1 / 36

Urinary Tract Infections Myths and Reality

Urinary Tract Infections Myths and Reality. Dr Steve Holden Consultant Microbiologist and NUH Lead for Antimicrobial Stewardship. Declaration of interest: Consultancy with Profile Pharma. Dr Annie Joseph

Download Presentation

Urinary Tract Infections Myths and Reality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Urinary Tract InfectionsMyths and Reality Dr Steve Holden Consultant Microbiologist and NUH Lead for Antimicrobial Stewardship Declaration of interest: Consultancy with Profile Pharma Dr Annie Joseph Microbiology Registrar and Co-author of Nottinghamshire Primary Care Antibiotic Guidelines

  2. Session overview • What are the key issues? • UTI diagnosis in the elderly • Laboratory processing of samples • Management of UTIs • Asymptomatic bacteriuria • Local susceptibility data and guidelines • Special circumstances • Future local work

  3. Recent publications • Health & Social Care Act 2008 Code of Practice on the prevention and control of infections • New Criterion 3: antimicrobial stewardship • NICE Antimicrobial Stewardship Guideline (NG15) • Recommendations for prescribers, providers & commissioners • Patient Safety Alert (NHSE, HEEM and PHE) • TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education, Tools)

  4. The Key Issues • Increasing bacterial resistance (locally and globally) • Emergence of pan-resistant coliform bacteria. • Diagnosing UTI in the elderly • Unnecessary treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. • Joined up approach for sending samples, processing and interpretation of results needed. • New guideline on management of UTI.

  5. UTI diagnosis in elderly • Considerations: • Catheterised vs Non-catheterised • Lower vs Upper UTI • Complicated vs Uncomplicated UTI • Structural e.g. obstruction, calculi. • Neurogenic bladder • Diabetes, immunosuppression • Alterative diagnoses

  6. National Guidance: PHE • SIGN:

  7. National Guidance: SIGN

  8. Catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) • Urinalysis and culture positivity not helpful unless symptoms or signs of CAUTI • The following do not predict infection: • Odorous or cloudy urine • Positive dipstick for LE/nitrites; presence of pyuria.

  9. Sample processing overview • Dipstick? • Dipstick screen useful as a negative (but not positive) predictor in those with equivocal symptoms. • Poor evidence to support use of dipsticks in the elderly. • Sample sent to lab for MC&S • All samples have automated microscopy performed by flow cytometry. • Samples flagged by flow cytometer that require culture & sensitivities.

  10. Microscopy and culture • Flow cytometers set up for sensitivity, not specificity • Very high negative predictive value (99% in women) • Positive microscopy indicates need to culture sample. • Negative = immediate result. • Presence of excess epithelial cells indicates poorly obtained sample. • Evaluation for microscopic haematuria should be done by dipstick. • Culture and direct sensitivities now performed giving 24hr result. • Amoxicillin removed from testing • Current agents: co-amoxiclav, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, pivmecillinam, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim and piptazobactam.

  11. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) • Presence of bacteria in the urine without clinical evidence of urinary tract infection • Different from perineal or other contamination i.e. when the bugs cultured were not in the patient’s urine at all. • Presence of pyuria does not indicate infection • Odorous or cloudy urine does not indicate infection • Common in the elderly and catheterised

  12. Source: Infectious Diseases Society of America, CID 2005;40:643-54

  13. ASB: What’s the problem? • Treatment is not indicated. • Does not reduce frequency of symptomatic infection or prevent further episodes of ASB • Contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance; risk of side effects including C.diff. • Number Needed to Harm = 3 • Probably the most significant contributor to inappropriate antimicrobial use. • Therefore looking for it should be avoided. • Exceptions are pregnancy (UK guidance to confirm with second sample) and prior to invasive urologic procedures e.g. TURP

  14. Experience at NUH and elsewhere • Audit on admissions wards at QMC showed >40% of patients treated for UTI actually had ASB. • ED audit showed 15% of patients treated for LE +/- nitrite positive dips with no evidence of infection. • Sample sent “routinely”  clinician reviewing result does not know why sample sent and treats out of caution. • Toronto: 48% of patients with ASB treated unnecessarily vs. 12% after lab withheld antibiotic susceptibility results (CID 2014:58)

  15. Requests and sample labelling • Type of urine e.g. MSU, CSU • Affects processing and reporting • Clinical details: • Difficult or multi-resistant isolates are reviewed by medical microbiologist • We can release certain sensitivities or provide extra interpretative comments. • Many studies estimate over 60% of urine samples are unnecessarily sent for MC&S. • Education of nursing staff and anyone who can send urine samples • “Let’s send it, just in case…..”

  16. Genuine UTI… what to treat with?

  17. Resistance in urinary pathogens • Multiple mechanisms • No longer test or report “ESBLs” as one of many types of betalactam resistance and does not help to know clinically. • Resistance to betalactam agents e.g. co-amoxiclav often accompanied by resistance to certain others e.g. trimethoprim. • Drivers of resistance • Individual patients: Antibiotic exposure over time, broad-spectrum agents with effects on flora, cross-infection in hospital/care facilities. • Global: Injudicious (and valid) use of antimicrobials; international spread. • Concerning emergence of carbapenem-resistant coliforms (CRE). Becoming endemic in certain countries and UK centres. Few or even no therapeutic options.

