1 / 10

Stationary Sources Joint Forum: Next Steps

This forum discusses the completion of projects, reporting on NOx controls for EGUs, oil and gas emissions inventory, updated list of BART eligible sources, and the development of SO2 and NOx trading alternatives. The forum aims to revisit and justify the 309 Annex for SO2 emissions, develop NOx trading alternatives, provide source-specific BART support, and coordinate next steps.

cjulius
Download Presentation

Stationary Sources Joint Forum: Next Steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stationary Sources Joint Forum:Next Steps December 14, 2005 Eric C. Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

  2. Summary of Project Milestones • Complete projects • Report on NOx Controls for EGUs • Projects expected to be complete by 12/31/05 • Oil and gas emissions inventory • 2002 and 2018 Point and Area Source Emissions Inventory • States and Tribes • Updated list of BART eligible sources • Focus on SO2 and NOx from EGUs • Attention paid to other source categories

  3. Forum Goals • Revisit and rejustify the 309 Annex for SO2 emissions in the 5 states • Develop a SO2 trading alternative for non-309 states and tribes? • Additional states and tribes participate in the Annex program? • Develop a NOx trading alternative for all states and tribes • Provide support for source-specific BART • Technical support • Guidance and coordination

  4. Next Steps • Project milestones form basis for on-going work • Formation of Three Workgroups • Revisions to the SO2 Annex • What are the 309 States contemplating? • Alternatives to BART • EPA’s final rule on alternatives to BART expected • Source-Specific BART • Case-by-case analysis coordination

  5. Revisions to SO2 Annex • Workgroup activities • Evaluate the BART or alternative options once EPA has finalized its rule package • Expand to other tribes and states? • Conduct an analysis of the 309 milestones • Use latest inventory information • Base on 2018 forecasts for: • Electrical Generating Units (EGUs) • Possible/expected BART reductions

  6. Alternatives to BART • Overlap of Annex workgroup participants expected and encouraged • Workgroup activities • Evaluate the options once EPA has finalized its “Alternatives to BART” rule package • Evaluate various 2018 control scenarios for EGUs • Scenario “A”: includes known future controls and presumptive BART limits for NOx and SO2 • Additional scenarios • Example: NOx combustion controls for all EGUs regardless of BART applicability

  7. Alternatives to BART Cont. • Workgroup activities continued • Develop approaches for demonstrating alternative is better than BART • Greater reasonable progress approach • Simplified source-specific BART approach • Identify options of interest for alternative NOx program under 308 • Which tribes and states would interested? • What is industry’s view? • Utility program only, or also include non-utility sources? • Where do we draw the eligibility line? • When do they get phased into the program?

  8. Alternatives to BART Continued • Workgroup activities continued • Participating tribes and states identify non-utility sources for potential control and inclusion • BART sources • Non-BART sources • Greater than 100 TPY sources?

  9. Source-Specific BART • Workgroup activities • Some states moving forward with a case-by-case, source-specific BART analysis • Discuss issues and share information on the approaches being evaluated or implemented • Identify areas where WRAP can assist or help coordinate activities • Modeling protocol requirements • Clearinghouse for BART determinations • Discuss opportunities for Tribes and States to enter trading market after analysis is complete

  10. Workgroup Assistance • Workgroups currently being formed • Member and stakeholder input key to success • Contractor assistance may be necessary to assist with technical aspects • Goals • Priority given to developing consensus • Produce technical and analytical products necessary for the 12/17/07 State and Tribal Implementation Plan deadline.

More Related