1 / 13

Comparison of 2D fields of GENIE data

Comparison of 2D fields of GENIE data. V.Livina, T.Lenton, S.Goswami. Method. Singular value decomposition of 2D matrix M ( ): where & are unitary matrices ( & ), is diagonal matrix of singular values. Efficiency criterion for time series:

cicily
Download Presentation

Comparison of 2D fields of GENIE data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of 2D fields of GENIE data V.Livina, T.Lenton, S.Goswami

  2. Method • Singular value decomposition of 2D matrix M ( ): where & are unitary matrices ( & ), is diagonal matrix of singular values. • Efficiency criterion for time series: Here and are series of singular values (in non-increasing order) • If E=1, two series are identical (point-wise comparison)

  3. Experiment I • GENIE-2, EMBM & C-Goldstein, ‘eb_go_gs’ air temperature over land, 36 x 36 grid • GENIE-1, EMBM & ENTS-land, land temperature, 36 x 36 grid

  4. EMBM temperature over land ENTS land temperature

  5. Singular values and coefficients all SVs: E=0.95 first 10 SVs: E=0.92 first 5 SVs: E=0.85

  6. Experiment II • GENIE-land, ‘ig_fi_fi’, land temperature, 64 x 32 grid (averaged to 32x32) • GENIE-1, EMBM & ENTS-land, land temperature, 36 x 36 grid (cut to 32x32)

  7. GENIE-land, ig_fi_fi land temperature ENTS land temperature

  8. Singular values and coefficients all SVs: E=0.48 first 10 SVs: E=0.26 first 5 SVs: E=-0.08

  9. Comparison of model & real data • If one to compare two model fields, the generalised criterion is applicable • If one to compare model field with the real one, the asymmetric criterion is preferable (real data prioritised)

  10. Generalization to 3D Given 3D field (for instance, (x,y,t) time-evolution of the stream function), one can • apply the method to 2D slices (x,y,i), i=1..N • compile a time series of consequent sets of singular values • then apply the efficiency criterion

  11. Applications • Automated comparison (to check whether E close to 1 without visualisation) • Further detailed analysis of possible discrepancies (which singular values deviate) • Possible generalisations for higher dimensions

  12. Discussion • Introducing weights for singular values? Different distributions have very different sets of singular values! • Ways to compare fields with different grids: truncation, averaging?

  13. Thank you!

More Related