1 / 15

CONSUMER DEMAND FOR LIQUIDITY 7th set of transparencies for ToCF

CONSUMER DEMAND FOR LIQUIDITY 7th set of transparencies for ToCF. Consumers, like firms, may face liquidity shocks. 3 topics: I. Financial institutions as  liquidity pools : fundamental (no self-provision)

civerson
Download Presentation

CONSUMER DEMAND FOR LIQUIDITY 7th set of transparencies for ToCF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONSUMER DEMAND FOR LIQUIDITY 7th set of transparencies for ToCF

  2. Consumers, like firms, may face liquidity shocks. 3 topics: I. Financial institutions as liquidity pools: fundamental (no self-provision) insurers (flatten term structure to reduce cost of impatience): more fragile! II. Runs III. Heterogenous consumers and security design.

  3. DIAMOND-DYBVIG (1983) - MODEL AND VARIANTS I. Consumer demand:

  4. Technological yield curve Intuitions: hoarding liquidity is costly,  liquidity is wasted if no liquidity shock. Example:  AUTARKY with (no dominance) Technological yield curve: Self-provision of liquidity is inefficient (Strong form: no financial markets at date 1, not only lack of planning at date 0).

  5. Social optimum either or match maturities with consumptions if independent shocks

  6. not optimal to perfectly insure CRRA  1 cu'decreasing  Flattening of the yield curve.

  7. (1) Deposit contract: can withdraw at date 1 or at date 2 IMPLEMENTATION (assume can be verified. See below). (2) Mutual fund invests dividend i1 at date 1. Impatients consume [i1+p] ( p = resale price)

  8. Not true for more general preferences mutual fund equalizes only MRS; more conditions. Patients get

  9. Here: bypass. Invest if patient: if impatient: resell to patient depositors (who then withdraw ). With can buy  (%) of value R  JACKLIN CRITIQUE General theme: markets conflict with optimal insurance. back to technological yield curve DD INSURANCE INCOMPATIBLE WITH EXISTENCE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS TO WHICH AGENTS HAVE ACCESS.

  10. Analogies: insurance against liquidity shocks liquidity costly to create: return on ST investment < return on LT investment need right hoarding + dispatching VARIANTS autarky given strong meaning (no trading of claims in financial markets), incompatibility with financial markets, consumer’s LT claim fully pledgeable. Differences: (a) OLG: could have i1 = 0 (liquidity newcomers) Not IC, though: flat yield curve (b) Macroshocks: Hellwig 1994 on interest rate shocks.  COMPARISON WITH CORPORATE LIQUIDITY DEMAND

  11. RUNS Suppose now withdraw ( is an equilibrium) II. Suppose Preferences : if patient, if impatient (but has access to storage technology 1  1 between dates 1 and 2). receives if withdraws, if does not.

  12. ANTI-RUN POLICIES suspension of convertibility, credit line, LOLR, interbank and other liquidity markets.

  13. HETEROGENEOUS CONSUMER HORIZONS: GORTON - PENNACCHI (1990) (2) random and unobservable ( or ) “Potential liquidity traders” () “LT investors” (1-) III. Consumers have different probabilities of experiencing shock. DD with 3 twists: (1) R uncertain ( or ) not commonly observed at date 1.

  14. To simplify, 2 states (3) Speculator (preferences ) : learns state at date 1, can buy shares. full pooling loss per potential liquidity trader • SUPPOSE ISSUE EQUITY order flow in state L: order flow in state H: = price discount (no such discount if only LT investors buy).

  15. if • DEBT AS A LOW INFORMATION INTENSITY SECURITY Discussion.

More Related