1 / 36

China Resources Enterprise

China Resources Enterprise. ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE STRATEGY. Problem. Recently restructured companies assets Low margins CRE operating margin: 1.5% (2009 FY) Sector average: 3.1% Desire from investors for higher profit margin Acquisitions currently a very important part of CRE’s strategy.

chogan
Download Presentation

China Resources Enterprise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. China Resources Enterprise ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE STRATEGY

  2. Problem • Recently restructured companies assets • Low margins • CRE operating margin: 1.5% (2009 FY) • Sector average: 3.1% • Desire from investors for higher profit margin • Acquisitions currently a very important part of CRE’s strategy

  3. Problem • CRE has yet to improve its margins through an acquisition based strategy • Should CRE continue acquisition based growth strategy or focus on fine-tuning their core business against the risks?

  4. Business-level strategy • Focused differentiation with related linked strategy

  5. Business-level strategy • Focused Geographical market: domestic Chinese market • leverage its strength : good understand of Chinese Market • better serve the segment • local/regional competitors : focus on more narrowly defined competitive segments: offer same source of differentiation at lower price • cannot tap the advantages of using global strategy: increased market size, ROI, economics of scales and learning

  6. Business-level strategy • Differentiation strategy in each business unit

  7. Beer Analysis • Beer - "雪花 Snow“ • SWOT – Strength-Single largest beer brand in Chinese Mainland- Market leader position further consolidated by acquisition of Kingway in Feb 2011- US $40m investment in Technology-Marketing Campaign “The Great Expedition” (“勇闖天涯”)

  8. SWOT –Weakness- Thin profit margin (Chinese: price-sensitive)[$2 per hectoliter, compared with $50 to $80 in Europe and the U.S]

  9. SWOT –Opportunity -focus from supply-driven to demand small bottles like imported beers - enlarge customer group : younger, higher imcome, more urban customers - Chinese robust economy - Chinese twelfth five-year plan

  10. SWOT –Threat- cost of production: raw materials, rent, utilities

  11. Five Forces • Rivalry with existing competitors “Tsingtao”: 15% of domestic market share “Yanjing”: sales volume (5m tons target) lower than “Snow” • Bargaining power of customers High market reputation and strong customer loyalty“The Great Expedition” (“勇闖天涯”) • Bargaining power of suppliers Many breweries in China • Potential Entrants Hard to gain a share in this competitive market • Product Substitutes each brand is different

  12. Retail Analysis • Retail • N0. 1 in the supermarket in the Chinese Mainland • National retailer • Generated 51% of revenues • Acquired a hypermarket chain in northern, north-western, north-eastern and central China • multi-format retailer and operates supermarkets, hypermarkets and convenience stores • Vanguard, Suguo, Ole, Vango, CR Care, VivoPlus, Voi_la!, Chinese Arts and Crafts

  13. Retail Analysis • Five Forces • Rivalry with existing competitors Multinational retailers such as Wal-mart, Tesco, Carrefour expand their operations in second and third tier cities They are expected to open 12-20 new stores each year according to PwC • Bargaining power of customers  switching cost is moderate and is decreasing with growing experience in the market

  14. Retail Analysis • Bargaining power of suppliers rather low for small suppliers such as small farming businesses  higher for international brands like P&G as they have international brand awareness • Potential Entrants High cost to entry due to the need to set up new distribution channels  Competitors may retaliate with price war or bad publicity • Product Substitutes Retailing could be bypassed by internet shopping therefore eliminating hypermarkets and supermarkets  Traditional stores offering human contact are an alternative

  15. Beverage Analysis • C’estbon • C’estbon means ‘it is good’ in French • 3 product lines: purified water, mineral water and nutrition fruit juice • Bottled water is famous for its safety  Enjoys a leading position in Guangdong province • Fruit juice ‘O PA’ is the first stress-relieving drink in mainland  Satisfies the need of specific segment of customers

  16. Beverage Analysis • Pacific Coffee • Acquired by CRE in 2010 • Provides great quality coffee and beverages, a comfortable environment and plenty of complementary food choices • Provides addition value by pay attention to every details • Targets customers with higher income

  17. Beverage Analysis • Five Forces • Rivalry with existing competitors “C’estbon”: Master Kong, Wahaha, Coca-Cola and Nestle Pacific Coffee: Starbucks and Gourmet Maste • Bargaining power of customers “C’estbon”: Low Pacific Coffee: High • Bargaining power of suppliers Pacific Coffee: High • Potential Entrants China beverage industry is attractive to the potential entrants • Product Substitutes Carbonated drinks, energy drinks and tea

