130 likes | 298 Views
I. Acoustic study: Methodology. 5. Data labeling and analysis Formant values were normalized using Watt & Fabricius S- centroid procedure (Watt & Fabricius 2002). I. Acoustic study: Methodology. 5.1. Raw data. I. Acoustic study: Methodology. 5.1. Raw data.
E N D
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5. Data labeling and analysis • Formant values were normalized using Watt & Fabricius S-centroid procedure (Watt & Fabricius 2002).
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.1. Raw data
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.1. Raw data
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.1. Raw data
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.1. Raw data
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.1. Raw data
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization For each speaker: F1, F2 [i] F1, F1 [i] S (F1, F2) F1, F2 [a]
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization For each speaker: • Normalized values: • Normalized_F1_[e] = Observed_F1_[e] /S1 • Normalized_F2_[e] = Observed_F2_[e] /S2 Intra-speaker variation is in both sides of the division; hence, with normalized values, its effects are eliminated.
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization Ex. from one particular speaker: [i] = (0,75, 1,67) [u] = (0,76, 0,59) S (1, 1) [a] = (1,49, 1,08)
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization
I. Acoustic study: Methodology 5.2. Data normalization