130 likes | 267 Views
International multicenter randomized phase III study of 1 st line erlotinib followed by 2 nd line cisplatin + gemcitabine vs. 1 st line cisplatin + gemcitabine followed by 2 nd line erlotinib in advanced NSCLC. The TORCH trial.
E N D
International multicenter randomized phase III study of 1st line erlotinib followed by 2nd line cisplatin + gemcitabine vs. 1st line cisplatin + gemcitabine followed by 2nd line erlotinib in advanced NSCLC. The TORCH trial Authors: C.Gridelli1, F.Ciardiello2, R.Feld3, C.Butts4, V.Gebbia5, G.Genestreti6, A.Favaretto7, R.Wierzbicki8, C.Gallo2, F. Perrone9 on behalf of the TORCH Investigators Reviewed by: Dr. Charles Butts Date posted: ASCO 2010 Updates – June 15, 2010
Thank you for downloading this update. Please feel free to use it for educational purposes. Please acknowledge OncologyEducation.ca and Dr. Butts when using these slides.
Treatment A: First line Cisplatin + gemcitabine Followed by second line erlotinib at progression R Treatment B: First line erlotinib followed by Cisplatin + Gemcitabine at progression NSCLC No prior chemo Stage IIIB/IV PS 0,1
STUDY COMMENTARY • This trial was designed prior to the IPASS results becoming available. • Patient population was similar to Canadian population with majority being male, 3% Asian, and 20% never smokers • In an unselected population of Western patients with advanced NSCLC, the standard approach with chemo first followed by erlotinib second is superior to the reverse. • First line erlotinib results in lower response rates, shorter PFS and shorter OS in this population. • Overall, severe toxicities were no different.
BOTTOM LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS • Platinum based doublet chemotherapy remains standard first line therapy for unselected patients with advanced NSCLC. • These results compliment and enforce the results of the IPASS trial. • Patients with advanced NSCLC should not receive first line RGFR TKI without EGFR mutation status being tested.