  18. Food and Processing Distribution Analysis • Ng Fung Hong • vertically integrated high quality meat supply system • control both food quality and food safety from upstream to downstream segments of the supply chain • Value chain system create value to customers • Remain in competitive position

  19. Food and Processing Distribution Analysis • Five Forces • Rivalry with existing competitors strong brand recognition --- raised the reputation • Bargaining power of customers  monopoly in live cattle market in HK  low Bargaining Power of Customers and product substitutes • Potential Entrants monopoly in live cattle market in HK  low Potential Entrances

  20. Food and Processing Distribution Analysis • risk of diluting perceived differentiated features - customer’s dissatisfaction of price increase of beef - price increase is not justified by perceived increase in quality

  21. Business-level strategy • Related linked: SBU Form of Multidivisional Structure - share some resource: distribution channels in different business units

  22. Food and retail • Development of self-owned retail stores and launchedmore than 120 meat counters and stores • Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanning, Shenzhen and Ningbo, etc, • Leveraging the strong “Ng Fung” brand name and efficient supply chain

  23. Acquisition-Based Strategy

  24. Pursuit of Market Power • CRE has potential to further increase market power as a result of their related linked strategy • Proper execution will allow CRE to reduce the costs of its primary and support activities • CRE can further employ vertical integration via vertical acquisitions

  25. Pursuit of Market Power • Vertical Integration • Food, beer and beverage divisions provide inputs for CRE’s retail business segment • CRE can increase their market power using an integrated model • R&D, processing & distributing, storage, wholesaling, retailing • Limitations of vertical integration • Outside supplier may produce the input at a lower cost • Changes in consumer demands create capacity imbalance and coordination problems

  26. Pursuit of Market Power • Horizontal Acquisitions • CRE can integrate its own assets that complement their core competency • Key driver to top-line growth and market share • Ex. Strengthening retail position by acquiring supermarkets • Expand geographical coverage in the northern and central areas of mainland China • Help CRE further establish its network of primary activities • Ex. CRE recent push to acquire breweries in these locations

  27. Learn and Develop New Capabilities • Goal: Develop and exploit economies of scope between CRE’s businesses • Broaden knowledge base and leverage CRE’s core competences • Create value by pursuing Operational and corporate related acquisitions

  28. Learn and Develop New Capabilities • Acquisitions to create operational relatedness • CRE can leverage its existing primary activities • Distribution systems • Sales networks • Also facilitate their support activities • Purchasing practices • Bargaining power • Has potential to improve existing profit margin • Increased revenues • Decreased costs

  29. Learn and Develop New Capabilities • Limitations to acquisitions to further operational relatedness • Organizational integration may fail to create synergies • Success is dependent on CRE’s ability to integrate acquisitions into a cohesive structure that will allow sharing of activities to take place efficiently • Important that HQ implements controls to foster sharing of activities between related divisions

  30. Learn and Develop New Capabilities • Enhancing corporate relatedness through acquisitions • Transferring CRE’s core competences to an acquired business • CRE has expert local market knowledge and a sophisticated distribution system • Transferring core competences of core business to CRE • Possible targets should include companies that can transfer cost saving related core competences to CRE

  31. Learn and Develop New Capabilities • Downside of pursuing a combination operational relatedness and corporate relatedness acquisition based strategy • Cost of organization and compensation structure could be expensive leading to further decrease in CRE’s profit margins

  32. Risks of Acquisition Based Strategy • Integration Challenges • Financial systems • Control systems • Building effective working relationships

  33. Risks of Acquisition Based Strategy • Inability to achieve synergy • Ideally want acquisitions to create economies of scope and share resources to benefit the company • Must focus on rational evaluation of private synergies • Business is worth more managed by CRE than by itself • Transaction costs • Due diligence fees (lawyers, investment banks, accountants, etc) • Managerial time to evaluate target firms, complete transaction • Transaction costs < expected synergies

  34. Risks of Acquisition Based Strategy • Too much diversification • CRE could begin to rely on acquisition activities to replace innovation • Managers may focus solely on financial performance of a business segment rather than strategic controls to evaluate business performance • CRE may be getting to big • Managers may implement more bureaucratic control to manage combined firm’s operations • Hinders innovation

  35. Risks of Acquisition Based Strategy • Managers overly focused on acquisitions • Large managerial cost associated with acquisitions • Searching for viable acquisitions • Completing due diligence process • Preparing for negotiations • Managing the integration process • Diverts attention from other matters that are necessary for long-term competitive success, such as identifying ways to drive cost-efficiencies

  36. Recommendation

More Related