110 likes | 245 Views
Offshore Transmission. Giles Stevens Head of offshore electricity transmission. Contents. Regulatory approach Attracting investment User requirements & commitments A potential scenario. Regulatory approach.
E N D
Offshore Transmission Giles Stevens Head of offshore electricity transmission
Contents • Regulatory approach • Attracting investment • User requirements & commitments • A potential scenario
Regulatory approach • Approach must ensure that sound investment decisions provide the best value to consumers and offshore transmission users • Sound investment decisions require: • Co-ordination • Minimising risk of stranded assets and ‘gold plating’ • To deliver best value to consumers and network users, the regulatory approach must: • Enable necessary investment to deliver economically efficient, fit for purpose, transmission infrastructure • Provide certainty to investors in offshore transmission
Attracting investment 1 • Investors in offshore transmission will need certainty • What risks are private investors exposed to? • Scope • Timing • Development • Construction • Financing • Operation • Returns • Price control can give certainty over: • Regulated asset value • Performance requirement • Returns • Incentive/penalty regime
Attracting investment 2 • The following are likely to be required: • Fair and transparent selection process • Competitive pressure • Independent ownership of offshore transmission assets • No unfair advantage to incumbents • Clear definition of scope of work i.e. technical standards • User commitment from generators • Enduring regulatory structure, including mechanisms for change
User requirements • Capacity • Location • Additional capacity • Performance • Availability • Time to repair • Delivery date
User commitment TO ensure offshore transmission networks are not stranded investments, need: • Commitment from generators for transmission build • Commitment to be in place before transmission investment • Most efficient investment will take place once all generators committed • Scope of transmission work dependent on firm signal from generators
Geographic areas The following options were set out in the scoping document • Single zone Pros Easiest way to allocate Economics of scale • Cons • Scale (£1bn+) likely to deter all but largest players • Less opportunity for competition • ‘Eggs in one basket’ • No comparison/benchmarking possible • Few ( 3 – 5) Pros Reasonable investment scale Economics of scale Opportunity for competition ‘Spread the risk’ • Cons • More complex regime • Needs cooperation from generators • Many (17 zones) Pros Point to point approach Easy to implement • Cons • Few opportunities for economies of sale • More complex regime • Investment may be too small to be attractive
One potential scenario (1) • Geographic areas • 3 or 5 (as projects of £2-500m maybe most attractive to investors) • Security standards • Present standard, single fault etc • Connection requirements • Generator provides up front commitment • Offshore TO responsible for providing most economic and timely connection • Scope • Requirements defined by generators to get least cost solution
One potential scenario (2) • Selection of Offshore TO’s • By competition • Price control • Provides long term RAV certainty • Regular efficiency reviews • Provides detailed arrangements for investment risks to be managed: • Adoption • Changing scope • Offshore TO failure
Promoting choice and value for all gas and electricity customers