60 likes | 251 Views
LMS Review. Current Environment Since the inception of the LMS, Dalhousie University has used Blackboard and its precursor Web CT There has never been a review of our LMS needs
E N D
Current Environment • Since the inception of the LMS, Dalhousie University has used Blackboard and its precursor Web CT • There has never been a review of our LMS needs • Enthusiasm grew within our partner institutions (Saint Mary’s, Mount Saint Vincent, NSCAD, St. FX, King’s, Université Sainte Anne, Acadia and the Atlantic School of Theology)
The Plan • Working with our partners, we are investigating the possibility of purchasing an LMS as a consortium • Put out an RFP to evaluate LMS offerings • Sandbox space from chosen vendors for evaluation
Evaluation Process Steering Committee • Formal Faculty Review • Two formal meetings (beginning and end) • Survey for each LMS • Formal Student Review • Three review sessions (two to test LMS, one focus group) • Survey for each LMS • Technical Review • System admin • Accessibility • Security • LMS Features • Informal Review by Community • Online feedback mechanism • A blog for updates and questions
The Dalhousie Committee • Brad Wuetherick: Executive Director for the Centre for Learning and teaching • Dwight Fischer: Assistant Vice President – CIO – ITS Services • Donna Bourne-Tyson: University Librarian • Marc Comeau: Director of Library IT • Greg Power: Director of MEDIT • Kim Kierans: Vice President University of King’s College • DSU VP Academic • David Gray: Dean of Agriculture • Vivian Howard: Associate Dean Academic, Faculty of Management • Brenda Merritt: Acting Associate Dean Academic, Faculty of Health Professions • Debbie Gordon: Program Director, College of Continuing Education
Timeline • October 10 – RFP Closes • October 17 – LMS Shortlist by Consortium • November 1 – Sandbox Space • November 14 – Demonstrations by Vendors • December 2 (end of classes) – Formal Evaluation evaluation completed • January 2– Informal Feedback closes • January 16 – Report submitted to Provost Committee • January 30 – Consortium decision made