ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention Nonintervention and the Survival of the Fittest (Coser 1977:99-101) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention Spencer, the same as Darwin, drew the concept of survival of the fittest from the works of Thomas Robert Malthus. The role of “intervention” is a major/serious philosophical issue in the concept of “pure evolution and nonintervention.” ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention Classical Malthusianism • Thomas Robert Malthus • English economist • Essay on the Principle of Population • First published in 1798 AD (Wang 1985:285-286) ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention • Basic principles of the Malthus’ Theory • Food is essential for the existence of man • “Passion between the sexes” will continue to exist and to result in population growth • Population grows “geometrically” whereas at best food increases only “arithmetically” ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention • Positive checks • Famines • Disease • Wars Given the human propensities to procreate faster than food can be produced, most of mankind is poor most of the time ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
Herbert Spencer:Nonintervention • Preventive checks (moral restraints) • Delayed marriages • Reduced frequency of sex relations within marriage • No premarital or extramarital sex relations Malthus did not think that the effect of “moral restraint” would be significant. Further, he did not approve of the practice of contraception. ©1999-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender