1 / 23

Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC

Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute). Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC. Outline. Damage Studies Merlin Simulations Bench Tests T480@ESA EM Simulation activity Plans. LC-ABD WP5.3 (Nigel Watson)/EUROTeV WP2 (BDS)

cinthiah
Download Presentation

Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute) Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC

  2. Outline • Damage Studies • Merlin Simulations • Bench Tests • T480@ESA • EM Simulation activity • Plans • LC-ABD WP5.3 (Nigel Watson)/EUROTeV WP2 (BDS) • Collimation is crucial for beam delivery and detector protection/performance http://hepunx.rl.ac.uk/swmd/talks/

  3. People • “Spoiler Wakefield and Mechanical Design” task • Details on project web: http://hepunx.rl.ac.uk/swmd/ • Birmingham: N.Watson • CCLRC: C.Beard,G.Ellwood,J.Greenhalgh,J.O'Dell,L.Fernandez • CERN: F.Zimmermann,G.Rumolo,D.Schulte • [DESY: I.Zagorodnov] • Lancaster: D.Burton,N.Shales,J.Smith,A.Sopczak,R.Tucker • Manchester: R.Barlow,A.Bungau,G.Kurevlev,R.Jones,A.Mercer • TEMF, Darmstadt: M.Kärkkäinen,W.Müller,T.Weiland • For ESA tests, working closely with • CCLRC on optics for wakefield and beam damage studies • SLAC Steve Molloy et al. for all aspects

  4. Damage Studies • EGS/Geant4/FLUKA in agreement • ANSYS modelling of temperature flow done. • Shockwave studies underway… • Focus now on manufacturability – wire erosion? • Search for a site to conduct damage tests (CERN? Discussions at EPAC… ) [L.Fernandez, ASTeC] 0.6 Xo of Ti alloy leading taper (gold), graphite (blue), 1 mm thick layer of Ti alloy 0.3 Xo of Ti alloy each side, central graphite part (blue). • L. Fernandez-Hernando, N.K. Watson, EUROTeV-report-2006-015, FLUKA Simulations of Energy Density Deposition from a ILC Bunch in different Spoiler Designs, http://www.eurotev.org/e158/e1365/e1378/e2167/EUROTeV-Report-2006-015.pdf • A. Bungau, R.J. Barlow et al., EUROTeV-Report-2006-021, GEANT4 Simulations of Energy Deposition in ILC Spoilers • L. Fernandez-Hernando et al.¸Shower Simulations, Comparison of FLUKA, GEANT4 and EGS4, Proc. EPAC'06, Jun 2006. • G.Ellwood, R.J.S.Greenhalgh, Beam Impact of the ILC Collimators, Proc. EPAC'06, Jun 2006.

  5. Shockwave studies

  6. Merlin Simulations • Manchester University involved in wakefield simulations of the ILC collimators (R.Barlow, A.Bungau) • Merlin code development (includes higher order modes) • Simulation of bunch kicks for different modes at different offsets EPAC 2006 Paper: “Simulation of High Order Short Range Wakefields” A.Bungau and R. Barlow, The University of Manchester, EUROTeV-2006-051

  7. Plot from S.F.Hill and M.J.Pugh, paper at EPAC'94 Bench “wire method” setup • Calculate impedence of structure • Simulate mode structure • Use where wire is not interfering with the mode, or use simulation results to subtract wire induced effects

  8. 2 doublets Two triplets BPM BPM BPM BPM ~40m ~16m T-480 Experiment Vertical mover • Wakefields measured in running machines: move beam towards fixed collimators • Problem • Beam movement  oscillations • Hard to separate wakefield effect • Solution • Beam fixed, move collimators around beam • Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation • Many ideas for collimator design to test…

  9. 2 doublets Two triplets BPM BPM BPM BPM ~40m ~16m T-480 Experiment Vertical mover • Wakefields measured in running machines: move beam towards fixed collimators • Problem • Beam movement  oscillations • Hard to separate wakefield effect • Solution • Beam fixed, move collimators around beam • Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation • Many ideas for collimator design to test…

  10. ESA beamline layout (plan) Wakefield box Beam • Measure kick factor using incoming/outgoing beam trajectory, scanning collimator gap through beam • Stage 1, 5 rf cavity BPMs, 1 stripline BPM, 2 wire scanners • Downstream BPMs themselves R&D project … • Wakefield box, proposal for 2 sets of four pairs of spoiler jaws • Each set mounted in separate “sandwich” to swap into WF box • (Relatively) rapid change over, in situ – ½ shift for access • Commissioning run, Jan 4-9, 2006 • Physics run, 24-Apr – 8-May, 2006

  11. Wakefield box 1500mm Ebeam=28.5GeV ESA sz ~ 300mm – ILC nominal sy ~ 100mm (Frank/Deepa design) Magnet mover, y range = 1.4mm, precision = 1mm

  12. Successful commisioning and physics runs in 2006 Wakefield box sy = 117 mm Beamline preparation at SLAC - Ray Arnold Wire scanner measurement of vertical spotsize. ESA Test Beam for T-480

  13. 38 mm h=38 mm L=1000 mm a r=1/2 gap As per last set in Sector 2, commissioning Extend last set, smaller r, resistive WF in Cu 7mm cf. same r, tapered

  14. 38 mm 7 mm cf. collim. 4 smaller r h=38 mm cf. collim. 2, same r 211mm 31mm cf. collims. 4 and 6 133mm cf. collim. 7, and same step in/out earlier data

  15. Kick angle/(µrad/mm) Wakefield box position/mm L Fernandez: Collimator 2 run588 Misallignment No of events

  16. 1167 Bunch length ~400 Charge ~1.6E10 L Fernandez: Collimator 8 Some plots not as clear!

  17. Processing also at SLAC

  18. EM Simulations with GdfidL 4 5 2 7 1 6 8 3

  19. Wakefields @300µm (6 cells/sigma) Collimator number Collimator number

  20. Wakefields @500µm (10 cells/sigma) Collimator number Collimator number

  21. GdfidL & TBCI • TEMF working on ECHO/PBCI – 3D, moving mesh, conformal, non-dispersive solver GdfidL σ/Δz=6 PBCI W║(s)/(V/pC) With thanks to Mikko Kärkkäinen s/σ

  22. Next DRAFT • ESA Runs provisionally beg. Feb07, Jul07. • Understand affect of conductivity and finish • Manufacturability studies • Still some simulation tuning • Simulation of new collimator geometry • Analysis fine tuning • Bench tests

  23. Conclusion • EM simulations: • MAFIA • GdfidL • ECHO Now starting second iteration… Bench Tests (scaling?) Prediction of effect at IP (MERLIN) New designs Beam Tests ESA Damage Studies ? Prediction of mechanical properties Analytical Approach (Lancaster Theory Group)

More Related