1.15k likes | 1.29k Views
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering. Selecting an Appropriate Technique . Potential Applications and Candidate TechniqueTechnical FeasibilityEconomic Analysis. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering. Required data for UBO Candidate Identification:. Pore pressure/gradient plo
E N D
1. Lesson 12 Selecting an Appropriate Technique
Read: UDM Chapter 4
pages 4.1-4.54
2. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Selecting an Appropriate Technique Potential Applications and Candidate Technique
Technical Feasibility
Economic Analysis
3. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Required data for UBO Candidate Identification: Pore pressure/gradient plots
Actual reservoir pore pressure
ROP records
Production rate or reservoir characteristics to calculate/estimate production rate
Core analysis
4. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Required data for UBO Candidate Identification: Formation fluid types
Formation integrity test data
Water/chemical sensitivity
Lost circulation information
Fracture pressure/gradient plot
5. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Required data for UBO Candidate Identification: Sour/Corrosive gas data
Location topography/actual location
Well logs from area wells
Triaxial stress test data on any formation samples
6. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Poor candidates for UBD High permeability coupled with high pore pressure
Unknown reservoir pressure
Discontinuous UBO likely (numerous trips, connections, surveys)
High production rates possible at low drawdown
7. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Poor candidates for UBD Weak rock formations prone to wellbore collapse at high drawdown
Steeply dipping/fractured formation in tectonically active areas
Thick, unstable coal beds
8. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Poor candidates for UBD Young, geo-pressure shale
H2S bearing formations
Multiple reservoirs open with different pressures
Isolated locations with poor supplies
Formation with a high likelihood of corrosion
9. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Good candidates for UBD Pressure depleted formations
Areas prone to differential pressure sticking
Hard rock (dense, low permeability, low porosity)
“Crooked-hole” country and steeply dipping formations
10. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Good candidates for UBD Lost-returns zones
Re-entries and workovers (especially pressure depleted zones)
Zones prone to formation damage
Areas with limited availability of water
11. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Good candidates for UBD Fractured formations
Vugular formations
High permeability formations
Highly variable formations
12. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Good candidates for UBD Once the optimum candidate has been identified, the appropriate technique must be selected, based on much of the same data required to pick the candidate.
13. Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering Candidate Decision Tree