  18. 20% cut-off for empirical use recommended by IDSA guidelines

  19. Updated UTI guidance June 2015

  20. CAUTI management & prevention • Treatment of CA-UTI and removal of catheter if inserted for >2 weeks. • Treatment duration poorly defined • IDSA suggest 7 days • What doesn’t work: • Antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment of CA-ASB • Adding antimicrobials to catheter drainage bags • Routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis for catheter change

  21. What are the ideal agents? • What do we need? • Low rate of resistance • Unique mode of action • Highly concentrated in the urine • Minimal impact of normal flora • Low rate of allergy, intolerance and contra-indications • Cheap and easily available • Easy to test in the laboratory for sensitivity

  22. Nitrofurantoin • Remains very active against coliforms except Proteus spp. • Concerns about use in elderly / renal impairment • Possible pulmonary and hepatotoxicity • Failure to concentrate in renal tract • MHRA has recently updated guidance: • Avoid if eGFR <45 unless no alternatives (CI if <30) • Not suitable for pyelonephritis or systemic symptoms eg. fever

  23. Pivmecillinam • Betalactam drug • Low rate of resistance – Europe 4.2% resistance • Now testing first line for all urine isolates at NUH • Minimal effect on GI flora • CI in penicillin allergy • Unique mode of action • Highly concentrated in the urine • Cost comparable with nitrofurantoin • Safe in pregnancy and children

  24. Others • Trimethoprim resistance now unacceptably high for empirical use in the elderly • Amoxicillin and co-amoxiclav similar • Major drivers of resistance and C.diff • Cephalosporins • Acceptable resistance rates but again major drivers of resistance • Ciprofloxacin • Surely not…?? • Currently the third line option for empirical therapy and first-line for pyelonephritis

  25. Ciprofloxacin • Highly effective drug for treating most types of UTI • Concerns about selecting MRSA and C.diff • Prevalence of MRSA now very low • Main problem with quinolones is selection of 027 strain (of Stoke Mandeville fame). This is now rarely seen. • Prior to this has been relatively C.diffsparing. • Should not be used empirically for other conditions outside of the guideline indication • However, can also select more resistant coliforms and should be avoided if we can find a more suitable alternative.

  26. Fosfomycin • >90% of multi-resistant coliforms susceptible • Currently unlicensed in UK but widely used in some other European countries • UK licensed product likely by end of 2015 (Profile Pharma) • Single 3g sachet for uncomplicated UTI • Well tolerated • Minimal impact on GI flora • Safe in penicillin allergy • Can be used currently unlicensed to avoid admission • Under microbiology/ID advice (Amber 2 indication) • Available via wholesalers • If likely delay >24hrs then community script to QMC or KMH pharmacy

  27. Unusual problems • Pseudomonas: Genuine uncomplicated infection very rare • Only susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Resistance develops after exposure. Urology referral may be indicated if genuine recurrent infection. • Staphylococcus aureus: Very rare cause of uncomplicated UTI • In a woman could reflect perineal flora • Repeated isolation from male MSU could indicate extra-renal systemic infection with excretion in urine. This is well described and requires investigation. • Common catheter coloniser that may cause ascending infection. MRSA can be troublesome although often trimethoprim susceptible. • Candida spp.: Most likely commensal or thrush but genuine urinary tract infection requires investigation with imaging. Only likely if predisposing factors e.g. severe immunosuppression or renal tract abnormality

  28. Pre-surgical screening • No evidence that this is useful or that treating ASB prior to most surgery including prosthetic joint insertion reduces post-op infection. • Exception is for urological procedures where mucosa will be breached • Risk of ascending infection and sepsis • Use sensitivities to guide peri-op prophylaxis • This should be organised or advised by urologists.

  29. Recurrent UTIs • ≥ 3 symptomatic UTIs in one year • Microbiological confirmation should be obtained prior to considering antibiotic prophylaxis • Indications for referral to Urology (NICE CKS) • Review prophylaxis after 6 months • Evidence for long-term prophylaxis: • In women <65 years • Combined data for all agents studied (including quinolones and beta-lactams) • Long-term efficacy not studied • Side-effects in about 20% of patients

  30. Recurrent UTIs • Choice based on prior sensitivity results • Breakthrough resistant UTIs – indication to stop • No evidence for drug holidays or rotational antibiotics • Pivmecillinam not advised as prophylaxis • Failure of trial of prophylaxis Urology referral

  31. Take home messages • Antibiotic resistance rising dramatically. • Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is a global medical error that needs work. • New guidelines now in place. • We are here to help. QMC extension 61163 between 9am to 5.30pm– there is a medical microbiologist available or one who will shortly get back to you.

  32. Future work • Newly formed Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee at NUH with Primary Care representation • Integrated Fellowship in Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship starting in May 2016 • Interested in getting involved? • Please leave contact details today • Or contact: amelia.joseph@nuh.nhs.uk

  33. Questions?

More Related